Arnica Ointment 10% Does Not Improve Upper Blepharoplasty Outcome: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that arnica can reduce postoperative edema and ecchymosis associated with cosmetic surgical procedures and improve outcome. Despite a high incidence of arnica use among upper blepharoplasty patients, evidence to support its treatment effect is lacking. The authors performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of arnica ointment after upper blepharoplasty. METHODS: One hundred thirty-six bilateral upper blepharoplasty patients were randomized between arnica ointment 10% and placebo ointment. In both study arms, one periorbital area was designated as the treatment side (either arnica or placebo ointment), and the contralateral side served as an untreated (no ointment) internal control. As the primary endpoint, the overall periorbital appearance as based on light photography and judged by a medical and nonmedical panel, was assessed after 3 days, 7 days, and 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints were swelling, ecchymosis, erythema, pain, and patient satisfaction with recovery and outcome. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between arnica and placebo in overall judgment of periorbital appearance 3 days, 7 days, and 6 weeks after surgery. Furthermore, swelling, ecchymosis, erythema, pain, and patient satisfaction with recovery and outcome did not differ between arnica and placebo. Postoperative outcome in untreated eyelids was not different from eyelids treated with either arnica or placebo on any of the studied outcome measures. CONCLUSION: The authors' study demonstrates that topical arnica ointment after upper blepharoplasty does not improve postoperative outcome. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

A randomised double-blinded crossover study comparing pain during anaesthetising the eyelids in upper blepharoplasty: First versus second eyelid and lidocaine versus prilocaine.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate whether infiltration of the upper eyelid skin is less painful with prilocaine than with lidocaine. METHODS: In 40 consecutive patients scheduled for bilateral upper blepharoplasty, one upper eyelid was anaesthetised with lidocaine with epinephrine and the other with prilocaine with felypressin. After injection of each upper eyelid, the patient scored the pain experienced on infiltration using a visual analogue scale (0-10). In addition, the surgeon scored the need for reinjection during the operation; differences in perioperative bleeding; and degree of oedema, erythema and haematoma before discharge on a four-point rating scale (no, minimal, moderate or severe). RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly lower in upper eyelids injected with lidocaine than in those injected with prilocaine (p = 0.036). In addition, scores for oedema, erythema and haematoma were significantly lower in upper eyelids anaesthetised with lidocaine than in those anaesthetised with prilocaine (respectively, p = 0.001, p = 0.004 and p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with prilocaine with felypressin, lidocaine with epinephrine is significantly less painful in anaesthetising the upper eyelids; gives significantly less postoperative oedema, erythema and haematoma; and provides better haemostasis during upper blepharoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This was a level II, randomised double-blinded crossover study.