Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Cancer Control ; 30: 10732748231185047, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37339926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have established that higher baseline quality of life (QOL) scores are associated with improved survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We examined the relationship between overall survival (OS) and baseline QOL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1 247 patients with mCRC participating in N9741 (comparing bolus 5-FU/LV, irinotecan [IFL] vs infusional 5-FU/leucovorin [LV]/oxaliplatin [FOLFOX] vs. irinotecan/oxaliplatin [IROX]) provided data at baseline on overall QOL using a single-item linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) 0-100 point scale. The association of OS according to clinically deficient (defined as CD-QOL, score 0-50) vs not clinically deficient (nCD-QOL, score 51-100) baseline QOL scores was tested. A multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to adjust for the effects of multiple baseline factors. An exploratory analysis was performed evaluating OS according to baseline QOL status among patients who did or did not receive second-line therapy. RESULTS: Baseline QOL was a strong predictor of OS for the whole cohort (CD-QOL vs nCD-QOL: 11.2 months vs 18.4 months, P < .0001), and in each arm IFL 12.4 vs 15.1 months, FOLFOX 11.1 months vs 20.6 months, and IROX 8.9 months vs 18.1 months. Baseline QOL was associated with baseline performance status (PS) (P < .0001). After adjusting for PS and treatment arm, baseline QOL was still associated with OS (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline QOL is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with mCRC. The demonstration that patient-assessed QOL and PS are independent prognostic indicators suggests that these assessments provide important complementary prognostic information.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Quality of Life , Camptothecin , Prognosis , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Leucovorin/therapeutic use
2.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 20(6): e661-e666, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31378618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emerging research is highlighting the importance of spirituality in cancer survivorship as well as the importance of early distress screening. The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the relationships among spirituality, emotional distress, and sociodemographic variables during the early period of lung cancer survivorship. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred sixty-four lung cancer survivors completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being, and the Short-Form-8 for emotional distress within the first year after lung cancer diagnosis, and 474 of these survivors completed the survey again 1 year later. RESULTS: At baseline, spirituality was associated with lower prevalence of emotional distress, being married, fewer years of cigarette smoking, and better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Additionally, high baseline spirituality was associated with lower rates of high emotional distress at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that spirituality might serve as a protective factor for emotional distress among lung cancer survivors. Further research is warranted to explore the role of spirituality in promoting distress management among lung cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Psychological Distress , Spirituality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cancer Survivors , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Lancet Oncol ; 17(5): 663-70, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27083333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditional methods of reporting adverse events in clinical trials are inadequate for modern cancer treatments with chronic administration. Conventional analysis and display of maximum grade adverse events do not capture toxicity profiles that evolve over time or longer lasting, lower grade toxic effects; we aimed to address this shortcoming in this study. METHODS: We developed an analytic approach and standardised, comprehensive format, the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) approach, which combines graphs and adverse event tabular displays with multiple longitudinal statistical techniques into a readily applicable method to study toxic effects. Plots visualising summary statistics or individual patient data over discrete timepoints were combined with statistical methods including the following longitudinal techniques: repeated measures models that describe the changes in adverse events across all cycles of treatment; time-to-event analyses of first and worst grade toxicity; and area under the curve (AUC) analyses summarising adverse event profiles over the entire course of a study, including chronic low-grade events. We applied ToxT analysis to adverse event data from two completed North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG/Alliance) trials: N9741 (NCT00003594), in which different combinations of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan were investigated for metastatic colorectal cancer, and 979254, in which survivors of breast cancer were given venlafaxine or placebo for control of hot flashes. FINDINGS: In trial NCCTG 979254 there was a higher incidence of late-occurring dry mouth in patients who were given venlafaxine than in those given placebo (week 1 [baseline]: 13% [six incidence in 48 patients, SD 5] vs 22% [11/49, SD 6]; p=0·20; week 5: 49% [24/49, 7] vs 2% [1/46, 2]; p<0·0001). In trial NCCTG N9741 there was an increased incidence of early nausea for patients given irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (IROX) compared with those given 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; cycle 1 mean grade nausea 1·1 [SD 1·0] vs 0·6 [0·7]; p<0·0001). Event charts showed earlier occurrences of higher grades of diarrhoea for patients given IROX compared with those given FOLFOX, and the AUC analysis shows a higher magnitude of diarrhoea consistently over time throughout the study in patients given IROX versus those given FOLFOX (mean AUC 4·2 [SD 5·2] vs 2·9 [4·2]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: The ToxT analytical approach incorporates the dimension of time into adverse event assessment and offers a more comprehensive depiction of toxic effects than present methods. With new, continuously administered targeted agents, immunotherapy, and maintenance regimens, these improved longitudinal analyses are directly relevant to patients and are crucial in cancer clinical trials. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and the Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Long Term Adverse Effects/pathology , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Camptothecin/adverse effects , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Clinical Trials as Topic , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Irinotecan , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Long Term Adverse Effects/classification , Male , Middle Aged , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Oxaliplatin
4.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 39(3): 271-5, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24921218

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this was to determine survival after starting neoadjuvant therapy for patients who became ineligible for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Since January 1993, 215 patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma began treatment with planned OLT. Treatment included external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with fluorouracil, bile duct brachytherapy, and postradiotherapy fluorouracil or capecitabine before OLT. Adverse findings at the staging operation, death, and other factors precluded OLT in 63 patients (29%), of whom 61 completed neoadjuvant chemoradiation. RESULTS: By October 2012, 56 (89%) of the 63 patients unable to undergo OLT had died. Twenty-two patients (35%) became ineligible for OLT before the staging operation, 38 (60%) at the staging operation, and 3 (5%) after staging. From the date of diagnosis, median overall survival was 12.3 months. Survival was 17% at 18 months and 7% at 24 months. Median survival after fallout was 6.8 months. Median survival after the staging operation was 6 months. Two patients lived for 3.7 and 8.7 years before dying of cancer or liver failure caused by persistent biliary stricture at the site of the original cancer, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that time from diagnosis to fallout correlated with overall survival (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In highly selected patients initially suitable for OLT, the mortality rate for cholangiocarcinoma was high in patients who became ineligible for OLT. Their survival, however, was comparable to expected survival for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease treated with nontransplant therapies. The most common reason for patient fallout was adverse findings at the staging operation.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Bile Duct Neoplasms/therapy , Brachytherapy , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Cholangiocarcinoma/therapy , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Survival Rate
5.
J Pastoral Care Counsel ; 69(3): 156-62, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26463853

ABSTRACT

Patients with lung cancer report more disease burden and lower spiritual well-being (SWB) compared with other cancer patients. Understanding variables that lessen disease burden and improve SWB is essential. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between motivational level for physical activity and SWB in patients with lung cancer. Linear regression showed increased SWB as stage of change for physical activity increased (p < 0.0001), even after adjusting for multiple demographic variables.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Spirituality , Survivors/psychology , Aged , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Religion and Psychology
6.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 92(3): 650-8, 2015 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25936812

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this single-institution pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of an oil-based skin agent, Ultra Emu Oil, on skin-related toxicity in patients undergoing radiation therapy to the breast or chest wall. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were randomized 2:1 in a double-blind fashion and were instructed to apply processed Ultra Emu Oil or placebo (cottonseed oil) twice daily during the course of radiation therapy. The oils were applied before the third fraction and continued for 6 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary endpoint was the area under the curve (AUC) of Skindex-16 scale scores over time. Secondary outcomes included maximum grade of radiation dermatitis using the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) for Adverse Events (CTCAE 3.0), the Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool, quality of life (QOL) measured by Linear Analogue Self-Assessment, and a symptom experience diary (SED). RESULTS: In all, 42 of 45 patients completed the study and were evaluable. The median times to peak rash, skin redness, peeling, and skin swelling were weeks 6, 6, 7, and 7, respectively as measured by the SED. The Skindex AUC scores tended to be lower in emu oil patients than in placebo patients (mean total AUC 7.2 vs 10.4, respectively). This trend was also seen in all the Skindex subdomains. The overall QOL was slightly better in the emu oil group but remained stable throughout the study for both arms. Peak CTC toxicity occurred at week 6. Patients using emu oil appeared slightly worse on maximum CTC grade, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study confirmed the safety of oil-based skin treatments during radiation therapy and suggests a trend for reduced skin toxicity for patients receiving emu oil. A larger study is needed to evaluate the efficacy of emu oil in reducing radiation dermatitis in patients receiving breast radiation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Oils/administration & dosage , Radiation-Protective Agents/administration & dosage , Radiodermatitis/prevention & control , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Area Under Curve , Breast/radiation effects , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Cottonseed Oil/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Erythema/etiology , Exanthema/etiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Oils/adverse effects , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Radiation-Protective Agents/adverse effects , Radiodermatitis/pathology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Thoracic Wall/radiation effects
7.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(7): 1939-46, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23420557

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Spiritual well-being (SWB) among lung cancer survivors has not been well-delineated. Additionally, little is known about how SWB is affected over the trajectory of the disease process. The aims of this study were to examine the SWB of individuals with a diagnosis of lung cancer, to assess the stability of SWB over time, and to identify the factors associated with SWB. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with lung cancer first seen at the Mayo Clinic over a 10-year period of time was included in this study. Study entry was at the time of diagnosis or referral to the Mayo Clinic, and participation involved annual survey using the Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being, Medical Outcome Short Form 8, and Quality of Life (QOL) Linear Analog Scale Assessment. Associations were explored using Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman correlations. Linear regression was used to explore multivariate relationships. RESULTS: There were 1,578 participants over a 10-year period of time. Group SWB scores were relatively high and stable over a 10-year period of time ([Formula: see text], standard deviation = 14.47-18.46, possible scale of 0-100). However, individual scores varied widely across almost the entire scale (2.1-100) and revealed a chaotic trajectory for SWB. Males, current smokers, and those with higher pack-years experienced lower SWB compared to females, nonsmokers, and those with lower pack-years (p < 0.0001, 0.0455, and 0.0004, respectively). SWB was strongly associated with overall QOL. CONCLUSIONS: SWB is an individualistic experience that can change dramatically over time for cancer survivors. Ongoing assessments are important.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Spirituality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Religion and Psychology , Survivors
8.
Support Care Cancer ; 21(4): 1185-92, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23150188

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing treatment for cancer often report problems with their cognitive function, which is an essential component of health-related quality of life. Pursuant to this, a two-arm randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III clinical trial was conducted to evaluate Ginkgo biloba (EGB 761) for the prevention of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Previously chemotherapy naïve women about to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer were randomized to receive 60 mg of EGB 761 or a matching placebo twice daily. The study agent was to begin before their second cycle of chemotherapy and to be taken throughout chemotherapy and 1 month beyond completion. The primary measure for cognitive function was the High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen (HSCS), with a secondary measure being the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B. Subjective assessment of cognitive function was evaluated by the cognitive subscale of the Perceived Health Scale (PHS) and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Data were collected at baseline and at intervals throughout and after chemotherapy, up to 24 months after completion of adjuvant treatment. The primary statistical analysis included normalized area under the curve (AUC) comparisons of the HSCS, between the arms. Secondary analyses included evaluation of the other measures of cognition as well as correlational analyses between self-report and cognitive testing. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six women provided evaluable data. There were no significant differences in AUC up to 12 months on the HSCS between arms at the end of chemotherapy or at any other time point after adjuvant treatment. There were also no significant differences in TMT A or B at any data point. Perceived cognitive functions, as measured by the PHS and confusion/bewilderment subscale of the POMS, were not different between arms at the end of chemotherapy. There was also little correlation between self-reported cognition and cognitive testing. No differences were observed in toxicities per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) assessment between Ginkgo biloba and placebo throughout the study; however, after chemotherapy, the placebo group reported worse nausea (p = .05). CONCLUSION: This study did not provide any support for the notion that Ginkgo biloba, at a dose of 60 mg twice a day, can help prevent cognitive changes from chemotherapy. These analyses do provide data to further support the low associations between patients' self-report of cognition and cognitive performance, based on more formal testing.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cognition Disorders/prevention & control , Ginkgo biloba , Phytotherapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Cognition Disorders/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Self Report , United States
9.
Am J Chin Med ; 39(6): 1117-29, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22083985

ABSTRACT

Noncyclic breast pain is a common breast disorder prompting women to seek medical evaluation. We aimed to perform a pilot study on the relief of noncyclic breast pain using acupuncture. Thirty-seven women seen at a diagnostic breast clinic between April 2003 and January 2009 were enrolled. Treatment consisted of four acupuncture sessions over two weeks, with three months of follow-up. Response to treatment was measured with use of a breast pain questionnaire, a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire, and the Cleeland Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and three months after treatment. Data were analyzed using standard descriptive statistics. Twenty-two patients completed four acupuncture sessions. Pain described as throbbing and heavy decreased significantly after acupuncture (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). After treatment, pain scores (on the 10-point BPI scale) decreased by an average of 3.5 points for the worst pain during the previous month (p = 0.001), by 2.7 points for average pain (p < 0.001), and by 2.3 points for pain interference (p = 0.002). The percentage of patients reporting a clinically meaningful decrease of 2 points from baseline to the end of treatment included 67% (12/18) for the worst pain, 65% (11/17) for average pain, and 56% (10/18) for pain interference. QOL data showed no improvement in QOL measures (mental, physical, emotional, social, or spiritual well-being). The results of this preliminary study suggest that a randomized controlled trial may be warranted to evaluate the effect of acupuncture on noncyclic breast pain, as well as the optimal frequency of acupuncture treatments.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Mastodynia/therapy , Acupuncture Points , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mastodynia/etiology , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
J Clin Oncol ; 29(1): 97-105, 2011 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21098317

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Functional iron deficiency may impair response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in iron-replete patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia (CAA). This study evaluated whether coadministration of parenteral iron improves ESA efficacy in patients with CAA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial enrolled 502 patients with hemoglobin (Hb) less than 11 g/dL who were undergoing chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies. All patients received darbepoetin alfa once every 3 weeks and were randomly assigned to receive either ferric gluconate 187.5 mg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks, oral daily ferrous sulfate 325 mg, or oral placebo for 16 weeks. RESULTS: There was no difference in the erythropoietic response rate (ie, proportion of patients achieving Hb ≥ 12 g/dL or Hb increase ≥ 2 g/dL from baseline): 69.5% (95% CI, 61.9% to 76.5%) of IV iron-treated patients achieved an erythropoietic response compared with 66.9% (95% CI, 59.1% to 74.0%) who received oral iron and 65.0% (95% CI, 57.2% to 72.3%) who received oral placebo (P = .75). There were also no differences in the proportion of patients requiring red cell transfusions, changes in quality of life, or the dose of darbepoetin administered. Adverse events (AEs) tended to be more common in the IV iron arm: grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 54% (95% CI, 46% to 61%) of patients receiving IV iron compared with 44% (95% CI, 36% to 52%) who received oral iron and 46% (95% CI, 38% to 54%) who received oral placebo (P = .16). CONCLUSION: In patients with CAA, addition of IV ferric gluconate to darbepoetin failed to provide additional benefit compared with oral iron or oral placebo.


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Erythropoietin/analogs & derivatives , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Iron/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Anemia/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Darbepoetin alfa , Dietary Supplements , Erythropoietin/administration & dosage , Female , Ferric Compounds/administration & dosage , Humans , Iron/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prospective Studies
11.
J Clin Oncol ; 29(4): 421-7, 2011 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21189381

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cumulative sensory neurotoxicity (sNT) is the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin, which commonly leads to early discontinuation of oxaliplatin-based therapy in the palliative and adjuvant settings. In a nonrandomized, retrospective study, intravenous (IV) calcium/magnesium (Ca/Mg) was associated with reduced oxaliplatin-induced sNT. METHODS: Patients with colon cancer undergoing adjuvant therapy with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) were randomly assigned to Ca/Mg (1g calcium gluconate plus 1g magnesium sulfate pre- and post-oxaliplatin) or placebo, in a double-blinded manner. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with grade 2 or greater sNT at any time during or after oxaliplatin-based therapy by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; version 3) criteria. An oxaliplatin-specific sNT scale and patient questionnaires were also used to assess sNT. After 104 of 300 planned patients were enrolled, the study was closed. This was due to preliminary reports from another trial that suggested that Ca/Mg decreased treatment efficacy; these data were subsequently found to be incorrect. RESULTS: Overall, 102 patients were available for analysis. Ca/Mg decreased the incidence of chronic, cumulative, grade 2 or greater sNT, as measured by NCI CTCAE (P = .038) and also by the oxaliplatin-specific sNT scale (P = .018). In addition, acute muscle spasms associated with oxaliplatin were significantly reduced (P = .01) No effect on acute, cold-induced sNT was found. No substantial differences in adverse effects were noted between Ca/Mg and placebo. CONCLUSION: Despite early termination and decreased statistical power, this study supports IV Ca/Mg as an effective neuroprotectant against oxaliplatin-induced cumulative sNT in adjuvant colon cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Calcium Gluconate/administration & dosage , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Magnesium Sulfate/administration & dosage , Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/prevention & control , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Sensation Disorders/prevention & control , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Chi-Square Distribution , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Early Termination of Clinical Trials , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/diagnosis , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/etiology , Oxaliplatin , Prospective Studies , Sensation Disorders/chemically induced , Sensation Disorders/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Menopause ; 15(4 Pt 1): 655-60, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18427355

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This project was designed to provide an overview of hot flash studies conducted over the past two decades at the Mayo Clinic and in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trials performed by these investigators are illustrated, described, and discussed. RESULTS: Ten randomized, controlled (eight placebo controlled), double-blind clinical trials were conducted involving a total of 1,581 women and three placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials involving a total of 329 men were conducted. In addition, 14 pilot trials, having involved more than 325 participants to date, were conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the pilot trials have given direction for substances that ought to be further explored in more definitive studies. In men, randomized studies demonstrate that hot flashes are markedly decreased by low doses of megestrol acetate, moderately decreased by gabapentin, but not substantially decreased by clonidine. Results from the randomized trials in women demonstrate that hot flashes are markedly decreased by relatively low doses of progestational agents (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate), moderately decreased by venlafaxine, mildly to moderately decreased by fluoxetine, mildly decreased by clonidine, but not substantially decreased by vitamin E, a soy phytoestrogen product, or black cohosh. Last, the data investigated in these studies support the hypothesis that, for the treatment of hot flashes in women, the results of therapeutic maneuvers are similar regardless of whether the patient has a history of breast cancer and/or is taking tamoxifen.


Subject(s)
Hot Flashes/drug therapy , Female , Hot Flashes/etiology , Humans , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
13.
J Soc Integr Oncol ; 5(3): 106-12, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17761129

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate, in a phase 2 pilot study, tolerability and the effect of 6 weeks of flaxseed therapy on hot flash scores in women not wishing to receive estrogen therapy. Eligibility included 14 hot flashes per week for at least 1 month. In the baseline week, participants took no study medication and documented the characteristics of their hot flashes. Thereafter, crushed flaxseed was administered at 40 g daily. Participants provided weekly toxicity reports and health-related quality of life information. The primary end point was a change in hot flash score prospectively reported in a daily hot flash diary. Thirty women were enrolled between June 17 and November 8, 2005. The mean decrease in hot flash scores after flaxseed therapy was 57% (median decrease 62%). The mean reduction in daily hot flash frequency was 50% (median reduction 50%), from 7.3 hot flashes to 3.6. Fourteen of the 28 participants (50%) experienced mild or moderate abdominal distention. Eight participants (29%) experienced mild diarrhea, one experienced flatulence, and six (21%) withdrew because of toxicities. This study suggests that dietary therapy decreases hot flash activity in women not taking estrogen therapy. This reduction is greater than what would be expected with placebo.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Hot Flashes/diet therapy , Linseed Oil/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Lignin/therapeutic use , Linseed Oil/adverse effects , Linseed Oil/pharmacology , Menopause/drug effects , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Psychological Tests , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
J Clin Oncol ; 24(18): 2836-41, 2006 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16782922

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Hot flashes can cause significant morbidity in postmenopausal women undergoing or finished with breast cancer treatment. Black cohosh has been used to treat hot flashes, but definitive clinical data about efficacy have been equivocal. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, cross-over clinical trial with two 4-week periods, was used to study the efficacy of black cohosh (1 capsule, Cimicifuga racemosa 20 mg BID) for the treatment of hot flashes in women. Participants kept a daily hot flash diary during a baseline week and then during two 4-week crossover treatment periods. Hot flash scores were measured by assigning points (1 to 4 for mild to very severe) to each hot flash based on severity and then adding the points for a given time period. RESULTS: Between October 31, 2003, to March 4, 2004, 132 patients were randomly assigned. Toxicity was minimal and not different by treatment group. Patients receiving black cohosh reported a mean decrease in hot flash score of 20% (comparing the fourth treatment week to the baseline week) compared with a 27% decrease for patients on placebo (P = .53). Mean hot flash frequency was reduced 17% on black cohosh and 26% on placebo (P = .36). Patient treatment preferences were measured after completion of both treatment periods by ascertaining which treatment period, if any, the patient preferred. Thirty-four percent of patients preferred the black cohosh treatment, 38% preferred the placebo, and 28% did not prefer either treatment. CONCLUSION: This trial failed to provide any evidence that black cohosh reduced hot flashes more than the placebo.


Subject(s)
Cimicifuga , Hot Flashes/drug therapy , Phytotherapy , Plant Preparations/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Menopause , Middle Aged
15.
Cancer Invest ; 22(4): 515-21, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15565808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hot flashes cause significant morbidity in postmenopausal women, including women with breast cancer. We undertook a pilot study to estimate the effectiveness of black cohosh to reduce hot flashes. METHODS: Women who reported significant hot flashes (> or = 14 per week) were enrolled. Black cohosh was given in the form of the commercial product Remifemin. The first week was a no-treatment baseline period, and therapy was given for the subsequent 4 weeks. Hot flash data were collected by daily questionnaires during baseline and treatment weeks. Adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-one women completed the study. Their mean age was 56 years (range, 38-80). Thirteen patients had a history of breast cancer. Six patients were taking tamoxifen or raloxifene. Patients reported an average of 8.3 hot flashes per day during the baseline week. The reduction in mean daily hot flash frequency was 50% (95% CI, 34%-65%), while weekly hot flash scores were reduced 56% (95% CI, 40%-71%) at completion of the study. Overall, patients reported less trouble with sleeping, less fatigue, and less abnormal sweating. No patients stopped therapy because of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Black cohosh appeared to reduce hot flashes and had a low toxicity. The efficacy found in this trial seems to be more than would be expected by a placebo effect (20%-30% hot flash reduction in previous trials). These results suggest that further evaluation of this black cohosh preparation with a phase III randomized trial is indicated.


Subject(s)
Cimicifuga , Hot Flashes/drug therapy , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Postmenopause
16.
J Clin Oncol ; 22(12): 2469-76, 2004 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15197210

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Studies suggest eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), an omega-3 fatty acid, augments weight, appetite, and survival in cancer-associated wasting. This study determined whether an EPA supplement-administered alone or with megestrol acetate (MA)-was more effective than MA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty-one assessable patients with cancer-associated wasting were randomly assigned to an EPA supplement 1.09 g administered bid plus placebo; MA liquid suspension 600 mg/d plus an isocaloric, isonitrogenous supplement administered twice a day; or both. Eligible patients reported a 5-lb, 2-month weight loss and/or intake of less than 20 calories/kg/d. RESULTS: A smaller percentage taking the EPA supplement gained >or= 10% of baseline weight compared with those taking MA: 6% v 18%, respectively (P =.004). Combination therapy resulted in weight gain of >or= 10% in 11% of patients (P =.17 across all arms). The percentage of patients with appetite improvement (North Central Cancer Treatment Group Questionnaire) was not statistically different: 63%, 69%, and 66%, in EPA-, MA-, and combination-treated arms, respectively (P =.69). In contrast, 4-week Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy scores suggested MA-containing arms experienced superior appetite stimulation compared with the EPA arm, with scores of 40, 55, and 55 in EPA-, MA-, and combination-treated arms, respectively (P =.004). Survival was not significantly different among arms. Global quality of life was not significantly different among groups. With the exception of increased impotence in MA-treated patients, toxicity was comparable. CONCLUSION: This EPA supplement, either alone or in combination with MA, does not improve weight or appetite better than MA alone.


Subject(s)
Eicosapentaenoic Acid/administration & dosage , Megestrol Acetate/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/complications , Wasting Syndrome/drug therapy , Aged , Appetite/drug effects , Appetite Stimulants/administration & dosage , Body Weight , Canada , Dietary Supplements , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Survival Rate
17.
J Clin Oncol ; 20(6): 1491-8, 2002 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11896096

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The toxicity profile of fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy given on 5 consecutive days at doses of 370 to 450 mg/m(2) has been well documented. A meta-analysis of six North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) cancer control trials involving 786 patients indicated that women treated with this type of regimen experienced more severe stomatitis and leukopenia than men. After these findings, an additional meta-analysis of the toxicity profiles on five NCCTG colorectal cancer treatment trials was undertaken. METHODS: Data for 1,093 women and 1,355 men from 12 different treatment arms were included. The primary end points were the incidence of stomatitis, leukopenia, alopecia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, recorded with standard National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. Fisher's exact test was used to compare incidence and severity across sexes, supplemented by Forrest meta-analysis plots and logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of four out of six toxicities studied was significantly greater for women than men; the exceptions were severe nausea and vomiting. Overall, almost half of the women compared with a third of the men experienced severe toxicity (P <.0001). Logistic regression confirmed the univariate findings while adjusting for the effects of study, dose, body mass index, and age. The differences were consistent across treatment cycles. Response rates and survival distributions were the same for both sexes. CONCLUSION: This study confirms an earlier finding that women receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy in a 5-day bolus schedule experience toxicity more frequently and with more severity than men. These data raise the question of whether the recommended initial dose of 5-FU-based chemotherapy for women should be lower than that for men.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Stomatitis/chemically induced , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL