Parenteral vs Oral Vitamin B12 in Children With Nutritional Macrocytic Anemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is limited literature in children on efficacy of different routes of vitamin B12 administration for vitamin B12 deficiency macrocytic-megaloblastic anemia. OBJECTIVE: To compare parenteral with oral vitamin B12 therapy in children with macrocytic-megaloblastic anemia. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANT: 80 children aged 2 month-18 year with clinical and laboratory features of nutritional macrocytic anemia. INTERVENTION: All children received an initial single parenteral dose of 1000 µg vitamin B12 followed by randomization to either parenteral or oral vitamin B12 for subsequent doses. Group A was given 1000 µg intramuscular (IM) vitamin B12 (3 doses on alternate days for those aged <10 year, five doses for age >10 year), followed by monthly 1000 µg IM for the subsequent two doses. Group B was given daily oral vitamin B12 1500 µg (500 µg in <2 years age) for three months. Folic acid and iron supple-mentation, and relevant dietary advice were given to both groups in a similar fashion. OUTCOME: Improvement in serum vitamin B12 levels and total hemoglobin was compared three months post-treatment. RESULT: The median(IQR) increase in serum vitamin B12 level was significantly higher in group A [600 (389,775) vs 399 (313, 606) pg/mL; P= 0.016]. The median (IQR) rise of hemoglobin was also more in group A [2.7 (0.4,4.6) vs 0.5 (-0.1,1.2) g/dL; P=0.001]. CONCLUSION: Increase in serum vitamin B12 levels and hemoglobin was better in children with nutritional macrocytic anemia receiving parenteral as compared to oral vitamin B12.

Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among older adults in Jodhpur and stakeholders perspective on responsive health system.

BACKGROUND: Ageing is an inescapable reality of human existence. The elderly population of India is steadily increasing with growing mental health needs which pose many challenges for the health care system. The aim of this study is to assess anxiety, depression, and cognitive disorders among urban and rural elderly and to explore the availability of social support mechanisms and a responsive health system for elderly. METHODS: This study is a mixed-method approach. For a quantitative study, a community-based cross-sectional survey is conducted in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. A total of 330 elderly persons aged 60 years and above are randomly screened for depression (GDS), anxiety (GAD), and cognitive impairment (HMSE). Further for a qualitative study, in-depth interviews are conducted with 7 key informants including policy and program managers, service providers, and facilitators from the state. For quantitative data analysis, Excel and SPSS are used and for Qualitative data analysis, Thematic Framework Approach is used. RESULTS: The mean age of the respondents is 67.9 ± 7.8. The prevalence of severe depression is 17%, severe anxiety is 10.3%, and cognitive impairment is 51.2%. The prevalence of all the three is more in rural elderly as compared to urban elderly as well as more in female individuals as compared to males. Qualitative analysis revealed that there are challenges in early identification of mental disorders at both the levels: service providers and elderly. Psychological and financial issues are also seen in elderly who are not supported by their children. There are cases of fear for elder abuse and influence of western culture in the society. CONCLUSION: There is a sizeable prevalence of psychological issues in elderly population. Therefore, there is a need to adopt holistic and integrated psychogeriatric services for the improvement of quality of life in elderly.