Tenapanor for peritoneal dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia: a phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Tenapanor is a novel selective inhibitor of intestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 transporter. This is the first trial to assess the efficacy and safety of tenapanor in Japanese patients with hyperphosphatemia who are undergoing peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial targeted patients whose serum phosphorus was within 3.5-7.0 mg/dL with phosphate binders at screening. After phosphate binder washout, tenapanor was orally administered twice-daily, stepwise from 5 to 30 mg/dose for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint, mean change in serum phosphorus level, was evaluated at week 8. The 16-week treatment period was completed with tenapanor alone, and only one phosphate binder type was allowed for combined use after the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients enrolled, 34 completed the study. At week 8, the primary endpoint, mean change in serum phosphorus level (last observation carried forward), was - 1.18 mg/dL (95% confidence interval: - 1.54, - 0.81 mg/dL) with tenapanor. From a baseline value of 7.65 mg/dL, serum phosphorus decreased to 6.14 and 5.44 mg/dL at weeks 8 and 16, respectively, and 46.3% and 76.5% of patients achieved serum phosphorus within 3.5-6.0 mg/dL at week 8 and week 16, respectively. The most common adverse event, diarrhea, occurred in 74.1% of patients; the severity of diarrhea was mild or moderate. Thus, the discontinuation percentage due to diarrhea was low at 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of tenapanor resulted in a sufficient reduction in serum phosphorus level at week 8 and was considered safe and tolerable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04766385.

Long-term safety and decrease of pill burden by tenapanor therapy: a phase 3 open-label study in hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia.

Phosphate binders (PBs) generally have a high pill burden. Tenapanor selectively inhibits sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3, reducing intestinal phosphate absorption. Tenapanor is a novel drug administered as a small tablet, twice daily. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety of tenapanor and its efficacy in decreasing PB pill burden. Tenapanor 5 mg twice daily was administered to hemodialysis patients with serum phosphorus level 3.5-7.0 mg/dl at baseline; the dose could be increased up to 30 mg twice daily. Patients could also switch from PBs. The primary endpoint was safety during 52-week administration. The key secondary endpoint was a ≥ 30% reduction in the total pill number of daily PBs and tenapanor from baseline. Of 212 patients starting treatment, 154 completed the study. Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event, occurring in 135 patients (63.7%); most events were classified as mild (74.8%). No clinically significant changes occurred other than serum phosphorus level. At Week 52/discontinuation, 158/204 patients (77.5%) achieved the key secondary endpoint. Complete switching from PBs to tenapanor was achieved in 50-76 patients (26.7%-41.5%), and 80 patients (51.9%) at Week 8-12 and Week 50, respectively. Serum phosphorus remained generally stable within the target range (3.5-6.0 mg/dl). These findings suggest the long-term safety and tolerability of tenapanor. Tenapanor could reduce or eliminate PB pill burden while controlling serum phosphorus levels.Trial registration: NCT04771780.

Improving Acute In-Hospital Stroke Care by Reorganization of an In-Hospital Stroke Code Protocol.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delays in recognition and assessment of in-hospital strokes (IHS) can lead to poor outcomes. The aim was to examine whether reorganized IHS code protocol can reduce treatment time. METHODS: IHS code protocol was developed, educational workshops were held for medical personnel. In the protocol, any medical personnel should directly consult a stroke neurologist before any diagnostic studies. Time intervals were compared between the pre- and post-implementation periods and between direct consultation with a stroke neurologist (DC group) and non-DC group in the post-implementation period. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were included (pre, 42; post, 103). Time from recognition to stroke neurologist assessment (91 vs. 35 min, p = 0.002) and time from recognition to neuroimaging (123 vs. 74, p = 0.013) were significantly lower in the post-implementation period. Time from stroke neurologist assessment to groin puncture was significantly lower (135 vs. 81, p = 0.037). In the post-implementation period, DC group showed significant time savings from last known well (LKW) to recognition (93 vs. 260, p = 0.001), LKW to stroke neurologist assessment (145 vs. 378, p = 0.001), and recognition to stroke neurologist assessment (16 vs. 76, p < 0.001) compared with non-DC group. CONCLUSIONS: Reorganization of IHS code protocol reduced time from stroke recognition to assessment and treatment time. Reorganized IHS code and direct consultation with a stroke neurologist improved the initial response time.