His and para-His pacing in AV block: feasibility and electrocardiographic findings.

PURPOSE: Right ventricular apical pacing induces a dyssynchronous activation of the left ventricle and is associated with adverse clinical outcome. We aimed to establish permanent His-bundle pacing or para-His pacing in patients with high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block. METHOD: We included patients with pacemaker indication due to second- or third-degree AV block, left ventricular ejection fraction >0.40, QRS duration <120 ms, and sinus rhythm. All patients received a pacemaker with one atrial lead, one right ventricular mid-septal lead, and one lead in the His bundle or in the para-His position. Pacing from apex was performed temporarily. Patients were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included (mean age, 67 ± 10 years; 30 (79%) male). Mean implantation time was 85 ± 31 min, mean fluoroscopy time was 23 ± 13 min, and mean position attempts of the His bundle lead was 8 ± 5. In four patients, we established direct His-bundle pacing with a mean QRS of 100 ± 19 ms, and in 28 patients, para-His pacing was achieved with a mean QRS of 112 ± 18 ms, and in six patients, neither direct His-bundle pacing or para-His pacing could be achieved. The mean QRS duration was 153 ± 12 ms with mid-septal pacing and 161 ± 15 ms with apical pacing. CONCLUSION: Stable direct His-bundle pacing or para-His pacing is feasible in 85% of patients with narrow QRS and high-grade AV block and leads to a normal or near-normal ventricular activation pattern.

The superior transseptal surgical approach to mitral valve creates slow conduction.

BACKGROUND: Atrial tachycardia is very frequent after mitral valve surgery using the superior transseptal approach. METHODS: Sixteen patients operated on for mitral valve disease (superior transseptal approach = Group A, n = 9, and left atrial approach = Group B, n = 7) underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia guided by electroanatomic mapping. Twenty-six consecutive patients without previous cardiac surgery with typical atrial flutter served as controls (Group C). RESULTS: Atrial tachycardia occurred earlier after the operation in Group A than in Group B (median 97 vs 2,159 days, P = 0.003). Typical atrial flutter was the most frequent circuit in all groups (Group A-7 patients, Group B-5 patients, Group C-26 patients). Three patients in Group A developed right atrial incisional tachycardia. Ten of 14 tachycardia circuits (typical atrial flutter, n = 7, incisional tachycardia, n = 3) in Group A depended on the corridor between the right atrial part of the atriotomy and the tricuspid annulus. Slow conduction during typical atrial flutter was detected in this corridor in Group A, but not in the corresponding region in Groups B and C (P < 0.001). The cycle length of typical atrial flutter was longer in Groups A and B than in Group C (mean 283 ms and 282 ms vs 233 ms, P = 0.003). Patients in Group B with typical atrial flutter had larger right atria than patients in Group A or Group C (mean 156 mL vs 96 mL and 113 mL, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The superior transseptal incision may predispose to atrial tachycardia by creating slow conduction between the atriotomy and the tricuspid annulus.

Left atrial far-field sensing by left ventricular leads: a potential hazard in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) requires a lead advanced through the coronary sinus (CS) to pace the left ventricle (LV). Left atrial far-field signals (LAFFS) may be sensed by the LV lead at the time of implant or after lead dislodgement, and may inhibit ventricular pacing. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of detection of LAFFS > 2 mV and its correlation with the CS lead position. METHODS: Data from the first 75 consecutive patients enrolled in the InSync III multicentre study were analysed. The position of the LV lead was recorded at implant. During follow-up, pacing was temporarily inhibited and the LV channel electrogram was recorded. The amplitude of LAFFS observed before discharge from the hospital and at 1 month of follow-up was retrospectively analysed. A LAFFS > 2 mV was considered clinically significant. RESULTS: CRT systems were successfully implanted in 71 of 75 patients. A LAFFS > 2 mV was recorded by the LV lead channel in six of 71 patients (8.5%). This phenomenon developed between hospital discharge and 1 month of follow-up in two of these patients and in one case disappeared within 1 month. It was observed in all CS tributaries except the anterior and mid-cardiac veins. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial far-field signals sensed by the LV lead were not rare. Implanting physicians should be aware of this phenomenon in order to prevent potentially serious complications.

Ablation of atrial tachycardia after surgery for congenital and acquired heart disease using an electroanatomic mapping system: Which circuits to expect in which substrate?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare atrial tachycardia circuits after a range of cardiac operations. BACKGROUND: Knowledge of circuits occurring in a given postsurgical substrate should help to ablate these challenging tachycardias and develop potential preventive strategies. METHODS: We analyzed tachycardia circuits in 83 consecutive patients (60 males; median age 47 years, range 9-73) after atrial incisions undergoing ablation of atrial tachycardias. A combined strategy of electroanatomic (CARTO) and entrainment mapping was used. Fifty-two patients (63%) underwent operation for congenital and 31 (37%) for acquired heart disease. Patients were divided into subgroups based on the intervention performed in the atria: right lateral atriotomy (39 patients), left atrial (11) and superior transseptal (10) approach to the mitral valve, biatrial heart transplantation (8), Mustard (8) and Fontan (4) procedure, and other interventions (3). RESULTS: Most of the 119 tachycardias mapped were isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (66) and incisional tachycardia (30). Isthmus-dependent atrial flutter was the most frequent arrhythmia in all subgroups except for Fontan patients, in whom incisional tachycardia was most frequent. The distribution of tachycardia circuits did not differ significantly among groups. CONCLUSIONS: The observed circuits did not differ among the postsurgical substrates. Isthmus-dependent atrial flutter should be the first circuit considered in patients after atrial incisions.