Conduction slowing area during sinus rhythm harbors ventricular tachycardia isthmus.

INTRODUCTION: The voltage map during sinus rhythm (SR) is a cornerstone of substrate mapping (SM) in scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) and frequently used with pace mapping (PM). Where to conduct PM is unclear in cases of an extensive or unidentified substrate. Conduction properties are another aspect incorporated by SM, and conduction slowing has gained interest as being related to successful ablation, although its mechanism has not been elucidated. We aimed to investigate the relationship between SR conduction properties and VT isthmuses. METHODS: Nineteen patients (mean age, 62 years) who underwent VT ablation with voltage mapping and PM were reviewed. Isochronal late activation maps (ILAMs) with eight zones were reconstructed and sequentially named from one to eight according to the SR propagation. Good PM sites were superimposed on ILAMs, and the isthmus was defined using different pacing latencies. ILAM properties harboring isthmuses were investigated. RESULTS: Twenty-eight ILAMs (13 epicardium, 1 right ventricular [RV], and 14 left ventricular [LV] endocardium) were reviewed. Eighteen isthmuses of 24 target VTs were identified, in which the proximal ends were in a later zone than the distal ends (zone 6 vs 4; P < .001), suggesting a reverse isthmus vector to the SR. The conduction velocity of the zone involving the distal isthmus was significantly lower than that of the SR preceding zone (0.40 vs 1.30 m/s; P < .001). SR conduction velocity decelerated by 69.5% (range 59.7%-74.5%) before propagating into the isthmus area. CONCLUSION: Conduction slowing area during SR were related with the exit portion of the VT isthmuses.

Deep Negative Deflection in Unipolar His-Bundle Electrogram as a Predictor of Excellent His-Bundle Pacing Threshold Postimplant.

Background His-bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological form of pacing. Although high capture thresholds are common, few predictors of low HBP threshold have been determined. We aimed to identify electrophysiological predictors. Methods Fifty-one patients (53% with atrioventricular block) underwent HBP for bradycardia with an intrinsic QRS duration of <120 ms. Attempts to anchor the HBP lead were guided by unipolar His-bundle electrograms (HB EGMs) recorded with an electrophysiology recording system. Patients were followed-up for >6 months. Results In total, 153 attempts at anchoring the HBP lead were made, of which, 45 achieved acceptable HBP thresholds (≤2.5 V at 1 ms). The amplitude of negative deflection in HB EGM and the selective HBP form at fixation were independently associated with achieving an acceptable threshold. A negative amplitude of ≥0.060 mV in HB EGM was determined as the optimal value for identifying the acceptable threshold. This deep negative HB EGM was recorded with an HBP threshold of 1.4±1.3 V (in 34 attempts), significantly lower than that of positive HB EGM without deep negative deflection (2.8±1.3 V, in 31 trials; or >5 V, in 38 trials). The permanent HBP lead remained with deep negative (≥0.060 mV) or positive HB EGMs in 28 and 14 patients, respectively, and with positive or negative HB injury current in 19 and 23 patients, respectively. During follow-up, increased HBP threshold of >1 V was significantly more prevalent in the positive HB EGM group. The HBP thresholds of deep negative HB EGM and HB injury current, but not of the selective HBP group, were significantly lower than the other subgroups during follow-up. Conclusions Deep negative HB EGM at fixation was associated with an excellent short-term HBP threshold, similar to HB injury current. Analysis of unipolar HB EGM postfixation may enable prediction of permanent HBP threshold.