Bariatric surgery and skeletal health: A narrative review and position statement for management by the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS).

CONTEXT: Numerous studies have demonstrated detrimental skeletal consequences following bariatric surgery. METHODS: A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) performed an updated review of existing literature on changes of bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk following bariatric surgery and provided advice on management based on expert opinion. LITERATURE REVIEW: Based on observational studies, bariatric surgery is associated with a 21-44% higher risk of all fractures. Fracture risk is time-dependent and increases approximately 3 years after bariatric surgery. The bariatric procedures that have a malabsorptive component (including Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD)) have clearly been associated with the highest risk of fracture. The extent of high-turnover bone loss suggests a severe skeletal insult. This is associated with diminished bone strength and compromised microarchitecture. RYGB was the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide until very recently, when sleeve gastrectomy (SG) became more prominent. There is growing evidence that RYGB is associated with greater reduction in BMD, greater increase in BTMs, and higher risk of fractures compared with SG but RCTs on optimal management are still lacking. EXPERT OPINION: In all patients, it is mandatory to treat vitamin D deficiency, to achieve adequate daily calcium and protein intake and to promote physical activity before and following bariatric surgery. In post-menopausal women and men older than 50 years, osteoporosis treatment would be reasonable in the presence of any of the following criteria: i) history of recent fragility fracture after 40 years of age, ii) BMD T-score ≤ -2 at hip or spine, iii) FRAX score with femoral neck BMD exceeding 20% for the 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability or exceeding 3% for hip fracture. Zoledronate as first choice should be preferred due to intolerance of oral formulations and malabsorption. Zoledronate should be used with caution due to hypocemia risk. It is recommended to ensure adequate 25-OH vitamin D level and calcium supplementation before administering zoledronate. CONCLUSIONS: The bariatric procedures that have a malabsorptive component have been associated with the highest turnover bone loss and risk of fracture. There is a knowledge gap on osteoporosis treatment in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. More research is necessary to direct and support guidelines.

Underdiagnosis and undertreatment of osteoporotic patients admitted in internal medicine wards in Italy between 2010 and 2016 (the REPOSI Register).

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of osteoporotic patients admitted to internal medicine and geriatric wards compared with non-osteoporotic patients (REPOSI registry). METHODS: We studied 4714 patients hospitalized between 2010 and 2016. We reported age, sex, educational level, living status, comorbidities and drugs taken, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), Barthel Index, Short-Blessed Test, 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale, serum hemoglobin, creatinine, and clinical outcomes. Osteoporosis was defined based on the diagnoses recorded at admission, according to the following ICD9: 733, 805-813, 820-823. RESULTS: Twelve percent of the patients had a preadmission diagnosis of osteoporosis. Only 20% of these had been prescribed oral bisphosphonates; 34% were taking vitamin D supplements. Osteoporotic patients were significantly older, with lower BMI, higher CIRS, and taking more drugs. They were significantly more depressed, less independent, with a higher severity of cognitive impairment compared with non-osteoporotic patients. At discharge, the number of patients receiving treatment for osteoporosis did not change. Length of stay and inhospital mortality did not differ between groups. Osteoporotic patients were more frequently nonhome discharged compared with those without osteoporosis (14.8 vs. 7.9%, p = 0.0007), mostly discharged to physical therapy or rehabilitation (8.8 vs. 2.5% of patients, p < 0.0001). Among osteoporotic patients deceased 3 months after discharge, the number of those treated with vitamin D, with or without calcium supplements, was significantly lower compared with survivors (12 vs. 32%, p = 0.0168). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of osteoporosis is poorly considered both during hospital stay and at discharge; osteoporotic patients are frailer compared to non-osteoporotic patients.

Diagnosis and management of hypocalcemia.

The aim of this clinical narrative review is to summarize and critically appraise the literature on the differential diagnosis of hypocalcemia and to provide its correct management. Calcium is essential for muscle contraction and neurotransmitter release, but clinical manifestations of hypocalcaemia (serum calcium level <8 mg/dl; 2.12 mmol/L) may involve almost any organ and system and may range from asymptomatic to life-threating conditions. Disorders causing hypocalcemia can be divided into parathyroid hormone (PTH) and non-PTH mediated. The most frequent cause of hypocalcemia is postsurgical hypoparathyroidism, while a more comprehensive search for other causes is needed for appropriate treatment in the non PTH-mediated forms. Intravenous calcium infusion is essential to raise calcium levels and resolve or minimize symptoms in the setting of acute hypocalcemia. Oral calcium and/or vitamin D supplementation is the most frequently used as treatment of chronic hypocalcemia. In hypoparathyroidism, providing the missing hormone with the use of the recombinant human (rh) PTH(1-84) has been recently approved both by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This new therapy has the advantage of being effective for correcting serum calcium levels and significantly reducing the daily requirements of calcium and active vitamin D supplements. However, due to the high cost, a strict selection of candidates to this therapy is necessary. More challenging is the long-term hypocalcemia treatment, due to its associated complications. The development of long-acting recombinant human PTH will probably modify the management of chronic hypoparathyroidism in the future.

Investigating subtle kidney injury in primary hyperparathyroidism by means of sensitive and specific biomarkers.

OBJECTIVE: Kidney involvement is a common complication in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). No study so far has assessed the prevalence of kidney injury developing before the reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in PHPT. The study was aimed at establishing the potential role of biomarkers of kidney injury in detecting subtle renal damage in patients with PHPT. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS: A total of 69 postmenopausal patients with PHPT and 41 healthy age- and sex-matched subjects were studied. Exclusion criteria were as follows: GFR < 30 mL/min, chronic inflammatory disease, nephrotic syndrome, infection, malignancy, heart failure, recent exposure to iodinated contrast media or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. MEASUREMENTS: We measured a panel of sensitive biomarkers of kidney injury in PHPT vs controls. RESULTS: Mean FGF23 and Klotho were higher in PHPT (72 ± 48 and 811 ± 366 pg/mL, respectively) than controls (53 ± 23.5 and 668.6 ± 17; P < .02 and P < .05). Urine KIM-1/uCr was significantly higher in PHPT (1.4-6  ± 1.3-6 ) than controls (9.2-7  ± 7-7 ; P < .05); this was particularly evident in the CrCl 60-89 mL/min category (1.36  ± 97 vs 8.2-7  ± 3.6-7 ; P < .02). Mean values of urine NGAL/uCr were higher in PHPT with (n = 28) compared to those without kidney stones (n = 35; 1.8-5  ± 1.4-5 and 1-5  ± 8-6 ; P < .0001). We found significant positive associations between urine NGAL/uCr and Ca (R = .292, P < .02) and urine KIM1/uCr and PTH (R = .329, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: We propose the utilization of these molecules, particularly urine KIM-1/uCr and urine NGAL/uCr ratios for the assessment of subtle kidney injury in patients with PHPT. These molecules are elevated in tubular necrosis and have potential role in the development of kidney damage in PHPT, according to the severity of the disease.

Screening for hypovitaminosis D: cost-effective or not?

Few topics have elicited more emotion than the issue of screening for vitamin D status and the discussion on the need for global supplementation with vitamin D metabolites. The importance of the problem is highlighted by the USPSTF posted draft research plan with the aim of making an update recommendations statement, possibly next year. Here, we discuss two different viewpoints on screening for vitamin D status: for and against. In the literature there are scientifically sound opinions supporting pro and cons positions. However, we believe that the best way to definitively elucidate this issue is the implementation of a randomized controlled trial evaluating clinical outcomes or harms in persons screened versus those not screened for vitamin D deficiency. The feasibility of such a trial is probably questionable owing to uncertainties still present concerning threshold for vitamin D sufficiency and end points (that is, for example, improved bone mineral density, reduced risk of falls and so on) to be reached.

Controversies Surrounding Vitamin D: Focus on Supplementation and Cancer.

There has recently been a huge number of publications concerning various aspects of vitamin D, from the physiological to therapeutic fields. However, as a consequence of this very fast-growing scientific area, some issues still remain surrounded by uncertainties, without a final agreement having been reached. Examples include the definitions of vitamin D sufficiency and insufficiency, (i.e., 20 vs. 30 ng/mL), the relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and parathyroid hormone, (i.e., linear vs. no linear), the referent to consider, (i.e., total vs. free determination), the utility of screening versus universal supplementation, and so on. In this review, the issues related to vitamin D supplementation in subjects with documented hypovitaminosis, and the role of vitamin D in cancer will be concisely considered. Daily, weekly, or monthly administration of cholecalciferol generally leads to essentially similar results in terms of an increase in 25(OH)D serum levels. However, we should also consider possible differences related to a number of variables, (i.e., efficiency of intestinal absorption, binding to vitamin D binding protein, and so on). Thus, adherence to therapy may be more important than the dose regimen chosen in order to allow long-term compliance in a sometimes very old population already swamped by many drugs. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions at present regarding the relationship between cancer and vitamin D. In vitro and preclinical studies seem to have been more convincing than clinical investigations. Positive results in human studies have been mainly derived from post-hoc analyses, secondary end-points or meta-analyses, with the last showing not a decrease in cancer incidence but rather in mortality. We must therefore proceed with a word of caution. Until it has been clearly demonstrated that there is a causal relationship, these positive "non-primary, end-point results" should be considered as a background for generating new hypotheses for future investigations.

Oral calcidiol is a good form of vitamin D supplementation.

Vitamin D supplementation represents an important topic in the field of metabolic bone disease. Calcidiol, the 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D], is the form of vitamin D most recently introduced in clinical practice. Advantages of the use of calcidiol derive from the pharmacokinetic properties and are related to the possibility of use in patients with liver disease, obese patients, patients with intestinal malabsorption, secondary hyperparathyroidism associated with chronic kidney disease as well as to avoid any possible toxic effect when high doses are used. The ADDI-D study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of calcidiol at the daily dose of 20 or 40 µg and 125 µg/week. In particular, the daily dose of 40 µg can be suggested as an alternative in severely deficient patients, as it has demonstrated to ensure higher vitamin D levels, compared to the 20 µg/day and the weekly 125 µg dose. The last can be an option when issues with compliance to the supplementation are present.

An oral high dose of cholecalciferol restores vitamin D status in deficient postmenopausal HIV-1-infected women independently of protease inhibitors therapy: a pilot study.

The best repletion and maintenance dosing regimens with cholecalciferol in vitamin D-deficient HIV-1 patients remain unknown. Protease inhibitors (PIs) have been shown to inhibit vitamin D 1α- and 25α-hydroxylation in hepatocyte and monocyte cultures. We therefore evaluated the effect of a single high dose of cholecalciferol in vitamin D-deficient HIV-1 postmenopausal women undergoing treatment with highly active anti-retroviral therapy (cART), with and without PIs. Forty HIV-1 postmenopausal women treated with cART, with hypovitaminosis D (<20 ng/ml), were enrolled. We measured serum changes of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]; 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D], parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum calcium, and urinary calcium excretion following a loading dose of 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol after 3, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days. Patients were divided into two groups, whether or not they were taking PI. A significant increase in mean 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D levels at day 3 and throughout the entire observation period was found in both groups (p < 0.001). PTH levels concomitantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.001). Mean albumin-adjusted serum calcium increases with respect to baseline were significant only at day 3 and day 30 for both groups (p < 0.01). Considering remaining parameters, there were no significant differences between the groups at any time, by two-way RM ANOVA. An oral dose of 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol in HIV-1 postmenopausal women rapidly increases 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D levels reducing PTH levels, regardless of the presence of PIs in the cART scheme.

Update on vitamin D: pros and cons.

Controversies on vitamin D currently represent a challenging topic in mineral metabolism research. In particular, current guidelines on vitamin D supplementation did not report consistent recommendation and the issue related to beneficial vs harmful effects of loading vitamin D doses did not lead to any firm universal conclusion. Finally, serum and clinical outcomes of vitamin D supplementation, particularly as far as extra-skeletal effect of the hormone, need to be further investigated.

Six-year follow-up of a characteristic osteolytic lesion in a patient with tumor-induced osteomalacia.

OBJECTIVE: Tumor-induced osteomalacia is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by hypophosphatemia and inappropriately normal or low 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. CLINICAL CASE: Here, we report a 6-year postoperative follow-up of a patient with oncogenic osteomalacia with a distinctive skeletal manifestation. The latter was characterized by an almost linear lytic lesion of a few millimeters with irregular borders, mainly involving the trabecular compartment but extending into cortical shell, located in the middle third of the right fibula. Six years after tumor resection, a sclerotic repair with a complete recovery was observed. Furthermore, we monitored a striking increase in bone mineral density throughout the observation period, reaching a peak of 73% over basal values at lumbar spine after 2 years; at total femur and radius, the peak was 47.5 and 4.6% respectively, after 4 years from tumor resection. CONCLUSIONS: We report for the first time that an osteolytic lesion may be part of the skeletal involvement in tumor-induced osteomalacia.

Management of endocrine disease: value and limitations of assessing vitamin D nutritional status and advised levels of vitamin D supplementation.

The growing attention to the role of vitamin D in skeletal and extra-skeletal diseases over the last decade induced an increased demand for vitamin D determination as well as a dramatic rise of sales of vitamin D supplement. However, several critical points in this field remain to be clarified. We lack a clear consensus about the definition of vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency, and sufficiency. The identification of different thresholds defining vitamin D status has relevant implications in clinical practice. In fact, the worldwide prevalence of low vitamin D status is highly varying according to the level of 25(OH)D utilized to define sufficiency. Therefore, the assessment of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may have a critical role, but a number of different technical problems associated with its determination may interfere in interpreting the results. The hydrophobic nature of vitamin D and the tight binding to its carrier (vitamin D binding protein), the different forms circulating in blood, and the issue of standardization are among the most important factors influencing the measurement of this metabolite. Another controversial point relies on the conflicting guidance on prevention and treatment of vitamin D deficiency endorsed by different medical and scientific communities. In particular, uncertainty exists about how to replete vitamin D stores, how to maintain normal 25(OH)D levels after repletion, which form of vitamin D is preferable for supplementation, and which route of administration and dosing regimens are advisable. Finally, concerns have been raised regarding vitamin D toxicity and its adverse effects.

Long-term bioavailability after a single oral or intramuscular administration of 600,000 IU of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol: implications for treatment and prophylaxis.

CONTEXT: We previously showed that a single high dose of oral (po) cholecalciferol (D3) sharply increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term bioavailability and metabolism of a single po or intramuscular (im) high dose of ergocalciferol (D2) or D3. DESIGN: This was a prospective intervention study. SETTING: The study was conducted in an ambulatory care setting. PATIENTS: Participants were 24 subjects with hypovitaminosis D. INTERVENTIONS: A single dose of 600,000 IU of po or im D2 or D3 was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum 25(OH)D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] were measured at baseline and at days 30, 60, 90, and 120 by RIA. Serum 1,25(OH)2D2, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], 24,25-hydroxyvitamin D2 [24,25(OH)D2], and 24,25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [24,25(OH)D3] were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in a subgroup of patients receiving the po formulations. RESULTS: The areas under the curve of 25(OH)D after D3 were significantly higher than those after D2 (P < .0001). Serum 25(OH)D basal difference significantly increased at day 30 with po D2 and D3 (P < .01 and P < .0001) and up to day 90 with po D3 (P < .01). The im formulations produced a slow increased, and values peaked at day 120 relative to the other time points (P < .0001). We found a decrease in 1,25(OH)2D at day 30 (P < .05) and up to day 120 (P < .001) and an increase in 1,25(OH)2D2 at day 30 (P < .01) and up to day 120 (P < .01) after po D2. Oral D2 and D3 produced increases in 24,25(OH)D2 and 24,25(OH)D3, respectively, at day 30 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A po dose of 600,000 IU of D2 or D3 is initially more effective in increasing serum 25(OH)D than the equivalent im dose and is rapidly metabolized. Our RIA assay for 1,25(OH)2D may not recognize 1,25(OH)2D2.

Effects of strontium ranelate administration on calcium metabolism in female patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and primary hyperparathyroidism.

We investigated possible changes of parameters of calcium metabolism induced by strontium ranelate (SR). Twenty-three patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PO) and 14 with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) were studied while taking 2 g/day of SR. Women with PO and 10 healthy age-matched control women were also daily supplemented with 1,000 mg calcium and 800 IU vitamin D. All subjects were studied at baseline and after 7 and 30 days; PO women and controls were also investigated at 180 and 360 days of treatment. Serum ionized calcium (iCa), phosphate (sP), magnesium, creatinine, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25[OH]D), 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25[OH](2)D), serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured. In spot urine, we assessed calcium and phosphate over creatinine ratios (uCa/Cr, uP/Cr), calcium excretion (Ca ex) and renal phosphate threshold (TmP/GFR); in 24-h urine, calcium and magnesium over creatinine clearance ratios (CaCl/CrCl and MgCl/CrCl). In PO, SR administration was associated with a significant decrease of PTH and 1,25(OH)(2)D levels but an increase of sP (p < 0.001). SR also significantly increased Ca/Cr, Ca ex, and TmP/GFR in spot urine and CaCl/CrCl in both spot and 24-h urine (p = 0.004 to <0.001). In PHPT, SR significantly decreased iCa and increased sP, slightly modifying PTH, 25(OH)D, and 1,25(OH)(2)D values. Also in PHPT, Ca ex and CaCl/CrCl of spot and 24-h urine, as TmP/GFR, significantly increased (all p < 0.02). SR influenced the main parameters of calcium homeostasis, probably through the calcium-sensing receptor.

Metabolic changes following 500 µg monthly administration of calcidiol: a study in normal females.

This study was performed to investigate the effect of monthly oral administration of 500 µg of calcidiol (25-hydroxyvitamin D(3)) for 4 months on both serum vitamin D levels and sequential changes of parameters of calcium metabolism; 18 normal women aged 24-72 years were investigated. There was a significant increase of serum 25(OH)D after the first administration; thereafter all values persisted significantly higher compared to the basal value (P < 0.001). Mean 1,25(OH)(2)D serum levels peaked at day 3 and then tended to stabilize following day 30. During the first month, all mean values observed following the initial administration were significantly higher than basal values. The first calcidiol dose produced a significant reduction of serum PTH levels (P < 0.001), which then remained constant over time. Concerning serum calcium and phosphorus, we were not able to demonstrate any significant change during the entire observation period. Considering the single values for both serum ionized and total calcium, the values of Ca(2+) exceeded upper limits of normal on only two occasions. Regarding biochemical markers of bone remodeling, mean changes of serum bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase activity showed a significant trend to decrease, starting at day 30. No significant changes of serum CTX values were noted. Overall, 24-h urinary excretion of calcium did not change, seven values exceeding the threshold of 4 mg/kg body weight. Monthly administration of 500 µg of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) may be considered an alternative for vitamin D repletion, without any detrimental effect.

The effects of alendronate treatment in osteoporotic patients affected by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

In patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) the increase of bone turnover rate can increase the risk of fracture. Thus, a treatment normalizing this negative balance could be of benefit in these patients. We studied 100 patients affected by MGUS, grouped according to the presence (group A, 50 patients) or absence (group B) of vertebral fractures and/or osteoporosis. Group A was treated with alendronate (70 mg/weekly) plus calcium and cholecalciferol for 18 months, and group B was treated with calcium and cholecalciferol. After 18 months, the mean bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and total femur had increased by 6.1% and 1.5%, respectively, in group A. In the nine patients of this group not taking alendronate, BMD values of the lumbar spine and total femur decreased by 1.6% (P < or = 0.001 ) and 1.3% (P < or = 0.01), respectively. In patients of group B, BMD increased by 1.2% at the lumbar spine and decreased by 1.2% at the total femur. Corresponding figures of those patients in the same group not taking calcium and vitamin D supplementation were -0.1% and -1.2%, respectively. At 18 months we observed significant decreases of serum bone markers: the difference between the groups was -23.2 (P < or = 0.01) for bone alkaline phosphatase, -23.6 for osteocalcin (P < or = 0.01), -35.1 for C-terminal telopeptides of collagen type I (P < or = 0.001), and -0.47 for bone sialoprotein (P = nonsignificant). Treatment with alendronate could lead to a significant reduction in fracture risk in MGUS patients with skeletal fragility.