Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 34(2): 137-147, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36541106

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of diode laser photobiomodulation (PBM) on post-surgical healing, inflammation and implant stability. METHODS: Forty dental implants were inserted into 13 patients. The implants were randomly divided into two groups. The test group (PBM+) underwent two sessions of PBM (combined diode laser of 630 and 808 nm), the first of which after surgery, and the second, 7 days after the surgical procedure. The control group (PBM-) received simulated laser treatment. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was determined immediately after the surgical procedure, and 7 days, 4 and 8 weeks later. Post-surgical inflammation was assessed following the criteria described by Bloemen and Cols. Healing was calculated using the healing index (HI). RESULTS: No differences were found in terms of the mean values of implant stability between the test and control groups over time. Only two of the implants (18.2%) from the PBM- group were classified with the maximum healing index (HI = 5), whereas in the PBM+ group, nine implants (45%) were classified with the aforementioned index (P < 0.0001). Using the logistic regression, it was determined that the non-application of the laser in the PBM- group caused an OR of 4.333 times of presenting inflammation (IC95% 1.150-16.323; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The application of 808 nm infra-red laser for bone tissue, and 630 nm for mucosal tissue in two sessions is considered to be an effective way of reducing inflammation and improving early healing. More studies are needed to confirm these results.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Double-Blind Method , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Lasers, Semiconductor , Bone and Bones
2.
Odontology ; 108(3): 470-478, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31664632

ABSTRACT

Traumatic oral ulceration (TOU) is one of the most common side effects of orthodontic treatments. The objective of this trial is to compare the clinical efficacy of an 80% Aloe Vera gel, prepared using a master formula, versus a commercial 0.12% Chlorhexidine (CHX) gel for TOU prevention in participants wearing fixed orthodontic appliances. This report represents a single-centre, university-based, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel arms. Patients aged 12 years or older, in the permanent dentition, and about to start fixed orthodontic treatment in this university setting were randomly allocated to use either Aloe Vera or CHX gel, following the cementation procedure. Pre-treatment and 1 month after the cementation clinical assessment and digital photographic images were taken of the teeth and assessed by 2 clinical assessors for the presence or absence of TOUs. A total of 140 were randomized and completed the trial. The overall prevalence of TOUs was 43.6%. Overall 5.7% of patients treated with Aloe Vera gel showed did not suffer from TOUs, whereas in the CHX arm, a total of 57 (81.4%) were affected by this outcome reaching a significant result (p < 0.001). In terms of relative risk (RRs) and confidence intervals (CIs), Aloe Vera provided better results than CHX with an RR of 0.07 (95%CI 0.03-0.16; p < 0.001), and with a patients' number needed to treat of 1.3 (95%CI 1.16-1.54). There were no adverse effects. These results suggest that Aloe Vera gel administration in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances could be important for effective prevention of TOU.


Subject(s)
Aloe , Chlorhexidine , Child , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed , Plant Preparations , Treatment Outcome , Ulcer
3.
Med Hypotheses ; 116: 79-83, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29857915

ABSTRACT

Vitamin D is an important nutrient for bone health and skeleton growth. Few foods are natural sources of this secosteroid; this is the reason why the consumption of vitamin D as a dietary supplement is becoming common in developed countries. For many years vitamin D has been considered crucial in the treatment and prevention of the Global Burden of Disease and in a reduction in mortality among elder people. Many health care providers prescribe these supplements in the management of osteoporosis and metabolic bone diseases; specifically in the primary prevention of fractures. Recently medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has been reported as severe late sequelae of antiresorptive therapies (i.e., bisphosphonates and some monoclonal antibodies). Although MRONJ-related pathophysiology is not fully understood, there are three fundamental theories to explain it: (1) the inhibition of osteoclasts, (2) the inhibition of angiogenesis and (3) the processes of inflammation-infection. Recent advances in Vitamin D research have shown that this secosteroid can play a potential pivotal role in many of the different etiological pathways of MRONJ. Furthermore, there are a large number of co-morbidities between the deficit of this vitamin and other MRONJ concomitant outcomes. Our hypothesis argues that the low-risk and low-cost vitamin D dietary supplementation may prove to be suitable for use as a practical MRONJ prevention strategy. The described framework gives more insight into the study of disease mechanisms, search of potential biomarkers, and therapeutic targets in MRONJ.


Subject(s)
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy , Dietary Supplements , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone and Bones/metabolism , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Epigenesis, Genetic , Humans , Inflammation , Models, Theoretical , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL