Multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, clinical phase II study to evaluate immunonutrition in improving efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, undergoing systematic nutritional counseling.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional support, including nutritional counseling and oral nutritional supplements (ONS), has been recommended as a first-line strategy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence on the efficacy of immunonutrition during immunotherapy in these patients is positive, but still limited some secondary endpoints, such as treatment toxicity and tolerance. We hypothesize that early systematic provision of ONS with a high-protein-high calorie mixture containing immunonutrients (Impact®) in addition to nutritional counseling, compared to nutritional counseling alone, is beneficial to patients with NSCLC receiving immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy. We designed the present study to evaluate the efficacy of early systematic provision of ONS enriched with immunonutrients compared to nutritional counseling alone, in patients with NSCLC undergoing immunotherapy. Study endpoints were: treatment response (primary endpoint: progression-free survival), treatment tolerance and toxicity, body weight, body composition, protein-calorie intake, quality of life, fatigue, muscle strength and immunological profile. METHODS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, open label, controlled, pilot clinical trial (N = 180). DISCUSSION: The improvement of efficacy of nutritional support in oncology still deserves many efforts. Immunonutrition represents a promising approach also in patients with NSCLC, but evidence on its efficacy on clinical outcomes during immunotherapy is still inconclusive. The present pilot study, which guarantees early high-quality nutritional care (assessment and treatment) to all patients in agreement with current guidelines and recommendations, could represent one of the first proofs of efficacy of early oral immunonutrition in patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy. Further large randomized trials addressing the improvement of supportive care could be hypothesized, accordingly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05384873.

Final results from a Phase II study of pemetrexed and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation after Pem-Cis induction in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVES: This single-arm multicenter Phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed (Pem) and cisplatin (Cis) induction chemotherapy (CT) followed by full-dose Pem-Cis plus concurrent radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced non-squamous NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable Stage III non-squamous NSCLC received two 21-day cycles of Pem 500 mg/m(2) (vitamin/folic acid supplementation and dexamethasone prophylaxis per Pem-label)+Cis 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1. Eligible patients who had not progressed continued with 2 further cycles of full-dose Pem-Cis plus concurrent RT (2 Gy/fraction, 5 days/week, 66 Gy total). Primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. RESULTS: Of 90 patients enrolled (all treated; median age 61 years, male/female 57%/43%, ECOG performance status 0/1 66%/34%, adenocarcinoma 90%, Stage III 36%/62%), 75 (83%) completed induction CT and started concurrent CT+RT. 64 (71%) patients received all 4 CT cycles and an RT dose ≥60 Gy. The 1-year PFS rate was 51.3% (95%CI: 42.0, 60.5). Median PFS was 10.6 months (95%CI: 8.6, 17.3), median OS was 26.2 months (95%CI: 16.7, not estimable). One patient died from enteritis (treatment-related) during Cycle 4. Four patients discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events, 1 on induction CT (renal failure), 3 on concurrent CT+RT (1 hypoacusis, 2 acute esophagitis). During induction CT, 18.9% of patients reported Grade 3/4 CTCAEs, only neutropenia (2.2%) and syncope (2.2%) were reported by >1 patient. During concurrent CT+RT, 41.3% of patients reported G3/4 CTCAEs, mainly esophagitis (12.0%), neutropenia (10.7%), and leukopenia (9.3%). CONCLUSION: In this study of Pem-Cis induction CT followed by full-dose Pem-Cis with concurrent RT, median PFS was 10.6 months and toxicity was manageable, in line with previous data on Pem-Cis plus RT.

Monotherapy Administration of Sorafenib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MISSION) Trial: A Phase III, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sorafenib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Predominantly Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after 2 or 3 Previous Treatment Regimens.

INTRODUCTION: Sorafenib monotherapy has shown benefits in phase II trials as third-/fourth-line treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The phase III, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled Monotherapy admInistration of Sorafenib in patientS wIth nOn-small-cell luNg cancer (MISSION) trial randomized patients with advanced relapsed/refractory NSCLC, following two or three prior treatment regimens, to sorafenib 400 mg twice a day (n = 350) or matching placebo (n = 353) plus best supportive care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression. Epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation status was analyzed in archival tumor and/or circulating tumor DNA from blood samples obtained during screening. RESULTS: Median OS was similar in the sorafenib and placebo groups (8.2 versus 8.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.17; p = 0.47). Median PFS (2.8 versus 1.4 mo; HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72; p < 0.0001), and time to progression (2.9 versus 1.4 mo; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.45-0.65; p < 0.0001) were significantly greater with sorafenib than with placebo. Among the 89 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, OS (13.9 versus 6.5 mo; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76; p = 0.002) and PFS (2.7 versus 1.4 mo; HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.46; p < 0.001) were significantly higher with sorafenib than placebo. PFS was significantly longer with sorafenib than placebo in patients with either wild-type or mutated KRAS, but OS was similar. Common drug-related adverse events were rash/desquamation, diarrhea, and fatigue, consistent with the safety profile of sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Third-/fourth-line sorafenib therapy did not significantly increase OS in patients with relapsed/refractory NSCLC, despite significantly increasing PFS.

Current state-of-the-art therapy for advanced squamous cell lung cancer.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) represents the second most common histologic subtype of lung cancer (preceded only by adenocarcinoma). SSC of the lung is prevalently diagnosed in smokers and has been described as a preferentially centrally located tumor in which the main airways are commonly involved. Clinically, it presents with predominant locoregional signs and symptoms, but in recent years an increasing frequency of peripheral SCC of the lung has been reported. Pathologic diagnosis can be easily made through light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. The treatment approach for early-stage disease does not differ from that of other histologic subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer; in locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease, doublet chemotherapy regimens (including cisplatin or carboplatin and a third-generation agent such as gemcitabine, taxanes, or vinorelbine) remain the cornerstone of front-line systemic treatment. Conversely, a single agent, mainly docetaxel, is the preferred treatment in second-line treatment. In unselected patient populations, targeted therapies have been extensively tested in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy with disappointing results because of increased toxicity or lack of improvement in efficacy outcomes. Genomic alterations in SCC of the lung have not been comprehensively characterized, and no molecularly targeted therapies have been specifically developed for the treatment of this disease, but recently immune checkpoints have emerged as new therapeutic agent.

Early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer assessed by [18F]-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate that patients who exhibit a tumor metabolic response to first-line chemotherapy seen on FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) would survive longer than those who did not show such a response, comparing this evaluation with the morphologic response seen on CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Images were acquired in 22 consecutive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) randomized to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel/sorafenib or placebo. FDG-PET was performed within 4 weeks before (PET1) and 2 weeks after starting treatment (PET2). Similarly, CT (CT1) was performed at baseline and then every 2 cycles (6 weeks) during treatment (CT2). Responders and nonresponders were identified with FDG-PET, and metabolic response was then compared with morphologic changes detected by spiral CT. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 22 patients completed this study. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (45 vs. 22.2 weeks) and overall survival (OS) (77 vs. 47.7 weeks), we observed a trend that was not statistically significant for patients whose response after 2 weeks of treatment was seen on FDG-PET (P = .22 for PFS; P = .15 for OS). CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced NSCLC who had a positive outcome, as evidenced by prolonged survival, were those who showed a tumor metabolic response seen on FDG-PET.

Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE This phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naïve patients with unresectable stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Nine hundred twenty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive up to six 21-day cycles of carboplatin area under the curve 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) (CP) on day 1, followed by either sorafenib 400 mg twice a day (n = 464, arm A) or placebo (n = 462, arm B) on days 2 to 19. The maintenance phase after CP consisted of sorafenib 400 mg or placebo twice a day. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival and tumor response. RESULTS Overall demographics were balanced between arms; 223 patients (24%) had squamous cell histology. On the basis of a planned interim analysis, median OS was 10.7 months in arm A and 10.6 months in arm B (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.41; P = .915). The study was terminated after the interim analysis concluded that the study was highly unlikely to meet its primary end point. A prespecified exploratory analysis revealed that patients with squamous cell histology had greater mortality in arm A than in arm B (HR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.81). Main grade 3 or 4 sorafenib-related toxicities included rash (8.4%), hand-foot skin reaction (7.8%), and diarrhea (3.5%). CONCLUSION No clinical benefit was observed from adding sorafenib to CP chemotherapy as first-line treatment for NSCLC.

Phase II study of pemetrexed-gemcitabine combination in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin is one of the most active agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is also known for significant toxicity, which makes it unsuitable for certain patients. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a promising cisplatin-free combination, gemcitabine plus pemetrexed, in NSCLC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Chemo-naive patients with inoperable NSCLC were eligible for this study. Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1 and 8, followed by intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) on day 8. After inclusion of 13 patients, folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation was added to lower pemetrexed-induced toxicity. Quality of life was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. RESULTS: Sixty patients enrolled; 58 were evaluable for response. All patients had a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. Eighty-seven percent had stage IV disease. Nine patients had a confirmed partial response [overall response rate, 15.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.3-27.4%]. Twenty-nine (50.0%) patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.0 months), with a 1- and 2-year overall survival of 42.6% (95% CI, 30.0-55.3%) and 18.5% (95% CI, 7.9-29.1%). Median progression-free survival was 5.0 months. Median response duration was 3.3 months. There were no deaths attributed to treatment. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (61.7%), febrile neutropenia (16.7%), fatigue (23.3%), and elevations of aspartate aminotransferase (15.0%) and alanine aminotransferase (20.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This combination had good tolerance and achieved promising overall survival with extended 1- and 2-year survival rates. This cisplatin-free regimen warrants further evaluation in randomized trials.

Pemetrexed in front-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Pemetrexed (Alimta) possesses broad antitumor activity. It has been evaluated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as front-line chemotherapy in a comprehensive phase II evaluation. While various antifolates have been previously evaluated in clinical trials, drug development was stopped or delayed in light of their lack of efficacy or occurrence of life-threatening toxicities. While similar trends were observed with pemetrexed early in development, investigators instituted folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation to minimize these toxicities without hampering drug efficacy. This article briefly summarizes the current evidence that supports the role of pemetrexed-based combinations in clinical trials for chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC.

Pemetrexed and its emerging role in the treatment of thoracic malignancies.

Pemetrexed (Alimta); Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN, USA) is a unique multitargeted antifolate that inhibits at least three enzymes, thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. This novel drug is being evaluated in a comprehensive clinical programme for use in both front-line and second-line therapies. It has shown broad activity in a number of solid tumours, including colon cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, head and neck, cervical cancer and others. While a number of antifolates have been evaluated in clinical trials, further development has been stopped or delayed by the occurrence of life-threatening toxicities. Similar trends were also initially observed with pemetrexed as well, but investigators later showed that these toxicities could be minimised with folic acid and vitamin B(12) supplementation included in the treatment regimen. Preliminary data indicate that this supplementation does not hamper drug efficacy in most tumour types and in many cases, supplemented patients exhibit improved clinical outcome. Here, the current data for pemetrexed in treating thoracic malignancies are reviewed, with special focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer.