Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Am J Hypertens ; 10(3): 250-60, 1997 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9056681

ABSTRACT

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was undertaken to assess the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a controlled-release (Coat-Core [CC] tablet) formulation of the second-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, nisoldipine. Of the 208 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, two were excluded from the main efficacy analysis, and the rest randomized into one of four treatment groups, to receive either placebo, or nisoldipine CC at doses of 10, 20, or 30 mg once daily for 6 weeks, following a 4-week placebo run-in period. Blood pressure measurements (supine, standing, diastolic, and systolic) were taken at trough plasma levels, 24 h after previous dosing at 2-week intervals throughout the study. Adverse events and laboratory parameters (plasma lipid and glucose levels, and thyroid function) were monitored. All three doses of nisoldipine CC lowered blood pressure, as compared with placebo, 24 h after dosing. At endpoint (after 6 weeks) mean changes in supine blood pressure from baseline were (systolic/diastolic) 0.9/-2.3, -8.0/-5.5, -16.9/-9.0, and -15.0/-10.3 mm Hg for the groups assigned to placebo and nisoldipine CC 10, 20, and 30 mg, respectively. The response rates were 35%, 47%, and 63% for nisoldipine CC 10, 20, and 30 mg, respectively. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring showed that nisoldipine CC effectively controlled blood pressure throughout the dosing interval. No change in heart rate was seen for all three doses of nisoldipine CC over the 24-h dosing interval. Nisoldipine CC was at least as effective in black patients as in whites. Generally adverse events were not increased, except for peripheral edema, with rates of 7% in placebo, and 6%, 9%, and 19%, respectively, in those receiving nisoldipine CC 10, 20, or 30 mg daily. There were no clinically significant changes in blood lipids, blood glucose, or thyroid function. In conclusion, once-daily nisoldipine CC at doses of 10 to 30 mg was an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive agent, providing 24-h control of blood pressure without any increase in heart rate.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Nisoldipine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nisoldipine/administration & dosage , Nisoldipine/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Racial Groups , Tablets, Enteric-Coated
2.
S Afr Med J ; 79(1): 12-5, 1991 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1986440

ABSTRACT

The antihypertensive effects, as assessed by clinical and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, of nifedipine slow-release (SR), atenolol and the two in combination were evaluated in 28 known hypertensives in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised cross-over trial. Clinical blood pressure was significantly lower on combination therapy (P less than 0.025) than on either agent alone, although all therapeutic agents reduced blood pressure significantly when compared with placebo (P less than 0.01). All ambulatory blood pressure measurements obtained on any therapeutic agent were significantly lower than those obtained on placebo (P less than 0.01). The mean daytime (08h00-17h00) ambulatory blood pressure measurement as well as the percentage of this monitoring period during which patients were hypertensive were significantly lower (P less than 0.01) on combination therapy than on nifedipine SR. A similar pattern was observed for 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Headache was the most significant adverse effect. This was most common with nifedipine SR, less common with combination therapy and least common with atenolol. Combination therapy with nifedipine SR and atenolol is therefore a viable therapeutic alternative in the treatment of patients with benign essential hypertension.


Subject(s)
Atenolol/administration & dosage , Hypertension/drug therapy , Nifedipine/administration & dosage , Adult , Atenolol/adverse effects , Atenolol/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nifedipine/adverse effects , Nifedipine/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL