Low recurrence of syncope in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in preventing recurrence of syncope in patients with structural heart disease, previously unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias had an ICD implanted. All ICDs delivered antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy. Detection and therapy were programmed according to uniform criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63+/-11 years and most of them were male (36/38). After a mean follow-up of 28+/-15 (4-61) months, six patients died and one underwent heart transplantation. Syncope recurred in three patients, but in none of them was it caused by an arrhythmic event. In 18 patients, 113 episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation were detected and appropriately treated by the ICD. The mean time from implant until first appropriate therapy was 18+/-14 months. The actuarial probability of receiving appropriate therapy was 20% and 42% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias, ICD prevents syncope associated with arrhythmic events. Frequent effective use of antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy seem essential to this aim.

Mechanism of syncope in patients with bundle branch block and negative electrophysiological test.

BACKGROUND: In patients with syncope and bundle branch block (BBB), syncope is suspected to be attributable to a paroxysmal atrioventricular (AV) block, but little is known of its mechanism when electrophysiological study is negative. METHODS AND RESULTS: We applied an implantable loop recorder in 52 patients with BBB and negative conventional workup. During a follow-up of 3 to 15 months, syncope recurred in 22 patients (42%), the event being documented in 19 patients after a median of 48 days. The most frequent finding, recorded in 17 patients, was one or more prolonged asystolic pause mainly attributable to AV block; the remaining 2 patients had normal sinus rhythm or sinus tachycardia. The onset of the bradycardic episodes was always sudden but was sometimes preceded by ventricular premature beats. The median duration of the arrhythmic event was 47 seconds. An additional 3 patients developed nonsyncopal persistent III-degree AV block, and 2 patients had presyncope attributable to AV block with asystole. No patients suffered injury attributable to syncopal relapse. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BBB and negative electrophysiological study, most syncopal recurrences have a homogeneous mechanism that is characterized by prolonged asystolic pauses, mainly attributable to sudden-onset paroxysmal AV block.

Prognostic value of electrophysiologic investigations in Brugada syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of electrophysiologic investigations in individuals with Brugada syndrome is unclear. Previous studies failed to determine its value because of a limited number of patients or lack of events during follow-up. We present data on the prognostic value of electrophysiologic studies in the largest cohort ever collected of patients with Brugada syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-two individuals with an ECG diagnostic of Brugada syndrome were studied electrophysiologically. The diagnosis was made because of a classic ECG with a coved-type ST segment elevation in precordial leads V1 to V3. Of the 252 individuals, 116 had previously developed spontaneous symptoms (syncope or aborted sudden cardiac death) and 136 were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. A sustained ventricular arrhythmia was induced in 130 patients (51%). Symptomatic patients were more frequently inducible (73%) than asymptomatic individuals (33%) (P = 0.0001). Fifty-two individuals (21%) developed an arrhythmic event during a mean follow-up of 34 +/- 40 months. Inducibility was a powerful predictor of arrhythmic events during follow-up both in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Overall accuracy of programmed ventricular stimulation to predict outcome was 67%. Overall accuracy in asymptomatic individuals was 70.5%, with a 99% negative predictive value. Overall accuracy in symptomatic patients was 62%, with only a 4.5% false-negative rate. No significant differences were found in the duration of the H-V interval during sinus rhythm between symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals. However, the H-V interval was significantly longer in the asymptomatic individuals who became symptomatic during follow-up compared with those who did not develop symptoms (59 +/- 8 msec vs 48 +/- 11 msec, respectively; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Inducibility of sustained ventricular arrhythmias is a good predictor of outcome in Brugada syndrome. In asymptomatic individuals, a prolonged H-V interval during sinus rhythm is associated with a higher risk of developing arrhythmic events during follow-up. Symptomatic patients require protective treatment even when they are not inducible. Asymptomatic patients can be reassured if they are noninducible.