Long-term results following sacral nerve stimulation for chronic constipation.

AIM: The long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for chronic functional constipation was assessed. METHOD: Patients who received a definitive SNS implant for chronic functional constipation only (according to the Rome III criteria) and were followed up for at least 3 years were included in this study. Slow transit constipation (STC) was distinguished from obstructed defaecation (OD) and mixed/undetermined constipation (MU). Constipation features, Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS) and SF-36 questionnaire data were collected; physiological tests were performed. RESULTS: Forty-two out of 61 patients suitable for SNS received a definitive implant (14 for STC, 15 for OD, 13 for MU). Following SNS device implantation (mean follow-up 51 ± 15 months), the baseline CCCS (17 ± 6) dropped to 9 ± 6 (P < 0.001) and 47% of patients had an improvement in the CCCS of more than 50%. Such improvement was more significant in patients with OD. Anal pressures did not change, while threshold and urgency rectal sensation significantly decreased, in particular in patients with OD. All aspects of patients' health status (SF-36) improved significantly following SNS; this was more marked in patients with OD. CONCLUSION: Data from this study suggest that the clinical efficacy of SNS can be prolonged in constipated patients, but in both the preliminary diagnostic assessment and pathophysiological interpretation every effort should be made to select patients for SNS. Although SNS showed efficacy in a low percentage of patients with STC, patients with OD were more responsive.

Sacral neuromodulation for bowel dysfunction: a consensus statement from the Italian group.

BACKGROUND: Representatives from the Italian centers experienced in sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for the treatment of bowel dysfunction met in order to define the current clinical practice in Italy and to produce a consensus statement regarding indications for this therapy and patient management. METHODS: Fifty Italian colonproctologists were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning their clinical practice in SNM (290 questions, grouped within 4 broad areas). Physicians expressed their opinion by completing the questionnaire, assigning to each statement their level of agreement according to the 5-point Likert scale; the data were analyzed by attributing to each expert's answers a weight proportional to the degree of experience. During a meeting held 2 months later, the critical aspects of the therapy were re-examined and discussions held with the goal of reaching an agreement on controversial topics. The available literature was reviewed. RESULTS: Patient selection criteria, etiology, diagnostic investigations, test procedures and implantation, follow-up and evaluation of results have been reviewed. The aim was to achieve an algorithm for patient management, showing the place of SNM in the treatment of bowel dysfunction. The approach in case of treatment failure was also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the data collected reveals substantial consensus at the national level concerning all the main points with regard to the therapy. The recommendations expressed in this article can be considered as national guidelines and taken into account by the principal international implantation centers.

Sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of chronic pain after pelvic surgery.

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of sacral nerve modulation for chronic pelvic pain after pelvic or anal surgery for benign disease. METHOD: From January 2004 to December 2009, 17 (14 female; age 56 years) consecutive patients suffering from chronic pelvic pain underwent evaluation for sacral nerve modulation in three pelvic floor units. RESULTS: The previous surgery included stapled transanal rectal resection (five), hysterectomy (four), haemorrhoidectomy (two), stapled haemorrhoidopexy (one), fistulectomy (one), urethral sphincterotomy (one), appendicectomy (one), discectomy (one) and laparoscopy for endometriosis (one). Eight (47%) patients fulfilled the criteria for definitive implantation and were followed for a mean of 39 months. Using a visual analog pain score, pain levels fell from 8.2 preoperatively to 1.9, 2.1, 2.0 and 1.8 at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. Age < 60 years and duration of symptoms of < 24 months were good predictors and stapling was a poor predictor of success. CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve modulation seems to be effective over time in some patients with chronic pain related to previous surgery.

Sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain is a common condition that significantly compromises the quality of life of affected patients. Unfortunately, despite treatment procedures, the results are often ineffective and symptoms persist for years. For these reasons, the search for less aggressive treatment options with fewer negative consequences leading to minimally invasive techniques was conducted. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Moreover, we aimed to identify potential predictors of positive results of sacral neuromodulation through the comparison between failed and successful patients. PATIENTS: From January 2004 to December 2009, all consecutive patients suffering from chronic pelvic pain and tested for sacral nerve modulation in three pelvic floor dedicated centers were evaluated. Severity of symptoms were analyzed by a visual analog scale (VAS) RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (2 males; mean age, 53 years) were tested for sacral nerve modulation in the screening period and were included in the present study. The mean duration of pain was 51 months (range, 10-132 months). The mean preoperative VAS was 7.8 (range, 5-10). Previous pelvic surgery was reported in 18 patients (66.5%). Sixteen patients (59%) fulfil the successful criteria and were definitively implanted. The mean follow-up was 37 months (range, 12-71 months). The mean preoperative VAS was 8.1 (range, 6-8) and decreased to 2.1 ± 1.2 at 6-month follow-up (p < 0.0001), to 2.1 ± 1.1 at 12 months (16 patients), to 2.0 ± 1.2 at 24 months (13 patients), to 2.3 ± 1.4 at 36 months (9 patients), to 2.1 ± 1.5 at 48 months (5 patients), and to 1.9 ± 1.3 at 60 months (3 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Sacral neuromodulation proved to be effective in the treatment of some patients affected by chronic pelvic pain, and the effect persists over time. A positive screening phase and a positive response to gabapentin or pregabalin showed to be predictors of a successful response. Multiple localizations of pelvic pain and pain occurred after stapler surgery seem to be negative factors for the success of the treatment.

Treatment of slow-transit constipation with sacral nerve modulation.

AIM: Constipation is common and a selection of the best treatment is difficult, especially for slow-transit constipation (STC). The aim of the study was to assess the effect of sacral nerve modulation (SNM) on STC. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of patients with STC, treated with SNM was undertaken. All were evaluated by cinedefecography, colon transit-time, Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCS), SF-36 Quality of Life (QoL) and a bowel diary. Initially, all patients underwent a temporary implant for 4 weeks. The criteria of success were disappearance of necessity for laxatives or enema requirement, and improvement in QoL. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with STC were treated from March 2003 to May 2006. Nine (60%) underwent permanent implantation. After SNM, the mean improvement of Wexner Constipation Score (CCS) and QoL was 10 and 6.2 respectively. There were no complications. The mean follow-up period was 42 months. CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve modulation seems to be a useful option for STC.