Clinical benefits of retrograde bladder filling method prior to catheter removal after TURP for BPH: A prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate possible benefits and clinical feasibility of retrograde bladder filling method prior to intra-vesical catheter removal after transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male patients undergoing TURP for BPH from January 2019 to October 2019 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either retrograde filling (RF) or spontaneous voiding (SV) methods at a single institution to determine safety and efficacy of RF (NCT04309032), with surgeons blinded to allocation. Perioperative outcomes including postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Clinician/patients' satisfaction level which was evaluated with postoperative questionnaires were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were randomized into two groups and 56 were included in final analysis (28 men in RF group, 26 in SV group). No significant differences in baseline characteristics including age, prostate volume, or perioperative uroflowmetry were observed. However, RF significantly facilitated time to void (67.0±63.2 vs. 144.0±78.7 min; p<0.001) and time to discharge (168.4±57.2 vs. 218.9±106.9 min; p=0.046). Immediate postoperative complications were comparable in both methods with no significant difference. Overall patient and medical staff satisfaction showed tolerable and similar response by either procedure. CONCLUSIONS: RF method for intra-vesical catheter removal is a safe and satisfactory method that can facilitate early voiding detection and shorten the time to discharge. Further trials are required to further validate our results.

Effect of personalized extracorporeal biofeedback device for pelvic floor muscle training on urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of a novel personalized extracorporeal biofeedback device (Anykegel) for pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on the recovery of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) through a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 84 patients who underwent RARP were randomized either to the intervention group (42) (receiving biofeedback-PFMT using a novel device in addition to verbal and written instruction) or to the control group (42). Patients were evaluated 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery. Incontinence severity was measured by the 24-hour pad test. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire were also assessed. RESULTS: The intervention group showed a significantly smaller volume of urine loss at the 1-month follow-up than the control group on a 24-hour pad test (71.0 g vs 120.8 g; P = .028). However, from the 2-month follow-up visit, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. In addition, in the 1-month follow-up data of the IPSS-total score, the intervention group demonstrated significantly favorable changes from baseline with improved scores compared to the control group (0.25 ± 9.15 vs -3.81 ± 8.98; P = .046). Regarding the IIEF-5 score changes, no significant differences were reported throughout the study periods. CONCLUSIONS: The personalized extracorporeal biofeedback device for PFMT offers a significant positive effect on the recovery of PPI after RARP, especially in the early postoperative period. Furthermore, patients can be offered more convenience through performing the regular exercise at any place with ease.

Theracurmin® efficiently inhibits the growth of human prostate and bladder cancer cells via induction of apoptotic cell death and cell cycle arrest.

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the anticancer properties of Theracurmin®, a novel form of the yellow curry pigment curcumin, as well as explore the molecular mechanisms of the potential anticancer effects of Theracurmin® on human prostate cancer and bladder cancer cells in vitro. The proliferation of cancer cells was examined by using the Cell Counting Kit-8. The clonogenic growth potential was determined by clonogenic assay. Cell cycle distribution was evaluated by flow cytometry using propidium iodide staining. Western blot analysis was applied to explore the expression patterns of molecules associated with apoptotic cell death and cell cycle checkpoint. We noted that Theracurmin® and curcumin exhibited similar anticancer effects in both androgen-dependent and -independent human prostate cancer cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. These agents reduced cell viability and clonogenic growth potential by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle disturbance in human prostate cancer cells. Theracurmin® and curcumin also exerted marked anticancer effects on human bladder cancer cells, even in cisplatin-resistant T24R2 cells, in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Moreover, Theracurmin® and curcumin treatment decreased cell viability and clonogenicity via induction of apoptotic cell death and cell cycle dysregulation in human bladder cancer cells. In conclusion, our study suggests that Theracurmin® has potential as an anticancer agent in complementary and alternative medicine for these urological cancers.

Control of infective complications of transrectal prostate biopsy.

BACKGROUND: To describe a preparatory protocol for prostate biopsy consisting of prophylaxis based on a third-generation cephalosporin and suppository-type povidone-iodine. METHODS: From January 2004 to May 2012 we reviewed infective complications in 1,684 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. All of the patients received prophylactic antibiotics through a single intravenous injection of a third-generation cephalosporin and cefixime at 100 mg PO for 5 d, with this regimen begun before biopsy, and were also given gynobetadine in a dose of 200 mg just before biopsy. Infectious complications were classified as sepsis, fever (>38°C) without sepsis, and other clinical manifestations of infection. To evaluate the bactericidal effects of gynobetadine, we counted bacterial colonies prospectively in cultures of rectal swab specimens from 150 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 46 of the patients (2.73%), including infective complications in 11 (0.65%) patients and non-infective complications in 35 (2.08%) patients. Of the patients with infective complications, two had fever without sepsis, none had clinical urinary tract infections without fever, and none had sepsis. In prospective in vitro investigations, the mean bacterial colony count before rectal preparation with an enema or rectal insertion of povidone-iodine suppository was 2.38×10(6), whereas the colony count after a povidone-iodine rectal enema and subsequent biopsy was 1.81×10(3) and the colony count after rectal preparation with povidone-iodine suppository and subsequent biopsy was 8.1×10(2) (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of cephalosporin-based prophylactic antibiotics and the simple use of suppository-type povidone-iodine provided an excellent protocol for reducing infective complications of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. The simplicity of use and cost effectiveness of gynobetadine were noteworthy.

An analysis of the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of fulguration under local anesthesia for small-sized recurrent masses: a comparative analysis to transurethral resection of bladder tumors in a matched cohort.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of fulguration compared with traditional transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (TURB) among patients who had recurrent lesions after an initial TURB due to bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the period from March 2001 to January 2012, we reviewed the records of 42 patients who underwent a fulguration procedure for a recurrent Ta small bladder mass after excluding those with ≥1-cm sized masses at recurrence and those with masses at more than three sites. The included fulguration patients were matched with 42 TURB patients who presented with similar preoperative factors. The perioperative outcomes, including complications, recurrence-free survival rate, and total medical cost during each procedure, were compared. RESULTS: The mean tumor size was similar between the two groups (0.54 cm in the fulguration group vs. 0.61 cm in the TURB group, p=0.161). During the follow-up periods, 12 patients (28.5%) in the fulguration group and 11 patients (26.2%) in the TURB group experienced tumor recurrence. The recurrence-free survival rate was similar for both groups (p=0.880). The mean total medical cost of fulguration was much cheaper compared with the TURB group (393.3 vs. 1164.6 US dollars, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fulguration under local anesthesia for a small-sized recurrent mass is safe and efficacious in properly selected patients. In addition, it also significantly reduces the medical cost and avoids unnecessary anesthesia. Although the two treatments yielded similar oncological results, this finding should be validated in a large-scale, well-designed prospective study.

Radical prostatectomy versus high dose permanent prostate brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds for patients with high risk prostate cancer: a matched cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the biochemical outcomes reported after radical prostatectomy (RP) versus high dose permanent prostate brachytherapy (HDPPB) using iodine-125 seeds in the treatment of matched high risk prostate cancer (HiPCa). METHODS: In this retrospective review, 55 HiPCa patients treated between March 2006 and August 2011, who underwent HDPPB using iodine-125 seeds combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), were compared with 55 HiPCa patients who underwent RP. Patients were matched for age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and Gleason scores. The biochemical outcomes after HDPPB and RP were compared via Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of the 110 patients analyzed, the mean ages, PSA, and Gleason biopsy scores were similar between the two cohorts. Among patients who underwent HDPPB, 20 patients (36.4%) had received adjuvant EBRT. Of this subsample, most patients (98.2%) had received adjuvant ADT for 3 months. Among patients with RP, 20 patients (36.4%) had received adjuvant EBRT, whereas 28 patients had received adjuvant ADT. The mean implanted seed numbers were 92.8, the mean D90 was 218.7 Gy, and the mean V100 was 96.1% after HDPPB. With regard to oncological outcomes, biochemical disease-free survival rates were similar between the two cohorts (82.6 vs. 81.1%, p = 0.982). Urethrorectal fistula developed in one patient with HDPPB. CONCLUSION: RP and HDPPB, using iodine-125 seeds with combined treatment modalities, exhibited similar biochemical recurrence-free survival rates among HiPCa patients. Further prospective studies with greater sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these results.

Novel surgical technique for obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia: finger-assisted, single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To report our experience with finger-assisted, single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate (F-STEP) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to April 2010, perioperative data on the 32 patients in the F-STEP group were collected and compared with the 67 patients in the TURP group. Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) grade 3 was included in the F-STEP group. In the F-STEP group, a homemade, single-port device using an Alexis wound retractor was introduced transvesically through a small incision. After establishing a pneumovesicum, the adenoma was enucleated laparoscopically with finger dissection. A conventional method was performed in the TURP group. RESULTS: There was no significant preoperative difference in age, prostate size, maximum uroflow rate (Qmax), dysuria, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and quality of life score (QoLs) between the two groups. The postoperative IPSS (4.00 vs 8.77, P = 0.03), Qmax (36.19 vs 22.03 mL/min, P = 0.04), dysuria (visual analogue score 1.73 vs 3.14, P = 0.04), and IPSS recovery period (5.54 vs 10.88 weeks, P = 0.01) were significantly improved in the F-STEP group compared with the TURP group. The mean operative time (109.42 vs 68.03 min, P = 0.02) and catheterization time (5.31 vs 2.09 days, P = 0.03) were significantly longer. Weight of the extracted specimen (48.35 vs 29.85 gm, P = 0.03) were greater in the F-STEP than in the TURP group. In the F-STEP group, no urethral stricture developed. CONCLUSIONS: F-STEP is an effective technique modification without urethral complications that is indicated for moderate-to-large prostates with intraveiscal protruding adenoma.