ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Lomentospora prolificans is an emerging cause of serious invasive fungal infections. Optimal treatment of these infections is unknown, although voriconazole-containing treatment regimens are considered the treatment of choice. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of combination antifungal therapy for L. prolificans infections. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of medical records of patients with invasive L. prolificans infection diagnosed between 1 January 2008 and 9 September 2019 that were documented in the FungiScope® registry of rare invasive fungal infections. We compared clinical outcomes between antifungal treatment strategies. RESULTS: Over the study period, 41 individuals with invasive L. prolificans infection from eight different countries were documented in the FungiScope® registry. Overall, 17/40 (43%) had treatment response/stable disease and 21/40 (53%) had a fatal outcome attributed to invasive fungal infection. Combination antifungal therapy was associated with increased 28-day survival (15/24 survived versus 4/16 receiving monotherapy; p 0.027) and the combination voriconazole plus terbinafine trended to be associated with higher rates of treatment success (10/16, 63%, 95% CI 35%-85%) compared with other antifungal treatment regimens (7/24, 29%, 95% CI 13%-51%, p 0.053). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis there was a higher survival probability in individuals receiving the voriconazole/terbinafine combination compared with other antifungal regimens (median survival 150 days versus 17 days). CONCLUSIONS: While overall mortality was high, combination antifungal treatment, and in particular combination therapy with voriconazole plus terbinafine may be associated with improved treatment outcomes compared with other antifungal regimens for the treatment of invasive L. prolificans infections.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Terbinafine/therapeutic use , Voriconazole/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Invasive Fungal Infections/blood , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Scedosporium/drug effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We evaluated the risk factors for infection of 367 consecutive myeloma patients who underwent high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Examination of bone marrow iron stores (BMIS) prior to ASCT was used to evaluate body iron stores. Other variables included age, sex, active smoking, myeloma remission status, severity of mucositis and duration of severe neutropenia post-ASCT (<100 absolute neutrophils counts (ANC)/microl). Median age was 56 years; 61% of patients were males. 140 episodes of severe infections occurred in 116 patients, including bacteremia (73), pneumonia (40), severe colitis (25) and bacteremia with septic shock (two). The infection incidence per 1,000 days at risk was 45.2. Pre-ASCT risk factors for severe infection by univariate analysis were increased BMIS (OR=2.686; 95% CI 1.707-4.226; P<0.0001), smoking (OR=1.565; 95% CI 1.005-2.437; P=0.0474) and male gender (OR=1.624; 95% CI 1.019-2.589; P=0.0414). Increased BMIS (OR=2.716; 95% CI 1.720-4.287; P<0.0001) and smoking (OR=1.714; 95% CI 1.081-2.718; P=0.022) remained significant by multivariate analysis. Duration of ANC <100 micro/l (OR=1.129; 95% CI 1.039-1.226; P=0.0069 and OR=1.127; 95% CI 1.038-1.224; P=0.0045 by both univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively) was the only post-ASCT risk factor for infection. Increased pre-transplant BMIS and smoking are significant predictors of severe infection after myeloablative chemotherapy followed by ASCT in myeloma patients.