Structural characterization of the major extrapallial fluid protein of the mollusc Mytilus edulis: implications for function.

The major protein component of the extrapallial fluid of the mollusc Mytilus edulis has been previously isolated and partially characterized. It was postulated to play a role in shell mineralization because of its intriguing property of Ca(2+)-binding-induced self-assembling. However, it also binds other divalent ions, including Cd(2+), Cu(2+), Mn(2+), and Mg(2+). Herein is the initial report on the characterization of the primary structure of the extrapallial (EP) protein by RT-PCR and cDNA sequencing methods and by de novo peptide sequencing with mass spectrometry. The EP protein is comprised of 213 amino acids postcleavage of a signal peptide of 23 amino acids. The protein is rich in His, Glu, and Asp residues. The site of N-glycosylation, "NHTE", at amino acid positions 54-57 and the intramolecular disulfide bond between Cys 139 and Cys 171 of the protein have been characterized also. Sequence comparisons reveal that the EP protein possesses little homology to any presently known matrix proteins previously isolated from mollusc shells but rather it highly resembles a heavy metal binding protein and a histidine-rich glycoprotein, both from the hemolymph of M. edulis. The predicted domain profile and amino acid composition suggest that its N-terminus may be involved in calcium binding. The abundance of histidine residues of the protein may account for its heavy metal binding properties. Thus, the EP protein perhaps has multiple functions, serving as a Ca(2+)-transport protein, a shell matrix protein, and a heavy metal detoxification protein.

Enamel matrix protein interactions.

UNLABELLED: The recognized structural proteins of the enamel matrix are amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. While a large volume of data exists showing that amelogenin self-assembles into multimeric units referred to as nanospheres, other reports of enamel matrix protein-protein interactions are scant. We believe that each of these enamel matrix proteins must interact with other organic components of ameloblasts and the enamel matrix. Likely protein partners would include integral membrane proteins and additional secreted proteins. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to identify and catalog additional proteins that play a significant role in enamel formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the yeast two-hybrid assay to identify protein partners for amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. Once identified, RT-PCR was used to assess gene transcription of these newly identified and potential "enamel" proteins in ameloblast-like LS8 cells. RESULTS: In the context of this yeast assay, we identified a number of secreted proteins and integral membrane proteins that interact with amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin. Additionally, proteins whose functions range from the inhibition of soft tissue mineralization, calcium ion transport, and phosphorylation events have been identified as protein partners to these enamel matrix proteins. For each protein identified using this screening strategy, future studies are planned to confirm this physiological relationship to biomineralization in vivo. CONCLUSION: Identifying integral membrane proteins of the secretory surface of ameloblast cells (Tomes' processes) and additional enamel matrix proteins, based on their abilities to interact with the most abundant enamel matrix proteins, will better define the molecular mechanisms of enamel formation at its most rudimentary level.