Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
2.
Clin Biochem ; 95: 49-53, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34077758

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The management of affected results in haemolysed samples (HS) is debated. In an infant-maternity setting, for reporting interfered test results, we provided the result itself, the degree of haemolysis (as free haemoglobin concentration), and a warning recommending sample recollection. We investigated the impact of this approach on sample quality and clinicians' decision-making. METHODS: Free haemoglobin was measured on Beckman Coulter AU680 as haemolytic index. We estimated the total HS number, the clinical wards more affected by HS, the most interfered analytes, and the retesting rate of interfered tests, by comparing data from Apr-Dec 2017, the period just after the introduction of the new policy, vs. Apr-Dec 2018. RESULTS: One year after the new report introduction, a significant HS decrease (5.8% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001) was detected, together with a reduction of the frequency by which haemolysis affected results. The most affected wards, i.e., Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units, showed an improvement in sample quality (HS rate, 30.6% to 16.1%, P < 0.001, and 25.2% to 20.9%, P = 0.048, respectively). We noted a significant decrease in retesting after an alerted result for aspartate aminotransferase, magnesium, potassium, conjugated bilirubin, and lactate dehydrogenase. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach led to a HS decrease, suggesting that the provided report could be a driving force for improvement of phlebotomy quality, also helping clinicians in deciding if retesting is essential or not.


Subject(s)
Blood Chemical Analysis/standards , Blood Specimen Collection/standards , Chemistry, Clinical/methods , Chemistry, Clinical/standards , Hemolysis , Hospitals, Maternity , Specimen Handling/standards , Blood Specimen Collection/statistics & numerical data , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Obstetrics , Patients' Rooms , Specimen Handling/statistics & numerical data
3.
Nutrients ; 12(8)2020 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32823606

ABSTRACT

Maternal dietary intake during pregnancy needs to meet increased nutritional demands to maintain metabolism and to support fetal development. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is essential for fetal neuro-/visual development and in immunomodulation, accumulating rapidly within the developing brain and central nervous system. Levels available to the fetus are governed by the maternal diet. In this multicenter, parallel, randomized controlled trial, we evaluated once-daily supplementation with multiple micronutrients and DHA (i.e., multiple micronutrient supplementation, MMS) on maternal biomarkers and infant anthropometric parameters during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy compared with no supplementation. Primary efficacy endpoint: change in maternal red blood cell (RBC) DHA (wt% total fatty acids) during the study. Secondary variables: other biomarkers of fatty acid and oxidative status, vitamin D, and infant anthropometric parameters at delivery. Supplementation significantly increased RBC DHA levels, the omega-3 index, and vitamin D levels. Subscapular skinfold thickness was significantly greater with MMS in infants. Safety outcomes were comparable between groups. This first randomized controlled trial of supplementation with multiple micronutrients and DHA in pregnant women indicated that MMS significantly improved maternal DHA and vitamin D status in an industrialized setting-an important finding considering the essential roles of DHA and vitamin D.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Docosahexaenoic Acids/administration & dosage , Fetal Development/drug effects , Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Micronutrients/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Fetal Blood/metabolism , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Nutritional Status , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimesters/blood , Prenatal Care/methods , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin D/blood , Young Adult
5.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 55(9): 1262-1275, 2017 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27988504

ABSTRACT

Several authors have recently claimed an excess in serum folate test ordering, suggesting phasing out it from clinical use. According to studies performed in countries undergoing folic acid fortification policies, it is indeed no more cost-effective to test folate in the face of deficiency prevalence <1%. In this paper, we sought to evaluate request appropriateness, analytical issues, and cost-effectiveness of serum folate determination for clinical purposes in the European context, considering if evidence retrieved in fortified countries may be generalized. Studies performed in non-fortified countries have generally reported a suboptimal folate intake and suggest a remarkable prevalence of folate deficiency. Our internal data suggest that ~20%-25% of the subjects undergoing serum folate test are at risk for deficiency. However, a reliable evaluation of the risk for deficiency implies the knowledge of all issues related to the total testing process of folate measurement as well as the identification of the appropriate population in which to perform the test. The cost-effectiveness of the test is maximized when the request is oriented to subjects suggestive/at risk for deficiency, becoming low if the test is used as a screening tool or for monitoring of vitamin intake/supplementation. Because the individual folate status has a key role in ensuring normal development, physiologic growth, and maintenance of optimal health, the evaluation of its serum levels has to be retained in the clinical use in non-fortified countries, boosting for more appropriate request, and evidence from countries following fortification policies should be cautionary interpreted.


Subject(s)
Blood Chemical Analysis , Folic Acid/blood , Europe , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Folic Acid Deficiency/blood , Humans
7.
Clin Chim Acta ; 413(15-16): 1184-9, 2012 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22546612

ABSTRACT

Despite the growing interest in hepcidin and other relatively new biomarkers, guidelines and clinical pathways continue to recommend traditional markers, such as serum transferrin (Tf) and ferritin, as laboratory tests for the diagnostic evaluation of iron-related disorders. In this study, we aimed to critically evaluate the diagnostic role of Tf relying on the highest level of available evidence by a comprehensive literature search. The role of Tf in iron deficiency (ID) and iron overload (IO) syndrome as well as a risk marker was evaluated. The low accuracy of Tf and Tf saturation (TS) in the diagnosis and management of ID conditions does not permit definitively recommending their use, even if recently published guidelines still consider the TS investigation as a complementary test for ferritin. If a tissue IO is suspected, TS is often used, even if it may not be the best test for detecting this condition. Nevertheless, clinical guidelines strongly recommend the use of TS as a first-level test for performing genetic diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis. Recently reported data indicating elevated TS as a risk factor for diabetes mellitus, cancer, and total mortality, may provide useful additions to the debate over whether or not to screen for IO using TS.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Transferrin/analysis , Transferrin/physiology , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/blood , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/diagnosis , Deficiency Diseases/blood , Deficiency Diseases/diagnosis , Hemochromatosis/diagnosis , Hemochromatosis/genetics , Homeostasis , Humans , Iron/metabolism , Iron Deficiencies , Iron Overload/blood , Iron Overload/diagnosis , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL