Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0200824, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059523

ABSTRACT

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)], are chronic relapsing disorders of unknown etiology. The aim of this study was to determine demographic features, disease phenotypes, medical and surgical therapies in our IBD patients and to identify which parameters are in association with the need of surgery and/or biologic therapy. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were analyzed from the IBD registry of the 1st Department of Medicine, University of Szeged. The study period was between January 2007 and March 2015. Data of 911 IBD patients (428 CD, 483 UC) were analyzed. The median lag time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis proved to be significantly longer in UC than in CD (4.6 years vs. 2.1 years, p = 0.01). 40% of the patients received biological therapy, 301 patients underwent surgery required more frequently for CD than UC. Surgery was more common in CD patients with ileal location and penetrating behaviour. In UC, more severe disease onset predicted to unfavourable disease course. Higher proportion of surgery was shown in patient aged above 40 years in both CD and UC. Diagnostic delay of more than 1 year and appendectomy predicted to unfavourable disease outcome of both CD and UC. This analysis revealed that more than 1 year of diagnostic delay, disease activity at diagnosis in UC, CD, ileal location and penetrating behaviour are factors that may influence disease outcome. Use of thiopurines seemed to be protective in UC.


Subject(s)
Biological Therapy/methods , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Crohn Disease/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Crohn Disease/surgery , Data Analysis , Delayed Diagnosis , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Hungary , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Registries , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
2.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 50(2): 174-81, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25384624

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Influenza vaccination is recommended for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients on immunosuppressive therapy. The objective was to evaluate the antibody and cell-mediated immune response to the split and whole virion influenza vaccine in patients with IBD treated with anti-TNF-α and immunosuppressive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six immunocompromised IBD patients were vaccinated. Fifty-three patients (control group) refused vaccination. Split virion vaccine and whole virion vaccine were used. Serum samples were obtained for pre- and postimmunization antibody titers to influenza vaccine (A/California/7/2009 [H1N1], A/Victoria/361/2011 [H3N2], B/Wisconsin/1/2010-like B/Hubei-Wujiagang/158/2009). Cell-mediated response was evaluated using an interferon (INF)-γ, interleukine (IL)-2 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α ELISA. RESULTS: Postimmunization titers of both influenza subtypes increased significantly after the administration of split virion vaccines compared to the controls and to those who received whole virion vaccine. The antibody titers of Influenza B also increased significantly in patients immunized with split vaccine and treated with anti-TNF-α therapy. After influenza vaccination, the level of serum IL-2 significantly decreased. No serious side effects developed occurred after influenza vaccination, and the influenza-like symptoms did not differ significantly between vaccinated versus control patients. The relapse of the disease was observed in only 10% of the patients and was more common in vaccinated than in control subjects. CONCLUSION: Split virion vaccines seem to be more effective than whole virion vaccines. Measuring the antibody responses is worthwhile in patients treated with immunosuppressants to determine the efficacy of influenza vaccination.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Biological Therapy/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Alphainfluenzavirus/immunology , Betainfluenzavirus/immunology , Interferon-gamma/blood , Interleukin-2/blood , Male , Prospective Studies , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood , Vaccination , Virion/immunology
3.
Orv Hetil ; 152(24): 951-7, 2011 Jun 12.
Article in Hungarian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21609921

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Secondary loss of response (initial good response followed by loss of response and flare up) is a frequent event occurring during biological therapy. The aim of this study was to assess loss of efficacy in patients with Crohn's disease treated with infliximab or adalimumab for a year. Secondary goals were to identify clinical or laboratory predictors of loss of response and to evaluate whether the frequency of dose escalation differs in patients receiving infliximab or adalimumab. Data were provided by a computerized database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with Crohn's disease achieved remission after induction therapy and received regular maintenance treatment. 35 of them were on infliximab, and 26 on adalimumab therapy. None of the patients treated with infliximab received previous biological therapy, while 10 of the adalimumab-treated patients were naïve to biological therapy. Authors compared the data of patients who relapsed with those who remained in remission and also the characteristics of infliximab-treated patients with adalimumab-naïve patients. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test. Kaplan Meier curve was used to show the time of loss of efficacy. RESULTS: Remission was achieved in 70.5%, and response was achieved in 29.5% of the patients after induction. Loss of response occurred in 22 of the 61 patients after a year of therapy. The proportion of remission after induction was significantly lower in patients who lost response vs. those who remained in remission. More patients with sustained remission received immunosuppressive therapy before and during the biological therapy vs. those with loss of response. Loss of response was significantly more frequent and occurred earlier in adalimumab-naive patients vs. infliximab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: The need for dose escalation should be calculated in the budget in the majority of patients, especially in adalimumab-treated patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy/methods , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Drug Tolerance , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Adalimumab , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Chi-Square Distribution , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Gastrointestinal Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Infliximab , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Remission Induction , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL