Real-World Data on Newly Diagnosed BRCA-Mutated High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: The French National Multicenter ESME Database.

BACKGROUND: In spite of the frequency and clinical impact of BRCA1/2 alterations in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (HGEOC), real-world information based on robust data warehouse has been scarce to date. METHODS: Consecutive patients with BRCA-mutated HGEOC treated between 2011 and 2016 within French comprehensive cancer centers from the Unicancer network were extracted from the ESME database. The main objective of the study was the assessment of clinicopathological and treatments parameters. RESULTS: Out of the 8021 patients included in the ESME database, 266 patients matching the selection criteria were included. BRCA1 mutation was found in 191 (71.8%) patients, while 75 (28.2%) had a BRCA2 mutation only; 95.5% of patients received a cytoreductive surgery. All patients received a taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy (median = six cycles). Complete and partial response were obtained in 53.3% and 20.4% of the cases, respectively. Maintenance therapy was administered in 55.3% of the cases, bevacizumab being the most common agent. After a median follow up of 51.7 months, a median progression-free survival of 28.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI) [26.5; 32.7]) and an estimated 5-year median overall survival of 69.2% (95% CI [61.6; 70.3]) were reported. Notably, BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated cases exhibited a trend towards different median progression-free survivals, with 28.0 (95% CI [24.4; 32.3]) and 33.3 months (95% CI [26.7; 46.1]), respectively (p-value = 0.053). Furthermore, five-year OS for BRCA1-mutated patients was 64.5% (95% CI [59.7; 69.2]), while it was 82.5% (95% CI [76.6; 88.5]) for BRCA2-mutated ones (p-value = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the largest French multicenter cohort of BRCA-mutated HGEOCs based on robust data from the ESME, exhibiting relevant real-world data regarding this specific population.

[Management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Short text drafted from the French joint recommendations of FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY and endorsed by INCa]. / Texte court rédigé à partir de la recommandation nationale de bonnes pratiques cliniques « Conduites à tenir initiales devant des patientes atteintes d'un cancer épithélial de l'ovaire ¼ élaborée par FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY et labélisée par l'INCa ¼.

Faced to an undetermined ovarian mass on ultrasound, an MRI is recommended and the ROMA score (combining CA125 and HE4) can be proposed (grade A). In case of suspected early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, omentectomy (at least infracolonic), appendectomy, multiple peritoneal biopsies, peritoneal cytology (grade C) and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy are recommended (grade B) for all histological types, except for the expansive mucinous subtype where lymphadenectomy may be omitted (grade C). Minimally invasive surgery is recommended for early stage ovarian cancer, if there is no risk of tumor rupture (grade B). Adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel is recommended for all high-grade ovarian or Fallopian tube cancers, stage FIGO I-IIA (grade A). In case of ovarian, Fallopian tube or primitive peritoneal cancer of FIGO III-IV stages, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT scan with injection (grade B) is recommended. Laparoscopic exploration for multiple biopsies (grade A) and to evaluate carcinomatosis score (at least using the Fagotti score) (grade C) are recommended to estimate the possibility of a complete surgery (i.e. no macroscopic residue). Complete medial laparotomy surgery is recommended for advanced cancers (grade B). It is recommended in advanced cancers to perform para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in case of clinical or radiological suspicion of metastatic lymph node (grade B). In the absence of clinical or radiological lymphadenopathy and in case of complete peritoneal surgery during an initial surgery for advanced cancer, it is possible not to perform a lymphadenectomy because it does not modify the medical treatment and the overall survival (grade B). Primary surgery is recommended when no tumor residue is possible (grade B). After a complete first surgery, it is recommended to deliver 6 cycles of intravenous (grade A) or to propose intraperitoneal (grade B) chemotherapy, to be discussed with patient, according to the benefit/risk ratio. After a complete interval surgery for a FIGO III stage, the hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed in the same conditions of the OV-HIPEC trial (grade B). In case of tumor residue after surgery or FIGO stage IV, chemotherapy associated with bevacizumab is recommended (grade A).

The off-label use of targeted therapies in sarcomas: the OUTC'S program.

BACKGROUND: Few targeted therapies (TTs) are registered for sarcoma treatment despite numerous phase II studies and yet there are potential treatment options for patients after standard treatment escape. The French Sarcoma Group - Bone Tumor Study Group (GSF-GETO) created a national registry to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with off-label TTs. METHODS: Every consecutive sarcoma-patient receiving an off-label TT outside a clinical trial was included. The objective was to describe this patient efficacy and safety data in routine practice. RESULTS: From October 2008 to October 2011, 249 patients in 24 centers received 278 treatment lines with TTs. Twenty-five histological subtypes were included: most frequent were leiomyosarcoma (n=48, receiving sorafenib in 63%, and sunitinib in 27%), GIST (n=39, receiving sorafenib in 79%), and angiosarcoma (n=18, receiving sorafenib in 78%). The overall response rate to TTs was 15% (95% CI [10,6-20,2]), the disease control rate at 2 months was 59%. The median progression-free survival was 4,1 months (IC 95% [3,2-4,8]). Three complete responses were observed. No toxic death occurred, grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported in 74 (27%) and 14 patients (5%) respectively. CONCLUSION: Off-label TTs can be used for sarcoma patients in routine practice with an acceptable toxicity profile and efficacy similar to that reported in non-randomized clinical trials.

Results of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian granulosa cell tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and morbidity of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for relapsed ovarian granulosa cell tumors (OGCT). STUDY DESIGN: Between 2007 and 2009, patients with relapsed OGCT who had been treated with HIPEC after CRS in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 7 patients who had undergone CRS plus HIPEC. Macroscopically complete cytoreduction had been performed in all patients. The location of the recurrence was exclusively the pelvis in 2 cases and both the pelvis and abdomen in 5 cases. We had administered an intraperitoneal perfusion of oxaliplatin (460 mg/m(2)) or oxaliplatin (360 mg/m(2)) plus irinotecan (360 mg/m(2)) heated up to 41-43°C for 30 min. No post-operative mortality nor any grade IV morbidity (according to the Clavien and Dindo classification) had occurred. One lymphocyst (grade III) had appeared which had twice required percutaneous drainage. Six patients had experienced extra-abdominal complications (all grade II). Median follow-up after CRS plus HIPEC was 32 months (range, 25-56). Among the 7 patients, 2 are disease free, 3 had relapsed with peritoneal carcinomatosis and 2 had relapsed with liver metastases. CONCLUSIONS: HIPEC (using oxaliplatin or oxaliplatin plus irinotecan) should not be recommended to treat relapsed OGCT.

Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study conducted in three French comprehensive cancer centers was to evaluate the therapeutic impact on survival of laparoscopic para-aortic (PA) staging surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) before chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of 237 patients treated from 2004 to 2011 for LACC with negative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the PA area and undergoing laparoscopic PA lymphadenectomy. Radiation fields were extended to the PA area when PA nodes were involved. Chemoradiotherapy modalities were homogeneous across institutions. Patients with a poor prognosis histologic subtype or peritoneal carcinosis were excluded. RESULTS: Patients had clinical International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2 (n = 79), IIA (n = 10), IIB (n = 121), III (n = 22), or IVA (n = 5). One hundred ninety-nine patients had squamous carcinoma, and 38 had adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous lesions. Twenty-nine patients (12%) had nodal involvement (false-negative PET-computed tomography [CT] results)-16 with a PA nodal metastasis measuring more than 5 mm and 13 with a nodal metastasis measuring ≤ 5 mm. Event-free survival rates at 3 years in patients without PA involvement or with PA metastasis measuring ≤ or more than 5 mm were 74% (SE, 4%), 69% (SE, 21%), and 17% (SE, 14%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients reported undergoing such a strategy. We obtained the same survival rate for patients with PA nodal metastasis ≤ 5 mm and patients without PA lymph node involvement, suggesting that this strategy is highly efficient in such patients. Conversely, the survival of patients with PA nodal involvement greater than 5 mm remained poor, despite the absence of extrapelvic disease on PET-CT imaging in this subgroup.

Safety of simple cystectomy in patients with unilateral mucinous borderline tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To report on ovarian carcinoma development after cystectomy for a borderline mucinous ovarian tumor. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: A French comprehensive cancer center. PATIENT(S): One patient who developed recurrence in the form of an invasive ovarian carcinoma after simple cystectomy for a borderline mucinous ovarian tumor. INTERVENTION(S): Simple cystectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical outcome. RESULT(S): A 22-year-old nulliparous patient underwent laparoscopic cystectomy. Histological examination revealed a borderline mucinous ovarian tumor. No additional treatment was prescribed. Two years later, the patient relapsed with a malignant mucinous ovarian carcinoma. She underwent surgical resection and staging, including hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and platinum-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION(S): Recurrence in the form of invasive ovarian carcinoma may occur in the same ovary after cystectomy in cases of borderline mucinous ovarian tumor. An approach combining systematic unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and strict monitoring is preferable to simple cystectomy. Such treatment enables preservation of reproductive potential and reduces the risk of developing invasive carcinoma.