TsMS combined with EA promotes functional recovery and axonal regeneration via mediating the miR-539-5p/Sema3A/PlexinA1 signalling axis in sciatic nerve-injured rats.

Enhancing axonal regeneration is one of the most important processes in treating nerve injuries. Both magnetic and electrical stimulation have the effect of promoting nerve axon regeneration. But few study has investigated the effects of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (TsMS) combined with electroacupuncture (EA) on nerve regeneration in rats with sciatic nerve injury. In this study, we compared the improvement of neurological function in rats with sciatic nerve crush injuries after 4 weeks of different interventions (EA, TsMS, or TsMS combined with EA). We further explored the morphological and molecular biological alterations following sciatic nerve injury by HE, Masson, RT-PCR, western blotting, immunofluorescence staining and small RNA transcriptome sequencing. The results showed that TsMS combined with EA treatment significantly promoted axonal regeneration, increased the survival rate of neurons, and suppressed denervation atrophy of the gastrocnemius muscle. Subsequent experiments suggested that the combination treatment may play an active role by mediating the miR-539-5p/Sema3A/PlexinA1 signaling axis.

Efficacy and Safety of Panax notoginseng Saponin Therapy for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Meta-Analysis, and Mini Review of Potential Mechanisms of Action.

UNLABELLED: Intracranial/intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a leading cause of death and disability in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke. No proven drug is available for ICH. Panax notoginseng (total saponin extraction, PNS) is one of the most valuable herb medicines for stroke and cerebralvascular disorders in China. We searched for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) involving PNS injection to treat cerebral hemorrhage for meta-analysis from various databases including the Chinese Stroke Trials Register, the trials register of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Chinese BioMedical disk, and China Doctorate/Master Dissertations Databases. The quality of the eligible trials was assessed by Jadad's scale. Twenty (20) of the 24 identified randomized controlled trials matched the inclusive criteria including 984 ICH patients with PNS injection and 907 ICH patients with current treatment (CT). Compared to the CT groups, PNS-treated patients showed better outcomes in the effectiveness rate (ER), neurological deficit score, intracranial hematoma volume, intracerebral edema volume, Barthel index, the number of patients died, and incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: PNS injection is superior to CT for acute ICH. A review of the literature shows that PNS may exert multiple protective mechanisms against ICH-induced brain damage including hemostasis, anti-coagulation, anti-thromboembolism, cerebral vasodilation, invigorated blood dynamics, anti-inflammation, antioxidation, and anti-hyperglycemic effects. Since vitamin C and other brain cell activators (BCA) that are not considered common practice were also used as parts of the CT in several trials, potential PNS and BCA interactions could exist that may have made the effect of PNS therapy less or more impressive than by PNS therapy alone. Future PNS trials with and without the inclusion of such controversial BCAs as part of the CT could clarify the situation. As PNS has a long clinical track record in Asia, it could potentially become a therapy option to treat ICH in the US and Europe. Further clinical trials with better experimental design could determine the long-term effects of PNS treatment for TBI and stroke.