ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effects of surface electrical stimulation plus voice therapy on voice in dysphonic patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. METHOD: Patients were assigned to 3 treatment groups (n = 28 per group) and received daily treatment for 3 weeks on 5 days a week. All three groups received voice therapy (usual care). In addition, two groups received surface electrical stimulation, either motor-level or sensory-level stimulation. A standardised measurement protocol to evaluate therapeutic effects included the Voice Handicap Index and videolaryngostroboscopy. RESULTS: Voice Handicap Index and videolaryngostroboscopic assessment showed statistically significant differences between baseline and post-treatment across all groups, without any post-treatment differences between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Intensive voice therapy (usual care) improved idiopathic Parkinson's disease patients' self-assessment of voice impairment and the videolaryngostroboscopic outcome score. However, surface electrical stimulation used as an add-on to usual care did not improve idiopathic Parkinson's disease patients' self-assessment of voice impairment or the videolaryngostroboscopic outcome scores any further.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Parkinson Disease , Voice Disorders , Voice , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Voice/physiology , Voice Disorders/etiology , Voice Disorders/therapy , Electric Stimulation , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) polymorphism rs6265 (Val66Met) in both "natural" and treatment induced recovery of swallowing after dysphagic stroke. METHODS: Sixteen dysphagic stroke patients that completed a single-blind randomized sham controlled trial of pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) within 6 weeks of their stroke (N=38), were genotyped for the BDNF SNP Val66Met (rs6265) from saliva samples. These patients received active or sham PES according to randomized allocation. PES was delivered at a set frequency (5 Hz), intensity (75% of maximal tolerated), and duration (10 minutes) once a day for three consecutive days. Clinical measurements were taken from patients at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months post entering the study. Changes in swallowing ability based on the dysphagia severity rating scale (DSRS) were compared between active and sham groups and associated with BDNF SNP status. KEY RESULTS: In the active stimulation group, patients with the Met BDNF allele demonstrated significantly greater improvements in DSRS at 3 months compared to patients homozygous for the Val allele (P=.009). By comparison, there were no significant associations at the 2 week stage in either the active or sham group, or at 3 month in the sham group. Functional scores including the Barthel Index and modified Rankin scale were also unaffected by BDNF status. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Our findings suggest an association between BDNF and stimulation induced swallowing recovery. Further work will be required to validate these observations and demonstrate clinical utility in patients.
Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Deglutition Disorders/genetics , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Stroke/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Deglutition , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharynx/physiopathology , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Stroke/genetics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous reports have revealed that excitation of human pharyngeal motor cortex can be induced by pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) and swallowing carbonated water (CW). This study investigated whether combining PES with swallowing (of still water, SW or CW) can potentiate this excitation in either cortical and/or brain stem areas assessed with transcranial and transcutaneous magnetic stimulation (TMS). METHODS: Fourteen healthy volunteers participated and were intubated with an intraluminal catheter to record pharyngeal electromyography and deliver PES. Each participant underwent baseline corticopharyngeal, hand and craniobulbar motor-evoked potential (MEP) measurements. Subjects were then randomized to receive each of four 10-min interventions (PES only, ShamPES+CW, PES+CW, and PES+SW). Corticobulbar, craniobulbar and hand MEPs were then remeasured for up to 60 min and data analyzed using anova and post hoc t-tests. KEY RESULTS: A two-way rmanova for Interventions × Time-point showed a significant corticopharyngeal interaction (p = 0.010). One-way anova with post hoc t-tests indicated significant cortical changes with PES only at 45 (p = 0.038) and 60 min (p = 0.023) and ShamPES+CW immediately (p = 0.008) but not with PES+CW or PES+SW. By contrast, there were immediate craniobulbar amplitude changes only with PES+CW (p = 0.020) which were not sustained. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: We conclude that only PES produced long-term changes in corticopharyngeal excitability whereas combination stimuli were less effective. Our data suggest that PES alone rather than in combination, may be better for the patients who have difficulty in performing voluntary swallows.