Dupilumab dose spacing after initial successful treatment or adverse events in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective analysis.

Strategies on long-term management of patients affected by atopic dermatitis (AD) undergoing treatment with dupilumab achieving good clinical response (GCR) or experiencing dupilumab-related adverse events (AEs) are scant. Data of patients who implemented longer than scheduled dupilumab dosing interval due to GCR (at least 52 weeks of treatment and controlled AD activity [Eczema Area Severity Index ≤7 and Dermatology Life Quality Index ≤5 for at least 6 months]) or AEs (dupilumab-related and treatment-resistant conjunctivitis) were retrospectively collected. Dupilumab was tapered to Q3W or Q4W based on physician-patient shared decision. At baseline (T0) and each follow-up (week 16 [T1] and week 32 [T2]) disease severity was assessed. A total of 59 patients implemented longer than scheduled dosing interval (44 GCR, 15 AEs). Among these, 50 (35 GCR and 15 conjunctivitis) patients switched to 300 mg Q3W, while nine GCR subjects to Q4W. In the GCR group Q3W, 34 and 31 patients maintained clinical response at T1 and T2, whereas eight and seven Q4W subjects maintained clinical response at the same timepoints, respectively. No significant differences in AD severity were observed between T1 and T2 in both groups. Contrariwise, one Q3W and one Q4W patients at T1, and three Q3W and one Q4W subjects at T2, returned to dupilumab labeled dosage due to AD worsening. In conjunctivitis group, dupilumab Q3W was maintained in eight and four patients at T1 and T2, respectively. Three patients at T1 and three at T2 subjects returned to the labeled interval due to conjunctivitis remission. Four patients at T1 and four subjects at T2 interrupted dupilumab due to the persistence of conjunctivitis. A longer dupilumab dosing interval may be a valuable option in patients with a GCR and may be a useful strategy to reduce treatment-related conjunctivitis, also with pharmacoeconomic benefit.

Effectiveness and Safety of Long-Term Dupilumab Treatment in Elderly Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicenter Real-Life Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in treating elderly patients with atopic dermatitis from baseline to 52 weeks. METHODS: A retrospective observational real-life study was conducted in a group of elderly patients with severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab for 52 weeks. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 65 years; diagnosis of atopic dermatitis made by an expert dermatologist; Eczema Area and Severity Index ≥ 24; and a contraindication, side effects, or failure to respond to cyclosporine. The primary outcome was the mean percentage reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline to week 52. Secondary measures included the mean percentage reduction in the Pruritus and Sleep Numerical Rating Scales and the Dermatology Life Quality Index, and the types and rates of adverse events from baseline to week 52. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were eligible for the study. Flexural dermatitis was the most frequent clinical phenotype (63.8%). The coexistence of more than one clinical phenotype was found in 70/105 (66.6%) patients. We observed a reduction in all disease severity scores from baseline to week 52 (p < 0.001). Adverse events were recorded in 30/105 (28.6%) patients, with conjunctivitis and injection-site reaction the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, dupilumab is an effective and safe treatment for the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in patients aged over 65 years.

Vitamin D and psoriasis: an update for dermatologists and nutritionists.

Psoriasis is a common chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease, now considered a systemic inflammatory process with several comorbidities. The skin produces vitamin D by the action of ultraviolet light. Vitamin D performs various immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antifibrotic actions. The immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D offer opportunities to improve the treatment of several autoimmune diseases, such as psoriasis. In the literature, several significant associations are reported between low levels of vitamin D and psoriasis. Today, topical vitamin D represents an important therapeutic option due to its action on the proliferation and maturation of keratinocytes. The situation is different regarding the oral intake and integration of vitamin D in psoriasis patients. The use of vitamin D supplementation as an adjunctive treatment option in these patients is still discussed. This work aims to analyze the association between psoriasis and vitamin D levels according to dermatologists and nutritionists.

Psoriatic arthritis onset in psoriatic patients receiving UV phototherapy in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic, recurrent, and immune-mediated inflammatory disease that affects 2-3% of the world population. A substantial proportion of patients with psoriasis, approximately 40%, develop a form of inflammatory arthritis known as psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the arthritis follows the development of psoriasis, and it will develop simultaneously or possibly before the appearance of skin lesions. The presence of PsA indicates a need for more active intervention rather than purely topical therapies or UV-based therapies. The aim of this multicenter, retrospective, epidemiological study was to estimate the incidence of PsA in psoriatic patients receiving UV treatment as monotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective epidemiological study was performed in 8 dermatological reference center, located throughout Italy (2 from Northern, 3 from Center, 3 from Southern); a period of 1 year was considered. Data from the overall study population including 326 patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis were analyzed. Furthermore, data coming from follow-up visits, including screening for PsA onset through specific questionnaires were analyzed. RESULTS: PsA screening was positive in 27 patients (8.3%), whereas PsA diagnosis was confirmed by a rheumatologist in only 22/27 (81.5%) being therefore found in 22/326 (6.7%). Patients diagnosed with PsA had a statistically significantly higher abdominal circumference (96±15.3 vs. 88.9±18.3, P=0.048) and more commonly presented a positive past medical history for phototherapy (90.9% vs. 57.6% P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that phototherapy is not able to prevent or slow down the risk of PsA development in psoriatic patients. PsA screening should be always carried out in those patients even if asymptomatic, especially in obese subjects which are at great risk to develop PsA due to their increased systemic inflammatory state.

Vitamin D and its role in psoriasis: An overview of the dermatologist and nutritionist.

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. Psoriasis lesions are characterized by hyper-proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes associated with inflammatory cellular infiltrate in both dermis and epidermis. The epidermis is the natural source of vitamin D synthesis by sunlight action. Recently, a role for vitamin D in the pathogenesis of different skin diseases, including psoriasis, has been reported. Indeed, significant associations between low vitamin D status and psoriasis have been systematically observed. Due to its role in proliferation and maturation of keratinocytes, vitamin D has become an important local therapeutic option in the treatment of psoriasis. To date, the successful treatment based on adequate dietary intake of vitamin D or oral vitamin D supplementation in psoriasis represent an unmet clinical need and the evidence of its beneficial effects remains still controversial. This information is important either for Dermatologists and Nutritionists to increases the knowledge on the possible bi-directional relationships between low vitamin D status and psoriasis and on the potential usefulness of vitamin D in psoriasis with the aim not only to reduce its clinical severity, but also for delineating the risk profile for co-morbidities cardiac risk factors that may result from psoriasis. In the current review, we analyzed the possible bi-directional links between psoriatic disease and vitamin D.

Managing moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the elderly.

Managing psoriasis in the elderly can be difficult for physicians, who must consider comorbidities, the resulting polypharmacy, and progressive functional impairment of several organs. Indeed, topical agents are the first-line treatment for limited disease. Phototherapy is recommended if topical drugs are not sufficient and the patient has multiple comorbidities and risk factors that make them a poor candidate for an oral or injectable systemic agent. The most important pharmacokinetic alteration in the elderly population is the decreased excretory capacity of the kidney; thus, cyclosporine should be considered a last resort treatment, and the administered dose of methotrexate should be lowered according to the reduction in estimated creatinine clearance. Acitretin can be used in the absence of severe renal insufficiency, paying attention to lipid profile, treating eventual hyperlipidemia, and closely monitoring liver enzymes. Available data on biological drugs in the elderly are limited. Biologics are associated with a small but significant overall risk of infections. However, there is no convincing evidence that the relative risk of infection with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy increases with age. Nevertheless, the package inserts for biologics recommend caution when administering these medications to the geriatric population, due to the high baseline risk of infection in such patients. Etanercept seems to be well tolerated, possibly because of its lower immunosuppressive characteristics compared with other biologics. However, studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm its safety.