Efficacy of humanlike Augmentin SR (2000/125 mg) twice daily treatment on Haemophilus influenzae experimental pneumonia in rabbits.

We investigated the efficacy of 2 formulations of Augmentin on experimental pneumonia due to Haemophilus influenzae (HI) in rabbits. Two strains were used (H128 and 401285) with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid MICs of 1/0.5 mg/l and 4/2 mg/l. Pneumonia was induced in immunocompetent rabbits by inoculation of 10 log(10) CFU HI. The treatments were infused by using computer controlled pumps in order to mimic the human pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of either conventional Augmentin treatment (875/125 mg twice daily) or the sustained release formulation (SR: 2000/125 mg twice daily). After 2 d of treatment, the bacterial concentrations in the lungs were similar for both strains and both treatments: isolate H128, conventional Augmentin reduced bacterial numbers to 3.8+/-2.1 log(10) CFU/g and Augmentin SR to 3.1+/-2.4 log(10) CFU/g; isolate 401285, conventional Augmentin to 3.5+/-2. Thus, both treatments demonstrated similar efficacy against H. influenzae pneumonia in this model, even when induced by a strain with an amoxicillin/clavulanic acid MIC of 4/2 mg/l. These results support current breakpoints for conventional Augmentin against H. influenzae and suggest that Augmentin SR is at least as effective against these isolates.

The impact of mechanical ventilation on the moxifloxacin treatment of experimental pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVE: Streptococcus pneumoniae is a leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia and is responsible for early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia as well. In intensive care units, community-acquired pneumonia is still associated with a mortality rate of up to 30%, especially when mechanical ventilation is required. Our objective was to study to what extent MV could influence the efficacy of moxifloxacin in a rabbit model of pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective experimental study. SETTING: University hospital laboratory. SUBJECTS: Male New Zealand White rabbits (n = 75). INTERVENTIONS: S. pneumoniae (16089 strain; minimal inhibitory concentration for moxifloxacin = 0.125 mg/L) was instilled intrabronchially. Four hours later, a human-like moxifloxacin treatment was initiated in spontaneously breathing (SB) and mechanically ventilated (MV) animals. Untreated rabbits were used as controls. Survivors were killed 48 hrs later. Pneumonia was assessed and moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics were analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Moxifloxacin treatment was associated with an improvement in survival in the SB animals (13 of 13 [100%] vs. eight of 37 [21.6%] controls). The survival rate was less influenced by treatment in MV rabbits (seven of 15 [46.1%] vs. one of eight [12.5%] controls). The lung bacterial burden was greater in MV compared with SB rabbits (5.1 +/- 2.4 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.4 log10 colony-forming units/g, respectively). Nearly all the untreated animals presented bacteremia as reflected by a positive spleen culture. No bacteremia was found in SB animals treated with moxifloxacin. In contrast, three of 13 (23.1%) moxifloxacin-treated and MV animals had positive spleen cultures. The apparent volume of distribution of moxifloxacin was lower in MV compared with SB rabbits. CONCLUSIONS: In our model of moxifloxacin-treated S. pneumoniae pneumonia, mechanical ventilation was associated with a higher mortality rate and seemed to promote bacterial growth as well as systemic spread of the infection. In addition, the volume of distribution of moxifloxacin was reduced in the presence of mechanical ventilation. Although the roles of factors such as anesthesia, paralysis, and endotracheal tube insertion could not be established, these results suggest that mechanical ventilation may impair host lung defense, rendering antibiotic therapy less effective.

Mutant selection window in levofloxacin and moxifloxacin treatments of experimental pneumococcal pneumonia in a rabbit model of human therapy.

For some pneumococci the fluoroquinolone MICs are low but the mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) are high; this difference defines in vitro the mutant selection window (MSW). We investigated in vivo the bacterial reduction and the occurrence of resistant mutants with moxifloxacin (MFX; 400 mg once daily) or levofloxacin (LVX; 500 mg twice daily) in treatments similar to those in humans with experimental pneumonia due to pneumococci (expPP) exhibiting various MICs and MPCs. The MIC/MPC for MFX and LVX and genotypes were as follows: strain 16089, 0.125/0.125 and 0.5/0.5 (wild type); strain MS1A, 0.25/0.25 and 1/2 (efflux); strain MS2A, 0.25/4 and 1.75/28 (parC79); strain MR3B4, 0.25/4 and 2/32 (parC79); strain M16, 0.5/2 and 8/32 (parC83); strain Gyr-1207, 1.5/3 and 8/16 (gyrA); and strain MQ3A, 4/4 and 16/64 (parC and gyrA). Both drugs were efficient with wild type-expPP, but only MFX was efficient with efflux-expPP. No bacterial reduction was observed for parC-expPPs due to mutants observed in 18 to 100% of animals, depending on the strain and the drug tested. These mutants showed unbound area under the concentration-time curve and MICs of from 50 to 164 for MFX. The in vivo pharmacodynamic boundaries of the MSW were different for MFX and LVX. We conclude that, after LVX or MFX treatment, mutants occur in vivo if there is a preexisting parC mutation, since the drug concentrations fall below the MPCs of these strains. Since the MPC determination cannot be routinely determined, these phenotypes or genotypes should be detected by simple tests to guide the therapeutic options.

Efficacy and pharmacodynamics of simulated human-like treatment with levofloxacin on experimental pneumonia induced with penicillin-resistant pneumococci with various susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones.

Newer fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin, have shown an enhanced in vitro and in vivo activity against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infections. The frequency of S. pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to quinolones, although currently low, raises the question of the therapeutic efficacy of levofloxacin on infection due to such strains. We used an animal model of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia using six strains with various levels of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in rabbits to induce pneumonia, and simulated a human-like treatment of 500 mg twice a day for 48 h. Strains' susceptibility profiles for ciprofloxacin and levofloxaxin were (ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin MIC, mg/L; genotype): 0.5/0.5 (Cip0.5), 2/1 (Cip2), 4/1.75 (Cip4), 8/1.75 (parC mutation) (Cip8), 10/2 (parC mutation) (Cip10), 64/16 (parC and gyrA mutations) (Cip64), respectively. All the strains induced a crude pneumonia in all rabbits. Significant bacterial reductions at the end of treatment in lung and spleen were observed for the four former strains (P < 0.05) but not for the latter two. An AUC/MIC ratio of at least 32 identified 95% of an at least bacteriostatic effect (P = 0.038) and 76% of a bactericidal effect (P = 0.09). Mutants were detected in treated animals infected with strains harbouring parC mutations (Cip8 and Cip10) and when the AUC/MIC ratio was between 13 and 31. We conclude that levofloxacin is effective against experimental pneumonia due to pneumococci with MIC < 1.5 mg/L, ineffective on experimental pneumonia due to pneumococci with MIC > or = 2 mg/L, and could be associated with the appearance of mutants when a parC mutation is pre-existing.