Electrogram morphology discriminators in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A comparative evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Morphology algorithms are currently recommended as a standalone discriminator in single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, these proprietary algorithms differ in both design and nominal programming. OBJECTIVE: To compare three different algorithms with nominal versus advanced programming in their ability to discriminate between ventricular (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). METHODS: In nine European centers, VT and SVTs were collected from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic dual- and triple-chamber ICDs via their respective remote monitoring portals. Percentage morphology matches were recorded for selected episodes which were classified as VT or SVT by means of atrioventricular comparison. The sensitivity and related specificity of each manufacturer discriminator was determined at various values of template match percentage from receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 534 episodes were retained for the analysis. In ROC analyses, Abbott Far Field MD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.91; P < .001) and Boston Scientific RhythmID (AUC: 0.95; P < .001) show higher AUC than Medtronic Wavelet (AUC: 0.81; P < .001) when tested for their ability to discriminate VT from SVT. At nominal % match threshold all devices provided high sensitivity in VT identification, (91%, 100%, and 90%, respectively, for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic) but contrasted specificities in SVT discrimination (85%, 41%, and 62%, respectively). Abbott and Medtronic's nominal thresholds were similar to the optimal thresholds. Optimization of the % match threshold improved the Boston Scientific specificity to 79% without compromising the sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Proprietary morphology discriminators show important differences in their ability to discriminate SVT. How much this impact the overall discrimination process remains to be investigated.

Localized Structural Alterations Underlying a Subset of Unexplained Sudden Cardiac Death.

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death because of ventricular fibrillation (VF) is commonly unexplained in younger victims. Detailed electrophysiological mapping in such patients has not been reported. METHODS: We evaluated 24 patients (29±13 years) who survived idiopathic VF. First, we used multielectrode body surface recordings to identify the drivers maintaining VF. Then, we analyzed electrograms in the driver regions using endocardial and epicardial catheter mapping during sinus rhythm. Established electrogram criteria were used to identify the presence of structural alterations. RESULTS: VF occurred spontaneously in 3 patients and was induced in 16, whereas VF was noninducible in 5. VF mapping demonstrated reentrant and focal activities (87% versus 13%, respectively) in all. The activities were dominant in one ventricle in 9 patients, whereas they had biventricular distribution in others. During sinus rhythm areas of abnormal electrograms were identified in 15/24 patients (62.5%) revealing localized structural alterations: in the right ventricle in 11, the left ventricle in 1, and both in 3. They covered a limited surface (13±6 cm2) representing 5±3% of the total surface and were recorded predominantly on the epicardium. Seventy-six percent of these areas were colocated with VF drivers (P<0.001). In the 9 patients without structural alteration, we observed a high incidence of Purkinje triggers (7/9 versus 4/15, P=0.033). Catheter ablation resulted in arrhythmia-free outcome in 15/18 patients at 17±11 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that localized structural alterations underlie a significant subset of previously unexplained sudden cardiac death. In the other subset, Purkinje electrical pathology seems as a dominant mechanism.

Distinctive Left Ventricular Activations Associated With ECG Pattern in Heart Failure Patients.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), heart failure patients with narrow QRS and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD) display a relatively limited response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to compare left ventricular (LV) activation patterns in heart failure patients with narrow QRS and NICD to patients with LBBB using high-density electroanatomic activation maps. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two heart failure patients (narrow QRS [n=18], LBBB [n=11], NICD [n=23]) underwent 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping with a high density of mapping points (387±349 LV). Adjunctive scar imaging was available in 37 (71%) patients and was analyzed in relation to activation maps. LBBB patients typically demonstrated (1) a single LV breakthrough at the septum (38±15 ms post-QRS onset); (2) prolonged right-to-left transseptal activation with absence of direct LV Purkinje activity; (3) homogeneous propagation within the LV cavity; and (4) latest activation at the basal lateral LV. In comparison, both NICD and narrow QRS patients demonstrated (1) multiple LV breakthroughs along the posterior or anterior fascicles: narrow QRS versus LBBB, 5±2 versus 1±1; P=0.0004; NICD versus LBBB, 4±2 versus 1±1; P=0.001); (2) evidence of early/pre-QRS LV electrograms with Purkinje potentials; (3) rapid propagation in narrow QRS patients and more heterogeneous propagation in NICD patients; and (4) presence of limited areas of late activation associated with LV scar with high interindividual heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to LBBB patients, narrow QRS and NICD patients are characterized by distinct mechanisms of LV activation, which may predict poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Mechanisms of Undersensing by a Noise Detection Algorithm That Utilizes Far-Field Electrograms With Near-Field Bandpass Filtering.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) must establish a balance between delivering appropriate shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias and withholding inappropriate shocks for lead-related oversensing ("noise"). To improve the specificity of ICD therapy, manufacturers have developed proprietary algorithms that detect lead noise. The SecureSenseTM RV Lead Noise discrimination (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) algorithm is designed to differentiate oversensing due to lead failure from ventricular tachyarrhythmias and withhold therapies in the presence of sustained lead-related oversensing. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report 5 patients in whom appropriate ICD therapy was withheld due to the operation of the SecureSense algorithm and explain the mechanism for inhibition of therapy in each case. Limitations of algorithms designed to increase ICD therapy specificity, especially for the SecureSense algorithm, are analyzed. CONCLUSION: The SecureSense algorithm can withhold appropriate therapies for ventricular arrhythmias due to design and programming limitations. Electrophysiologists should have a thorough understanding of the SecureSense algorithm before routinely programming it and understand the implications for ventricular arrhythmia misclassification.

Noninvasive mapping of electrical dyssynchrony in heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Causes for diverse effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are poorly understood. Because CRT is an electrical therapy, it may be best understood by detailed characterization of electrical substrate and its interaction with pacing. Electrocardiogram (ECG) features affect CRT outcomes. However, the surface ECG reports rudimentary electrical data. In contrast, noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging provides high-resolution single-beat ventricular mapping. Several complex characteristics of electrical substrate, not decipherable from the 12-lead ECG, are linked to CRT effect. CRT response may be improved by candidate selection and left ventricular lead placement directed by more precise electrical evaluation, on an individual patient basis.

Driver domains in persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Specific noninvasive signal processing was applied to identify drivers in distinct categories of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 103 consecutive patients with persistent AF, accurate biatrial geometry relative to an array of 252 body surface electrodes was obtained from a noncontrast computed tomography scan. The reconstructed unipolar AF electrograms acquired at bedside from multiple windows (duration, 9±1 s) were signal processed to identify the drivers (focal or reentrant activity) and their cumulative density map. The driver domains were catheter ablated by using AF termination as the procedural end point in comparison with the stepwise-ablation control group. The maps showed incessantly changing beat-to-beat wave fronts and varying spatiotemporal behavior of driver activities. Reentries were not sustained (median, 2.6 rotations lasting 449±89 ms), meandered substantially but recurred repetitively in the same region. In total, 4720 drivers were identified in 103 patients: 3802 (80.5%) reentries and 918 (19.5%) focal breakthroughs; most of them colocalized. Of these, 69% reentries and 71% foci were in the left atrium. Driver ablation alone terminated 75% and 15% of persistent and long-lasting AF, respectively. The number of targeted driver regions increased with the duration of continuous AF: 2 in patients presenting in sinus rhythm, 3 in AF lasting 1 to 3 months, 4 in AF lasting 4 to 6 months, and 6 in AF lasting longer. The termination rate sharply declined after 6 months. The mean radiofrequency delivery to AF termination was 28±17 minutes versus 65±33 minutes in the control group (P<0.0001). At 12 months, 85% patients with AF termination were free from AF, similar to the control population (87%,); P=not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent AF in early months is maintained predominantly by drivers clustered in a few regions, most of them being unstable reentries.

Microbiologic characteristics and in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobials in a large population of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is steadily increasing. However, no consensus has been reached with respect to the type and duration of antimicrobial therapy in this specific population of patients. The role played by new anti-Staphylococcus agents has not been defined. The aims of this study were to describe the microbiological characteristics of a large population of patients with CIED infections and to test the in vitro susceptibility of the various strains to different antimicrobials. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-six patients with CIED infection were included. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of 9 antimicrobials, including linezolid, tigecycline, and daptomycin were measured against all strains of staphylococci isolated. RESULTS: Microbiologic confirmation was obtained in 252 (88%) patients, the vast majority were from Staphylococcus species (86%), 90% of these were coagulase negative strains and 10% were Staphylococcus aureus; 30.5% were methicillin-resistant. All strains were susceptible to vancomycin, nearly 15% of coagulase negative strains were nonsusceptible to teicoplanin, and nearly 100% of the strains were susceptible to the 3 new antimicrobials. CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary study, we show that Staphylococcus is by far the most common cause of CIED infections, with the majority due to coagulase negative strains. Methicillin-resistance is common in this population. Currently, we would recommend vancomycin as first-line empirical therapy. However, given that not all patients tolerate vancomycin, we believe that newer antimicrobial therapies should now be tested in clinical trials to establish their clinical effectiveness in treating patients with device infections.

Left ventricular endocardial stimulation for severe heart failure.

Biventricular resynchronization, a therapy recommended for patients presenting with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and ventricular dyssynchrony, requires the implantation of an LV lead, usually placed in a lateral or posterolateral tributary of the coronary sinus. Despite important progress made in the development of dedicated instrumentation, the procedure remains sometimes challenging and unsuccessful in a minority of patients. In the rare instances of unsuccessful transvenous implantations occurring in the presence of major surgical contraindications, a few operators have implanted the LV lead transseptally, an approach limited by technical difficulties and by the thromboembolic risk associated with the presence of a lead inside the LV cavity. The interest in this approach was recently renewed by 2 studies in an animal model and in humans, respectively, which both found a distinctly superior hemodynamic performance associated with endocardial compared with epicardial stimulation. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of LV endocardial stimulation, examines the various techniques of LV endocardial stimulation, and projects their future applications in light of these highly promising recent results. The implementation of endocardial stimulation will ultimately depend on: 1) the development of safe, effective, and durable instrumentation, and reliable and reproducible intraprocedural methods to identify the optimal site of stimulation; and 2) the completion of controlled trials confirming the superiority of this technique compared with standard cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Remote implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring in a Brugada syndrome population.

AIMS: The diagnosis of Brugada syndrome (BS) is typically made in a young and otherwise healthy population. In patients with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), the only currently recommended therapy is an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), but these are not without complications. We investigated whether remote ICD monitoring could simplify follow-up and detect potential complications in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients (26 males, 44 +/- 11 years) implanted with an ICD for BS with a remote monitoring ['Home Monitoring' (HM), Biotronik, Germany] system were prospectively enrolled in this study. They were matched for age, sex, and follow-up duration with 35 BS patients implanted with an ICD without this capability. During a mean follow-up of 33 +/- 17 months, the number of cardiology consultations was significantly lower in the HM group (3 +/- 2 vs. 7 +/- 3; P < 0.001). Inappropriate shock(s) [IS(s)] occurred in three patients (8.5%) in the HM group vs. six (17%) in the control group (P = NS). Ten patients in the HM group had a median of four alerts ('ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation detection' in all patients, 'shock' in three, 'ineffective shock' in two patients with shock on noise, 'extreme ventricular pacing impedance' in one patient due to lead failure, and 'deactivated therapy' in two patients with lead failure before replacement). In 5 of these 10 patients, prompt reprogramming of the ICD may have prevented IS(s). CONCLUSION: Remote ICD monitoring in patients with BS decreases outpatient consultations and may help prevent ISs.