HeART of Stroke: randomised controlled, parallel-arm, feasibility study of a community-based arts and health intervention plus usual care compared with usual care to increase psychological well-being in people following a stroke.

INTRODUCTION: People often experience distress following stroke due to fundamental challenges to their identity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate (1) the acceptability of 'HeART of Stroke' (HoS), a community-based arts and health group intervention, to increase psychological well-being; and (2) the feasibility of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: Two-centre, 24-month, parallel-arm RCT with qualitative and economic components. Randomisation was stratified by centre and stroke severity. Participant blinding was not possible. Outcome assessment blinding was attempted. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults ≤2 years poststroke recruited via hospital clinical teams/databases or community stroke/rehabilitation teams. INTERVENTIONS: Artist-facilitated arts and health group intervention (HoS) (ten 2-hour sessions over 14 weeks) plus usual care (UC) versus UC. OUTCOMES: The outcomes were self-reported measures of well-being, mood, capability, health-related quality of life, self-esteem and self-concept (baseline and 5 months postrandomisation). Key feasibility parameters were gathered, data collection methods were piloted, and participant interviews (n=24) explored the acceptability of the intervention and study processes. RESULTS: Despite a low recruitment rate (14%; 95% CI 11% to 18%), 88% of the recruitment target was met, with 29 participants randomised to HoS and 27 to UC (57% male; mean (SD) age=70 (12.1) years; time since stroke=9 (6.1) months). Follow-up data were available for 47 of 56 (84%; 95% CI 72% to 91%). Completion rates for a study-specific resource use questionnaire were 79% and 68% (National Health Service and societal perspectives). Five people declined HoS postrandomisation; of the remaining 24 who attended, 83% attended ≥6 sessions. Preliminary effect sizes for candidate primary outcomes were in the direction of benefit for the HoS arm. Participants found study processes acceptable. The intervention cost an estimated £456 per person and was well-received (no intervention-related serious adverse events were reported). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this first community-based study of an arts and health intervention for people poststroke suggest a definitive RCT is feasible. Recruitment methods will be revised. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN99728983.

Manual stimulation of facial muscles improves functional recovery after hypoglossal-facial anastomosis and interpositional nerve grafting of the facial nerve in adult rats.

The facial nerve in humans is often prone to injuries requiring surgical intervention. In the best case, nerve reconstruction is achieved by a facial-facial anastomosis (FFA), i.e. suture of the proximal and distal stumps of the severed facial nerve. Although a method of choice, FFA rarely leads to a satisfactory functional recovery. We have recently devised and validated, in an established experimental paradigm in rats, a novel strategy to improve the outcome of FFA by daily manual stimulation (MS) of facial muscles. This treatment results in full recovery of facial movements (whisking) and is achieved by reducing the proportion of functionally detrimental poly-innervated motor end-plates. Here we asked whether MS could also be beneficial after two other commonly used surgical methods of clinical facial nerve reconstruction namely hypoglossal-facial anastomosis (HFA) and interpositional nerve grafting (IPNG) which, however, seem to have a poorer outcome compared to FFA. Compared to FFA, daily MS for 2 months after HFA and IPGN did not completely restore function but, nevertheless, significantly improved the amplitude of whisker movements by 50% compared with untreated animals. Functional improvement was associated with a reduction in the proportion of polyinnervated end-plates. MS did not reduce the extent of axonal branching at the lesion site nor the subsequent misdirected axonal regrowth to inappropriate targets. Our data show that a simple approach leading to improved quality of muscle fiber reinnervation is functionally beneficial after different types of clinically relevant surgical interventions.