Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(1): 42-8, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23912664

ABSTRACT

This retrospective national study compared the use of alemtuzumab-based conditioning regimens for hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in acquired severe aplastic anemia with antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based regimens. One hundred patients received alemtuzumab and 55 ATG-based regimens. A matched sibling donor (MSD) was used in 87 (56%), matched unrelated donor (MUD) in 60 (39%) and other related or mismatched unrelated donor (UD) in 8 (5%) patients. Engraftment failure occurred in 9% of the alemtuzumab group and 11% of the ATG group. Five-year OS was 90% for the alemtuzumab and 79% for the ATG groups, P=0.11. For UD HSCT, OS of patients was better when using alemtuzumab (88%) compared with ATG (57%), P=0.026, although smaller numbers of patients received ATG. Similar outcomes for MSD HSCT using alemtuzumab or ATG were seen (91% vs 85%, respectively, P=0.562). A lower risk of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was observed in the alemtuzumab group (11% vs 26%, P=0.031). On multivariate analysis, use of BM as stem cell source was associated with better OS and EFS, and less acute and cGVHD; young age was associated with better EFS and lower risk of graft failure. This large study confirms successful avoidance of irradiation in the conditioning regimens for MUD HSCT patients.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Aplastic/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alemtuzumab , Bone Marrow Cells/cytology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Survival , Graft vs Host Disease , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Siblings , Tissue Donors , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , Young Adult
2.
Leuk Res ; 34(6): 723-7, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19944463

ABSTRACT

We report on a retrospective analysis examining the influence of pre-transplant serum ferritin on transplant outcomes of 99 MDS patients receiving reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT. The median pre-transplant ferritin value was 1992 ng/ml (range: 6-9580 ng/ml). No patients received iron chelation therapy preceding transplantation. On univariate analysis, there was a strong correlation between a higher pre-transplant serum ferritin (>1500 ng/ml) and a significantly inferior 3-year OS (64.6+/-7.5% vs 39.6+/-7.3%, p=0.01). However, pre-transplant serum ferritin did not influence 3-year TRM (20.2+/-7% vs 27.4+/-7%, p=0.24). There was no difference in infection-related mortality, and incidence of acute or chronic GvHD between cohorts. On multivariate analysis, a raised serum ferritin (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 0.97-3.57, p=0.03), and the presence of >5% bone marrow blasts at time of transplantation (HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 0.84-4.58, p=0.06) were independent predictors of an inferior overall survival. However, pre-transplant serum ferritin was not a significant predictor of disease-free survival, relapse or TRM. When compared with myeloablative regimens, RIC regimens may attenuate the impact of iron overload related end-organ toxicity. Prospective studies incorporating alternative biomarkers of iron metabolism alongside serum ferritin levels are needed to improve our understanding of the significance of iron overload in MDS patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation.


Subject(s)
Ferritins/blood , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/blood , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/blood , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Ferritins/analysis , Follow-Up Studies , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/diagnosis , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/blood , Neoplasms, Second Primary/therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 156(5): 1032-8, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17419693

ABSTRACT

Sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of bone marrow transplantation. While GVHD is often associated with the beneficial graft vs. tumour effect, it also contributes towards significant morbidity and mortality. No reliably effective treatment has yet been established. We present 10 patients with haematological malignancies who underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant and developed sclerodermatous GVHD. Donor lymphocyte infusion administered for relapse or reducing donor T-cell chimerism was a known trigger for sclerodermatous GVHD in four of the patients. Treatment with immunosuppressants, psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) and extracorporeal photopheresis has been largely unsuccessful in their management. Intensive immunosuppression including the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody may have contributed to relapse of leukaemia in one patient 10 years after her transplant. Sclerodermatous GVHD may occur without a preceding lichenoid stage. Clinical heterogeneity is common, although sclerodermatous GVHD has a predilection for the limbs. Treatment options are largely unsatisfactory if conventional immunosuppression fails. PUVA may give some symptomatic benefit and extracorporeal photopheresis seems to be less efficacious than previously published work suggests.


Subject(s)
Scleroderma, Localized/therapy , Adult , Aged , Anemia, Refractory/surgery , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Female , Hodgkin Disease/surgery , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , PUVA Therapy , Plasmacytoma/surgery , Recurrence , Scleroderma, Localized/classification , Scleroderma, Localized/etiology , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Thrombocytosis/surgery , Treatment Failure
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 26 Suppl F: 89-99, 1990 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2292549

ABSTRACT

In a randomized multicentre study ciprofloxacin combined with azlocillin was compared with gentamicin and azlocillin for the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients. In 147 evaluable episodes in 108 patients, 80 patients received ciprofloxacin/azlocillin and 67 received gentamicin/azlocillin. The two treatment groups were comparable in terms of age, underlying diagnosis, and duration of neutropenia. Microbiologically documented infections were the cause of fever in 34 (42.5%) and 29 (43.3%) episodes in the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin and gentamicin/azlocillin groups respectively. At the end of therapy, 46 patients (57.5%) receiving ciprofloxacin/azlocillin showed complete resolution compared with 30 (44.7%) for the gentamicin/azlocillin group (P = 0.14). The clinical response rate for microbiologically documented episodes was 58.8% and 48.3% respectively (P = 0.45). Among the microbiologically documented infections with follow-up cultures available, 24 (92.3%) of 26 isolates from patients receiving ciprofloxacin/azlocillin were eradicated, in comparison with 19 (86.4%) of 22 in the gentamicin/azlocillin group (P = 0.65). There were five superinfections, all in the gentamicin/azlocillin group. Significant resistance to the study drugs was not seen. Of all evaluable patients, including those subsequently withdrawn because of early modification of therapy, there were 12 deaths within the study period; six (6.8%) of these occurred in 88 patients randomized to the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin group, compared with two of 80 (2.5%) in the gentamicin/azlocillin group. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated; one patient in the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin group developed convulsions, probably related to ciprofloxacin. The combination of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin is as effective as gentamicin plus azlocillin and offers a useful alternative for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.


Subject(s)
Azlocillin/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Neutropenia/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Azlocillin/adverse effects , Ciprofloxacin/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/therapeutic use , Female , Fever/drug therapy , Fever/etiology , Gentamicins/adverse effects , Humans , Remission Induction , Superinfection/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL