Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Phytother Res ; 36(12): 4325-4344, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36331011

ABSTRACT

Almond intake may be correlated with improvements in several cardiometabolic parameters, but its effects are controversial in the published literature, and it needs to be comprehensively summarized. We conducted a systematic search in several international electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov until April 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials that examined the effects of almond consumption on cardiometabolic risk factors, inflammatory markers, and liver enzymes. Data were pooled using the random-effects model method and presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-six eligible trials were analyzed (n = 1750 participants). Almond intake significantly decreased diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and very LDL (p < 0.05). The effects of almond intake on systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, insulin, hemoglobin A1c, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, C-peptide, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, C-reactive protein (CRP), hs-CRP (high sensitivity C-reactive protein), interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor-α, ICAM (Intercellular Adhesion Molecule), VCAM (Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule), homocysteine, HDL, ox-LDL, ApoA1, ApoB, and lipoprotien-a were not statistically significant (p > .05). The current body of evidence supports the ingestion of almonds for their beneficial lipid-lowering and antihypertensive effects. However, the effects of almonds on antiinflammatory markers, glycemic control, and hepatic enzymes should be further evaluated via performing more extensive randomized trials.


Subject(s)
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors , Prunus dulcis , Humans , Transferases , Liver
2.
Clin Ther ; 44(2): e11-25.e8, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35256212

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is growing evidence that bone health is decreased in individuals with HIV infection. Vitamin D deficiency is also highly prevalent among HIV-infected patients. The literature was systematically reviewed to determine whether bone health and bone-related parameters may improve with vitamin D supplementation in HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: Four databases were systematically searched for randomized clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation in HIV infection, published from January 1990 to September 2021. No language or publication restrictions were applied. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs are reported. A random-effects model was used to perform meta-analysis. FINDINGS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria (N = 733 participants at study completion). The mean ages of the patients in the included trials ranged from 10 to 49 years. The meta-analysis indicated that with vitamin D supplementation, serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25[OH]D) level was significantly increased (SMD, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.70; I2 = 94.4%), but there were no significant effects on levels of serum 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D (1,25-[OH]2D) (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.64; I2 = 67.4%), total bone mineral density (SMD, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.37; I2 = 00.0%), spine bone mineral density (SMD, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.49; I2 = 17.3%), and parathyroid hormone level (SMD, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.37 to 0.02; I2 = 1.2%) in HIV-infected patients. IMPLICATIONS: This study showed that vitamin D supplementation can improve serum 25(OH)D in HIV-infected patients. The effects of vitamin D supplementation on other bone health-related parameters such as bone mineral density and parathyroid hormone in HIV-infected patients need to be further investigated in larger-scale, well-designed randomized, controlled trials.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Vitamin D Deficiency , Vitamin D , Adolescent , Adult , Bone Density/drug effects , Child , Dietary Supplements , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/metabolism , Humans , Middle Aged , Parathyroid Hormone , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Vitamin D Deficiency/diagnosis , Vitamin D Deficiency/drug therapy , Vitamin D Deficiency/virology , Young Adult
3.
Clin Ther ; 43(12): e346-e363, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34857394

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Despite extensive research, findings regarding the effects of folic acid supplementation on inflammatory mediators have been controversial and inconclusive. This study therefore aimed to summarize the findings of all available clinical trials regarding the effects of folic acid supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers in adults. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar until April 2020. All randomized controlled trials that examined the influence of folic acid supplementation on C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were included. Pooled effect sizes were calculated based on the random effects model, and dose-response analysis was modeled by using a fractional polynomial model. FINDINGS: In total, 18 randomized controlled trials involving 2286 participants were analyzed. Folic acid supplementation significantly reduced serum levels of C-reactive protein (mean difference [MD], -0.21 mg/L; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.01; n = 16), TNF-α (MD, -14.88 pg/mL; 95% CI, -23.68 to -6.09; n = 10), and IL-6 (MD, -0.93 pg/mL; 95% CI, -1.72 to -0.14; n = 11). Subgroup analyses suggested a significant reduction at doses ≤5 mg/d and studies longer than 12 weeks in duration. A significant nonlinear association was also found between folic acid dosage (Pnonlinearity <0.001) and duration of administration (Pnonlinearity <0.001) with serum TNF-α levels. IMPLICATIONS: This meta-analysis indicates the beneficial effects of folic acid supplementation on pro-inflammatory cytokines. Further studies with a longer duration of administration, higher doses, and larger sample sizes should be performed exclusively on patients with chronic inflammatory disorders to elucidate the favorable role of folate intake on inflammatory biomarkers. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews identifier: CRD42021249947.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Inflammation Mediators , Adult , Biomarkers , Folic Acid , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 15(6): 102311, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34678576

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Possible protective effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L) have been reported in several randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Current systematic review was performed to summarize the efficacy of saffron intake on liver enzymes. METHODS: An electronic database search was conducted on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane for RCTs comparing effect of saffron and placebo on liver enzymes from inception to July 2021. There was no restriction in language of included studies and we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for each variable. Random-effect model was used to calculate effect size. RESULTS: Eight studies (n = 463 participants) were included in the systematic review. The saffron intake was associated with a statistically significant decrease in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (SMD: -0.18; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.02; I2 = 0%) in comparison to placebo intake. Our results also indicated that saffron consumption did not have a significant effect on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (SMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.36, 0.09; I2 = 47.0%) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels (SMD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.18, 0.46; I2 = 42.9%) compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Saffron intake showed beneficial impacts on circulating AST levels. However, larger well-designed RCTs are still needed to clarify the effect of saffron intake on these and other liver enzymes.


Subject(s)
Aspartate Aminotransferases/antagonists & inhibitors , Crocus , Dietary Supplements , Liver/drug effects , Liver/enzymology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Alanine Transaminase/antagonists & inhibitors , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Humans
5.
Phytomedicine ; 90: 153661, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34334274

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is the one of the main causes of mortality worldwide. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have revealed the beneficial effects of sumac (Rhus coriaria) on cardiometabolic risk factors. However, the entirety of the evidence has yet to be summarized in a systematic review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of sumac on several cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with MetS and related disorders. METHODS: We reviewed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL for RCTs published from inception to December 2020 evaluating the impact of sumac in adults with MetS or related disorders. Outcome measures included anthropometric measures, glycemic indices, blood lipids, blood pressure and liver enzymes. Pooled effect sizes were reported as standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Trials were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: Nine studies enrolling 526 participants met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. Our results indicate that sumac intake significantly decrease fasting blood sugar (FBS) (SMD: -0.28; 95% CI: -0.54, -0.02; I2 = 00.0%), insulin (SMD: -0.67; 95% CI: -0.99, -0.36; I2 = 03.7%), and insulin resistance (measured through the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)) (SMD: -0.79; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.34; I2 = 50.1%). Sumac intake did not have a significant impact on weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high density lipoproteins (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT). CONCLUSION: Sumac, as an adjuvant therapy, may decrease serum levels of FBS, insulin and HOMA-IR. However, due to high heterogeneity in the included studies, these findings must be interpreted with great caution. Larger, well-designed placebo-controlled clinical trials are still needed to further evaluate the capacity of sumac as a complementary treatment to control MetS risk factors.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Fruit , Metabolic Syndrome , Rhus , Adult , Blood Glucose , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rhus/chemistry
6.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 141: 111849, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34214729

ABSTRACT

Curcumin is a bioactive ingredient found in the Rhizomes of Curcuma longa. Curcumin is well known for its chemopreventive and anti-cancer properties. Recent findings have demonstrated several pharmacological and biological impacts of curcumin, related to the control and the management of gastrointestinal cancers. Mechanistically, curcumin exerts its biological impacts via antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects through the interaction with various transcription factors and signaling molecules. Moreover, epigenetic modulators such as microRNAs (miRNAs) have been revealed as novel targets of curcumin. Curcumin was discovered to regulate the expression of numerous pathogenic miRNAs in gastric, colorectal, esophageal and liver cancers. The present systematic review was performed to identify miRNAs that are modulated by curcumin in gastrointestinal cancers.


Subject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents/pharmacology , Carcinogenesis/drug effects , Curcumin/pharmacology , Epigenesis, Genetic/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , MicroRNAs/biosynthesis , MicroRNAs/genetics , Animals , Curcuma/chemistry , Humans , Plant Extracts
7.
BMC Nephrol ; 22(1): 160, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933009

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omega-3 fatty acids (FAs) have been suggested as a beneficial supplement in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, but the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate all the RCTs about the impact of omega-3 FAs supplementation on cardiometabolic outcomes and oxidative stress parameters in patients with CKD. METHODS: We performed a systematic database search in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, up to May 2020. We included all placebo-controlled randomized trials that assessed the effect of omega-3 FAs supplementation on any cardiometabolic outcomes: blood pressure, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or triglycerides (TG) and oxidative stress parameters. Data were pooled using DerSimonian-Laird's random-effects model. RESULTS: Finally, thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria for this review omega-3 FAs supplementation significantly decrease TC (SMD: -0.26; 95% CI: - 0.51, - 0.02; I2 = 52.7%), TG (SMD: -0.22; 95% CI: - 0.43, - 0.02; I2 = 36.0%) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (SMD: -0.91; 95% CI: - 1.29, - 0.54; I2 = 00.0%) and also significantly increase superoxide dismutase (SOD) (SMD: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.90; I2 = 00.0%) and Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (SMD: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.86; I2 = 00.0%) activities. However our results show that omega-3 FAs supplementation have no significant effects on HDL, LDL and blood pressure. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis supports current evidence for the clinical benefit of omega-3 FAs intake to improve cardiometabolic parameters in CKD patients. However, well-designed RCTs still needed to provide a conclusive picture in this field.


Subject(s)
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors , Dietary Supplements , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/therapeutic use , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cholesterol/blood , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Triglycerides/blood
8.
Clin Nutr Res ; 10(1): 36-47, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33564651

ABSTRACT

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a significant public health problem globally and the most notable chronic liver disease in Asian countries. Various dietary supplements have been assessed as potential methods to alleviate the metabolic damages related to NAFLD, but the results of these works have been equivocal. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotic yogurt fortified with vitamin D (Pro-YFD) on glycemic and anthropometric indices in patients with NAFLD. One hundred and four NAFLD patients of both sexes were randomly allocated to 2 groups: group A (Pro-YFD) and group B (unfortified yogurt). The intervention period was 3 months. Fasting blood samples were obtained for measuring fasting blood sugar (FBS) and insulin level. Food intake was measured using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Body composition was estimated by bio-impedance. Eighty-eight patients completed the study. The mean serum level of 25(OH)D3 was elevated significantly (p < 0.001), while insulin level decreased significantly (p < 0.003) in group A at the end of the study. FBS levels showed no significant differences between the groups at the end of the trial. Also, there were no significant changes in diet caloric intake, physical activity, or anthropometric indices in the 2 groups during the interventions. Pro-YFD in the diets of patients with NAFLD may attenuate insulin resistance and improve serum level of 25(OH)D3.

9.
Complement Ther Med ; 53: 102512, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33066852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a significant neurobehavioral disorder in children and adolescence which may be affected by diet. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible relationship between sugar consumption and the development of symptoms of ADHD. METHODS: In March 2020, an exhaustive systematic literature search was conducted using Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus. In this meta-analysis of observational studies, odds ratios, relative risks, hazard ratios, and their 95% confidence intervals, which was reported for ADHD regarding SSBS, soft drink consumption, and dietary sugars, were used to calculate ORs and standard errors. At first, a fixed-effects model was used to drive the overall effect sizes using log ORs and SEs. If there was any significant between-studies heterogeneity, the random-effects model was conducted. Cochran's Q test and I2 were used to measure potential sources of heterogeneity across studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included articles. RESULTS: Seven studies, two cross-sectional, two case-control, and three prospective with a total of 25,945 individuals were eligible to include in the current meta-analysis. The association between sugar and soft drink consumption and the risk of ADHD symptoms were provided based on the random-effects model (pooled effect size: 1.22, 95%CI: 1.04-1.42, P = 0.01) (I² = 81.9%, P heterogeneity< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicated a positive relationship between overall sugar and sugar-sweetened beverages consumption and symptoms of ADHD; however, there was heterogeneity among included studies. Future well-designed studies that can account for confounds are necessary to confirm the effect of sugar on ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/metabolism , Dietary Sugars/adverse effects , Sugar-Sweetened Beverages/adverse effects , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL