Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Endocrinology ; 159(3): 1277-1289, 2018 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29425295

ABSTRACT

Unconventional oil and gas (UOG) operations, which combine hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and directional drilling, involve the use of hundreds of chemicals, including many with endocrine-disrupting properties. Two previous studies examined mice exposed during early development to a 23-chemical mixture of UOG compounds (UOG-MIX) commonly used or produced in the process. Both male and female offspring exposed prenatally to one or more doses of UOG-MIX displayed alterations to endocrine organ function and serum hormone concentrations. We hypothesized that prenatal UOG-MIX exposure would similarly disrupt development of the mouse mammary gland. Female C57Bl/6 mice were exposed to ~3, ~30, ~ 300, or ~3000 µg/kg/d UOG-MIX from gestational day 11 to birth. Although no effects were observed on the mammary glands of these females before puberty, in early adulthood, females exposed to 300 or 3000 µg/kg/d UOG-MIX developed more dense mammary epithelial ducts; females exposed to 3 µg/kg/d UOG-MIX had an altered ratio of apoptosis to proliferation in the mammary epithelium. Furthermore, adult females from all UOG-MIX-treated groups developed intraductal hyperplasia that resembled terminal end buds (i.e., highly proliferative structures typically seen at puberty). These results suggest that the mammary gland is sensitive to mixtures of chemicals used in UOG production at exposure levels that are environmentally relevant. The effect of these findings on the long-term health of the mammary gland, including its lactational capacity and its risk of cancer, should be evaluated in future studies.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Hydraulic Fracking/methods , Mammary Glands, Animal/growth & development , Oil and Gas Industry/methods , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/chemically induced , Animals , Apoptosis , Environmental Exposure , Female , Gestational Age , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Nick-End Labeling , Lactation , Mammary Glands, Animal/pathology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Pregnancy , Sexual Maturation
2.
Fertil Steril ; 106(4): 795-819, 2016 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27568524

ABSTRACT

This systematic review identified 45 original published research articles related to oil and gas extraction activities and human reproductive endpoints. Reproductive outcomes were categorized as [1] birth outcomes associated with maternal exposure, [2] semen quality, fertility, and birth outcomes associated with adult paternal exposure, [3] reproductive cancers, and [4] disruption of human sex steroid hormone receptors. The results indicate there is moderate evidence for an increased risk of preterm birth, miscarriage, birth defects, decreased semen quality, and prostate cancer. The quality of the evidence is low and/or inadequate for stillbirth, sex ratio, and birth outcomes associated with paternal exposure, and testicular cancer, female reproductive tract cancers, and breast cancer, and the evidence is inconsistent for an increased risk of low birth weight; therefore, no conclusions can be drawn for these health effects. There is ample evidence for disruption of the estrogen, androgen, and progesterone receptors by oil and gas chemicals, which provides a mechanistic rationale for how exposure to oil and gas activities may increase the health risks we have outlined. The results from this systematic review suggest there is a negative impact on human reproduction from exposure to oil and gas activities. Many of the 45 studies reviewed identified potential human health effects. Most of these studies focused on conventional oil and gas activities. Few studies have been conducted to evaluate the impact of unconventional oil and gas operations on human health. The impact of unconventional oil and gas activities may be greater than that of conventional activity, given that unconventional activities employ many of the same approaches and use dozens of known endocrine-disrupting chemicals in hydraulic fracturing.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Natural Gas/adverse effects , Oil and Gas Fields , Oil and Gas Industry , Petroleum/adverse effects , Reproduction/drug effects , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Fertility/drug effects , Genital Neoplasms, Female/chemically induced , Genital Neoplasms, Male/chemically induced , Humans , Hydraulic Fracking , Infertility/chemically induced , Infertility/physiopathology , Male , Maternal Exposure/adverse effects , Paternal Exposure/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/chemically induced , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Receptors, Steroid/drug effects , Receptors, Steroid/metabolism , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Spermatozoa/drug effects , Spermatozoa/pathology
3.
Environ Health Perspect ; 124(3): 256-64, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26311476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hydraulic fracturing technologies, developed over the last 65 years, have only recently been combined with horizontal drilling to unlock oil and gas reserves previously deemed inaccessible. Although these technologies have dramatically increased domestic oil and natural gas production, they have also raised concerns for the potential contamination of local water supplies with the approximately 1,000 chemicals that are used throughout the process, including many known or suspected endocrine-disrupting chemicals. OBJECTIVES: We discuss the need for an endocrine component to health assessments for drilling-dense regions in the context of hormonal and antihormonal activities for chemicals used. METHODS: We discuss the literature on a) surface and groundwater contamination by oil and gas extraction operations, and b) potential human exposure, particularly in the context of the total hormonal and antihormonal activities present in surface and groundwater from natural and anthropogenic sources; we also discuss initial analytical results and critical knowledge gaps. DISCUSSION: In light of the potential for environmental release of oil and gas chemicals that can disrupt hormone receptor systems, we recommend methods for assessing complex hormonally active environmental mixtures. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a need for an endocrine-centric component for overall health assessments and provide information supporting the idea that using such a component will help explain reported adverse health trends as well as help develop recommendations for environmental impact assessments and monitoring programs.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors/chemistry , Oil and Gas Fields , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Endocrine Disruptors/adverse effects , Environment , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Groundwater/chemistry , Humans , Petroleum , Water Pollutants, Chemical/adverse effects , Water Pollution, Chemical , Water Supply
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL