Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Neural Eng ; 15(1): 016006, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29211684

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses (EASSRs) are potentially useful for objective cochlear implant (CI) fitting and follow-up of the auditory maturation in infants and children with a CI. EASSRs are recorded in the electro-encephalogram (EEG) in response to electrical stimulation with continuous pulse trains, and are distorted by significant CI artifacts related to this electrical stimulation. The aim of this study is to evaluate a CI artifacts attenuation method based on independent component analysis (ICA) for three EASSR datasets. APPROACH: ICA has often been used to remove CI artifacts from the EEG to record transient auditory responses, such as cortical evoked auditory potentials. Independent components (ICs) corresponding to CI artifacts are then often manually identified. In this study, an ICA based CI artifacts attenuation method was developed and evaluated for EASSR measurements with varying CI artifacts and EASSR characteristics. Artifactual ICs were automatically identified based on their spectrum. MAIN RESULTS: For 40 Hz amplitude modulation (AM) stimulation at comfort level, in high SNR recordings, ICA succeeded in removing CI artifacts from all recording channels, without distorting the EASSR. For lower SNR recordings, with 40 Hz AM stimulation at lower levels, or 90 Hz AM stimulation, ICA either distorted the EASSR or could not remove all CI artifacts in most subjects, except for two of the seven subjects tested with low level 40 Hz AM stimulation. Noise levels were reduced after ICA was applied, and up to 29 ICs were rejected, suggesting poor ICA separation quality. SIGNIFICANCE: We hypothesize that ICA is capable of separating CI artifacts and EASSR in case the contralateral hemisphere is EASSR dominated. For small EASSRs or large CI artifact amplitudes, ICA separation quality is insufficient to ensure complete CI artifacts attenuation without EASSR distortion.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Artifacts , Cochlear Implants , Electroencephalography/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Principal Component Analysis/methods , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/standards , Cochlear Implants/standards , Databases, Factual , Electric Stimulation/methods , Humans
2.
Int J Audiol ; 53(5): 294-301, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24471410

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Music perception and appraisal are generally poor in cochlear implant recipients. Simple musical structures, lyrics that are easy to follow, and clear rhythm/beat have been reported among the top factors to enhance music enjoyment. The present study investigated the preference for modified relative instrument levels in music with normal-hearing and cochlear implant subjects. DESIGN: In experiment 1, test subjects were given a mixing console and multi-track recordings to determine their most enjoyable audio mix. In experiment 2, a preference rating experiment based on the preferred relative level settings in experiment 1 was performed. STUDY SAMPLE: Experiment 1 was performed with four postlingually deafened cochlear implant subjects, experiment 2 with ten normal-hearing and ten cochlear implant subjects. RESULTS: A significant difference in preference rating was found between normal-hearing and cochlear implant subjects. The latter preferred an audio mix with larger vocals-to-instruments ratio. In addition, given an audio mix with clear vocals and attenuated instruments, cochlear implant subjects preferred the bass/drum track to be louder than the other instrument tracks. CONCLUSIONS: The original audio mix in real-world music might not be suitable for cochlear implant recipients. Modifying the relative instrument level settings potentially improves music enjoyment.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Music/psychology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Aged , Auditory Perception , Correction of Hearing Impairment/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Preference/psychology , Pilot Projects , Signal-To-Noise Ratio
3.
Hear Res ; 299: 79-87, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23396271

ABSTRACT

The present study investigates the most important factors that limit the intelligibility of the cochlear implant (CI) processed speech in noisy environments. The electrical stimulation sequences provided in CIs are affected by the noise in the following three manners. First of all, the natural gaps in the speech are filled, which distorts the low-frequency ON/OFF modulations of the speech signal. Secondly, speech envelopes are distorted to include modulations of both speech and noise. Lastly, the N-of-M type of speech coding strategies may select the noise dominated channels instead of the dominant speech channels at low signal-to-noise ratio's (SNRs). Different stimulation sequences are tested with CI subjects to study how these three noise effects individually limit the intelligibility of the CI processed speech. Tests are also conducted with normal hearing (NH) subjects using vocoded speech to identify any significant differences in the noise reduction requirements and speech distortion limitations between the two subject groups. Results indicate that compared to NH subjects CI subjects can tolerate significantly lower levels of steady state speech shaped noise in the speech gaps but at the same time can tolerate comparable levels of distortions in the speech segments. Furthermore, modulations in the stimulus current level have no effect on speech intelligibility as long as the channel selection remains ideal. Finally, wrong maxima selection together with the introduction of noise in the speech gaps significantly degrades the intelligibility. At low SNRs wrong maxima selection introduces interruptions in the speech and makes it difficult to fuse noisy and interrupted speech signals into a coherent speech stream.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Noise/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Auditory Threshold , Case-Control Studies , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Comprehension , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Sound Spectrography , Speech Reception Threshold Test , Time Factors
4.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 126(6): 3209-13, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20000934

ABSTRACT

Users of a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid are sensitive to interaural level differences (ILDs). However, when using their clinical devices, most of these subjects cannot use ILD cues for localization in the horizontal plane. This is partly due to a lack of high-frequency residual hearing in the acoustically stimulated ear. Using acoustic simulations of a cochlear implant and hearing loss, it is shown that localization performance can be improved by up to 14 degrees rms error relative to 48 degrees rms error for broadband noise by artificially introducing ILD cues in the low frequencies. The algorithm that was used for ILD introduction is described.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Ear , Hearing , Models, Neurological , Sound Localization , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Algorithms , Analysis of Variance , Cochlear Implants , Cues , Hearing Loss , Humans , Noise , Psychoacoustics , Young Adult
5.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 126(1): 254-68, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19603882

ABSTRACT

Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) are used for hearing threshold estimation at audiometric frequencies. Hearing impaired newborns, in particular, benefit from this technique as it allows for a more precise diagnosis than traditional techniques, and a hearing aid can be better fitted at an early age. However, measurement duration of current single-channel techniques is still too long for clinical widespread use. This paper evaluates the practical performance of a multi-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) processing strategy based on a detection theory approach. A minimum electrode set is determined for ASSRs with frequencies between 80 and 110 Hz using eight-channel EEG measurements of ten normal-hearing adults. This set provides a near-optimal hearing threshold estimate for all subjects and improves response detection significantly for EEG data with numerous artifacts. Multi-channel processing does not significantly improve response detection for EEG data with few artifacts. In this case, best response detection is obtained when noise-weighted averaging is applied on single-channel data. The same test setup (eight channels, ten normal-hearing subjects) is also used to determine a minimum electrode setup for 10-Hz ASSRs. This configuration allows to record near-optimal signal-to-noise ratios for 80% of subjects.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiology , Auditory Perception/physiology , Brain Stem/physiology , Electrodes , Electroencephalography/instrumentation , Electroencephalography/methods , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Algorithms , Artifacts , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Theoretical , Young Adult
6.
J Neurosci Methods ; 169(1): 239-48, 2008 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18215424

ABSTRACT

The possibilities of currently commercially available auditory steady-state response (ASSR) devices are mostly limited to avoid unintentional misuse and to guarantuee patient safety as such. Some setups, e.g. do not allow the application of high intensities or the use of own stimuli. Moreover, most devices generally only allow data collection using maximal two EEG channels. The freedom to modify and extend the accompagnying software and hardware is very restricted or inexistent. As a result, these devices are not suited for research and several clinically diagnostic purposes. In this paper, a research platform for multi-channel ASSR measurements is presented, referred to as SOMA (setup ORL for multi-channel ASSR). The setup allows multi-channel measurements and the use of own stimuli. It can be easily extended to facilitate new measurement protocols and real-time signal processing. The mobile setup is based on an inexpensive multi-channel RME soundcard and software is written in C++. Both hardware and software of the setup are described. An evaluation study with nine normal-hearing subjects shows no significant performance differences between a reference and the proposed platform. SOMA presents a flexible and modularly extensible mobile high-end multi-channel ASSR test platform.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Evoked Response/methods , Auditory Perception/physiology , Electroencephalography/methods , Electronics/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Software/standards , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Audiometry, Evoked Response/instrumentation , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Electroencephalography/instrumentation , Electronics/instrumentation , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Reference Values , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Software/trends
7.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 119(1): 515-26, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16454305

ABSTRACT

This paper studies the effect of bilateral hearing aids on directional hearing in the frontal horizontal plane. Localization tests evaluated bilateral hearing aid users using different stimuli and different noise scenarios. Normal hearing subjects were used as a reference. The main research questions raised in this paper are: (i) How do bilateral hearing aid users perform on a localization task, relative to normal hearing subjects? (ii) Do bilateral hearing aids preserve localization cues, and (iii) Is there an influence of state of the art noise reduction algorithms, more in particular an adaptive directional microphone configuration, on localization performance? The hearing aid users were tested without and with their hearing aids, using both a standard omnidirectional microphone configuration and an adaptive directional microphone configuration. The following main conclusions are drawn. (i) Bilateral hearing aid users perform worse than normal hearing subjects in a localization task, although more than one-half of the subjects reach normal hearing performance when tested unaided. For both groups, localization performance drops significantly when acoustical scenarios become more complex. (ii) Bilateral, i.e., independently operating hearing aids do not preserve localization cues. (iii) Overall, adaptive directional noise reduction can have an additional and significant negative impact on localization performance.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Sound Localization/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychoacoustics , Sound Spectrography
8.
J Neurosci Methods ; 142(1): 131-6, 2005 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15652626

ABSTRACT

A user-friendly and versatile research platform for use in auditory experiments, referred to as APEX (Application for PsychoElectrical eXperiments), is described. The platform takes care of automatic stimulus presentation and collection of the subject's responses. Acoustical auditory, as well as electrical auditory experiments with CI recipients can be conducted. The platform currently supports LAURA, Nucleus CI22 and Nucleus CI24 cochlear implants. The graphical user interface for the subjects has been extended to allow for testing very young children, by embedding the psychophysical procedures in a computer game. The research platform is available free of charge.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Electric Stimulation/methods , Hearing Tests/methods , Neurophysiology/methods , Psychophysics/methods , Software , Acoustic Stimulation/instrumentation , Adult , Auditory Pathways/physiology , Auditory Perception/physiology , Brain/physiology , Child , Cochlear Implants , Computer Graphics/trends , Computers/standards , Computers/trends , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , Hearing/physiology , Hearing Tests/instrumentation , Humans , Neurophysiology/instrumentation , Psychophysics/instrumentation , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL