Using 3% retinol peeling and cosmeceuticals for the aesthetic wellness of the oncological patient after precautionary endocrine treatment: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Roughness, sagging, and skin rash are common in patients with breast cancer treated with LH-RH analog plus tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant postsurgical endocrine therapy. The use of topical retinol (vitamin A) has shown to be an efficacious cosmetic treatment. AIMS: Peeling with an advanced retinol peel formulation based on 3% retinol, 4% triethyl citrate, 0.1% aminophil, bisabolol, and 1% vitamin E acetate, in a vehicle in an alcoholic solution has been successfully used to ameliorate skin appearance on subjects with photodamage and in the aged population. We aimed to verify its use during adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS: Four subjects experiencing skin issues during postsurgical adjuvant therapy for their breast cancer received retinol peel at least 6 weeks after stopping their postsurgery therapy as a low invasive aesthetic medical treatment to be used both at the dermatology desk and at home. RESULTS: Retinol peel was effective, safe, and well-tolerated, improving skin brightness and firmness in all the patients, since 4 weeks after the beginning of the treatment. Patients declared to be satisfied with the treatment and their skin appearance letting them feel better for cancer recovery, too. CONCLUSION: These preliminary observations suggest that the use of an advanced retinol peel formulation might improve skin appearance in women experiencing skin damages caused by adjuvant therapy after breast cancer surgery.

Integration of Homeopathy and Complementary Medicine in the Tuscan Public Health System and the Experience of the Homeopathic Clinic of the Lucca Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: The healthcare programs of the Region of Tuscany (Italy) have started the process of integration of some types of complementary medicine (CM), including homeopathy, which began in 1996. The Homeopathic Clinic of Lucca was opened in 1998, followed by the Homeopathic Clinic for Women in 2003, and the Clinic for CM and Diet in Oncology in 2013. METHODS: Observational longitudinal studies conducted on 5,877 patients (3,937 in the general clinic, 1,606 in the women's clinic and 334 in oncology) were consecutively examined from 2003 to 2016. The Outcome in Relation to Impact on Daily Living (ORIDL) was generally used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Comparing the clinical conditions before and after homeopathic treatment, improvement was observed in 88.8% of general medicine patients with follow-up (45.1%); in particular, 68.1% of the patients had a major improvement in or resolution (ORIDL +2, +3, +4) of their condition. In women, an improvement was obtained in 74.1% cases and a major improvement in 61.2%. In cancer patients with homeopathic and integrative treatment, a significant improvement was observed for all the symptoms during anti-cancer therapy, particularly for hot flashes, nausea, depression, asthenia, and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that homeopathy can effectively be integrated with allopathic medicine and that the Tuscan experience could provide a useful reference for developing national and European regulations on the use of CM and homeopathy in public healthcare.

Activity of formestane in de novo tamoxifen-resistant patients with metastatic breast cancer.

In order to assess the feasibility of a sequential hormonal treatment after tamoxifen failure, 24 postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients (median age 60 years; ECOG PS < or = 1) were treated with formestane (4-hydroxyandrostenedione) 250 mg i.m. fortnightly; 19 patients were estrogen receptor-positive. The sites of metastatic disease were soft tissue in 22 patients, viscera in 9 and bone in 18. The patients were considered evaluable for tumor response after four doses of formestane. Objective responses were observed in 8/24 patients (33%) with one complete and seven partial responses. The median response duration was 9.5 months. The complete response was obtained on skin. We conclude that although the number of complete responses appears to be unsatisfactory, de novo tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer patients are suitable for further hormonal treatment with formestane.

Formestane: an effective first-line endocrine treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Formestane, a new selective aromatase inhibitor devoid of severe side-effects, has been shown to be active in patients with advanced breast cancer. To investigate the clinical activity and endocrinological effects of formestane as a first-line treatment, 52 patients were administered two different doses: 24 received 250 mg formestane and 28 received 500 mg formestane i.m. fortnightly. All of the patients had a performance status of 2 or less (ECOG scale), 34 (65%) had a disease-free interval of at least 2 years and 21 (40%) were both oestrogen-receptor- and progesterone-receptor-positive; 20 patients received hormone and 13, received chemotherapeutical adjuvant treatment. Objective responses were obtained in 8 patients in the 250-mg group (33%; 95% CI: 14%-52%) and in 13 patients in the 500-mg group (46%; 95% CI: 28%-64%). The median response duration in the two groups was respectively 11 and 12 months. E2 serum levels of oestradiol had significantly (P < 0.001) decreased to more than 40% below the baseline value in both groups after 15 days of treatment, and remained unchanged thereafter. Local and systemic tolerability was satisfactory. We conclude that formestane is an effective and well-tolerated agent in previously untreated patients, and that these results should be confirmed by further studies.

Efficacy and tolerability of 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) as first-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer after adjuvant therapy.

Aromatase inhibitors are known to be effective in the treatment of advanced postmenopausal breast cancer. To assess the efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA) as first-line treatment in patients who were either resistant to or had relapsed after adjuvant therapy, 50 eligible patients received intramuscular 4-OHA either 250 mg or 500 mg fortnightly until disease progression or severe adverse events. Of the 43 patients evaluable for clinical response (UICC criteria), 15 (36%) showed objective response (CR+PR), 6 (14%) stable disease (SD). In relation to disease site, objective responses were obtained in 55% of cases with soft tissue metastases (16/29); in 33% with visceral metastases (8/24), and in 24% with bone involvement (5/21). In relation to previous adjuvant treatment, there were eight objective responses among the 17 patients treated with chemotherapy (47%), and seven objective responses among the 24 treated with tamoxifen (29%). The treatment was well tolerated. These results support the hypothesis that adjuvant therapy, whether hormonal or chemotherapy, may make patients less responsive to subsequent treatment.