Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Heart ; 106(24): 1890-1897, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33020224

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To monitor hospital activity for presentation, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases during the COVID-19) pandemic to inform on indirect effects. METHODS: Retrospective serial cross-sectional study in nine UK hospitals using hospital activity data from 28 October 2019 (pre-COVID-19) to 10 May 2020 (pre-easing of lockdown) and for the same weeks during 2018-2019. We analysed aggregate data for selected cardiovascular diseases before and during the epidemic. We produced an online visualisation tool to enable near real-time monitoring of trends. RESULTS: Across nine hospitals, total admissions and emergency department (ED) attendances decreased after lockdown (23 March 2020) by 57.9% (57.1%-58.6%) and 52.9% (52.2%-53.5%), respectively, compared with the previous year. Activity for cardiac, cerebrovascular and other vascular conditions started to decline 1-2 weeks before lockdown and fell by 31%-88% after lockdown, with the greatest reductions observed for coronary artery bypass grafts, carotid endarterectomy, aortic aneurysm repair and peripheral arterial disease procedures. Compared with before the first UK COVID-19 (31 January 2020), activity declined across diseases and specialties between the first case and lockdown (total ED attendances relative reduction (RR) 0.94, 0.93-0.95; total hospital admissions RR 0.96, 0.95-0.97) and after lockdown (attendances RR 0.63, 0.62-0.64; admissions RR 0.59, 0.57-0.60). There was limited recovery towards usual levels of some activities from mid-April 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial reductions in total and cardiovascular activities are likely to contribute to a major burden of indirect effects of the pandemic, suggesting they should be monitored and mitigated urgently.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiology Service, Hospital/trends , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/trends , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Needs Assessment/trends , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Humans , Patient Admission/trends , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , United Kingdom
2.
Mt Sinai J Med ; 71(2): 103-14, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15029402

ABSTRACT

Primary pulmonary hypertension is a rare disease of the pulmonary vasculature manifested by dyspnea on exertion, syncope, and signs and symptoms of right heart failure. In the absence of adequate treatment, primary pulmonary hypertension has a grave prognosis, with a median survival of 2.8 years. Pulmonary arterial hypertension develops in association with known risk factors and predisposing clinical conditions, and shares many clinical, pathological and therapeutic characteristics with primary pulmonary hypertension. Therapeutic choices in pulmonary arterial hypertension depend on the etiology of the disease, severity of functional impairment and hemodynamic response following acute vasodilator administration during right heart catheterization. Agents currently approved for the specific treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension are continuous intravenous epoprostenol, subcutaneous treprostinil and oral bosentan. A small group of patients who demonstrate true acute vasoreactivity at right heart catheterization may be chronically treated with oral calcium channel blockers. In addition, most patients with pulmonary hypertension receive conventional treatment, represented by anticoagulants, diuretics, inotropic medication or oxygen supplementation. Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension has significantly altered the natural course of the disease, with pronounced symptomatic, functional and survival benefit. Current clinical research focuses on the discovery of new targets of therapy and the use of a combination treatment approach, which will offer hope and valuable insight into the pathogenetic basis of this devastating illness.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Epoprostenol/analogs & derivatives , Hypertension, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Algorithms , Bosentan , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Epoprostenol/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/surgery , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use
3.
Cardiol Clin ; 21(4): 639-55, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14719573

ABSTRACT

MR and CT imaging are emerging as promising complementary imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of CAD and for the detection of subclinical atherosclerotic disease. For the detection or exclusion of significant CAD, both cardiac CT (including coronary calcium screening and non-invasive coronary angiography), and cardiac MRI (using stress function and stress perfusion imaging) are becoming widely available for routine clinical evaluation. Their high negative predictive value, especially when combining two or more of these modalities, allows the exclusion of significant CAD with high certainty, provided that patients are selected appropriately. The primary goal of current investigations using this combined imaging approach is to reduce the number of unnecessary diagnostic coronary catheterizations, and not to replace cardiac catheterization altogether. For the diagnosis of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis and for screening for subclinical disease, CT and MRI have shown potential to directly image the atherosclerotic lesion, measure atherosclerotic burden, and characterize the plaque components. The information obtained may be used to assess progression and regression of atherosclerosis and may open new areas for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of coronary atherosclerosis. Further clinical investigation is needed to define the technical requirements for optimal imaging, develop accurate quantitative image analysis techniques, outline criteria for image interpretation, and define the clinical indications for both MR or CT imaging. Additional studies are also needed to address the cost effectiveness of such a combined approach versus other currently available imaging modalities.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Humans , Image Enhancement , Patient Selection , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 20(6): 1491-8, 2002 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11896096

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The toxicity profile of fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy given on 5 consecutive days at doses of 370 to 450 mg/m(2) has been well documented. A meta-analysis of six North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) cancer control trials involving 786 patients indicated that women treated with this type of regimen experienced more severe stomatitis and leukopenia than men. After these findings, an additional meta-analysis of the toxicity profiles on five NCCTG colorectal cancer treatment trials was undertaken. METHODS: Data for 1,093 women and 1,355 men from 12 different treatment arms were included. The primary end points were the incidence of stomatitis, leukopenia, alopecia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, recorded with standard National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. Fisher's exact test was used to compare incidence and severity across sexes, supplemented by Forrest meta-analysis plots and logistic regression. RESULTS: The incidence of four out of six toxicities studied was significantly greater for women than men; the exceptions were severe nausea and vomiting. Overall, almost half of the women compared with a third of the men experienced severe toxicity (P <.0001). Logistic regression confirmed the univariate findings while adjusting for the effects of study, dose, body mass index, and age. The differences were consistent across treatment cycles. Response rates and survival distributions were the same for both sexes. CONCLUSION: This study confirms an earlier finding that women receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy in a 5-day bolus schedule experience toxicity more frequently and with more severity than men. These data raise the question of whether the recommended initial dose of 5-FU-based chemotherapy for women should be lower than that for men.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Stomatitis/chemically induced , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL