ABSTRACT
In this review, we describe how pollen counts are performed, the health effects caused by exposure to varying amounts of pollen, the clinical utility of reporting pollen counts to the public, and how that information can be used by patients who have allergies to improve their health. The public is very interested in pollen counts, particularly if the counts provide a forecast of expected pollen exposure for the next few days. Traditional pollen counts are labor-intensive; poorly distributed; and, since the counts are usually 1-day-old, do not provide forecasts that can be acted on. New methods that provide short- and long-term pollen forecasts can provide this information to allergic individuals so that they can respond to changing outdoor conditions. Studies of the relationship between artificial and natural exposure to pollen and development of symptoms have provided improved understanding into how much pollen it takes to cause symptoms. Thresholds for pollen counts that trigger symptoms vary by pollen type, sensitivity of the population, and interactions with other atmospheric exposures. Strategies to inform the public when the pollen count poses a health risk have been proposed along with computerized systems that provide personalized pollen alerts. The best performing public notification system was a "traffic light system" that reported pollen exposure as low, 0-30; intermediate, 31-50; or high, 51-150. This system outperformed other threshold systems used in Sweden and in Britain/Denmark. Continued improvements in pollen forecasting models combined with data provided by automated pollen counters and better public reporting should permit allergic individuals and urban planners to adapt effectively to changes in outdoor aeroallergen exposures.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Cell Count , Pollen/immunology , Climate , Humans , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Severity of Illness IndexSubject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Allergy and Immunology , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Poaceae , Pollen/immunology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , TreesABSTRACT
The first practice parameter on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was published in 2010. This updated practice parameter was prepared 5 years later. In the ensuing years, there has been increased understanding of the pathogenesis of EIB and improved diagnosis of this disorder by using objective testing. At the time of this publication, observations included the following: dry powder mannitol for inhalation as a bronchial provocation test is FDA approved however not currently available in the United States; if baseline pulmonary function test results are normal to near normal (before and after bronchodilator) in a person with suspected EIB, then further testing should be performed by using standardized exercise challenge or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH); and the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions (omega-3 fatty acids) has been challenged. The workgroup preparing this practice parameter updated contemporary practice guidelines based on a current systematic literature review. The group obtained supplementary literature and consensus expert opinions when the published literature was insufficient. A search of the medical literature on PubMed was conducted, and search terms included pathogenesis, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and therapy (both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical) of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction or exercise-induced asthma (which is no longer a preferred term); asthma; and exercise and asthma. References assessed as relevant to the topic were evaluated to search for additional relevant references. Published clinical studies were appraised by category of evidence and used to document the strength of the recommendation. The parameter was then evaluated by Joint Task Force reviewers and then by reviewers assigned by the parent organizations, as well as the general membership. Based on this process, the parameter can be characterized as an evidence- and consensus-based document.
Subject(s)
Asthma, Exercise-Induced , Bronchoconstriction , Asthma, Exercise-Induced/diagnosis , Asthma, Exercise-Induced/epidemiology , Asthma, Exercise-Induced/physiopathology , Asthma, Exercise-Induced/therapy , HumansABSTRACT
A fundamental aspect of climate change is the potential shifts in flowering phenology and pollen initiation associated with milder winters and warmer seasonal air temperature. Earlier floral anthesis has been suggested, in turn, to have a role in human disease by increasing time of exposure to pollen that causes allergic rhinitis and related asthma. However, earlier floral initiation does not necessarily alter the temporal duration of the pollen season, and, to date, no consistent continental trend in pollen season length has been demonstrated. Here we report that duration of the ragweed (Ambrosia spp.) pollen season has been increasing in recent decades as a function of latitude in North America. Latitudinal effects on increasing season length were associated primarily with a delay in first frost of the fall season and lengthening of the frost free period. Overall, these data indicate a significant increase in the length of the ragweed pollen season by as much as 13-27 d at latitudes above ~44°N since 1995. This is consistent with recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections regarding enhanced warming as a function of latitude. If similar warming trends accompany long-term climate change, greater exposure times to seasonal allergens may occur with subsequent effects on public health.
Subject(s)
Ambrosia , Pollen , Seasons , Temperature , Asthma/etiology , Climate , Humans , North America , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/etiologySubject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Administration, Cutaneous , Administration, Oral , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Algorithms , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Calcineurin Inhibitors , Case Management , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Irritant/complications , Dermatitis, Irritant/therapy , Emollients/administration & dosage , Emollients/therapeutic use , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/diet therapy , Humans , Infant , Phototherapy , Skin Diseases, Infectious/drug therapy , Skin Diseases, Infectious/etiologySubject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Pollen , Humans , Meteorological Concepts , Seasons , TemperatureABSTRACT
Many people with allergies monitor daily pollen and spore counts with the belief that they can act on that information to improve their health. Because many factors can affect personal exposure, the value of community-wide counts for an individual is questionable. These factors include the presence of local pollen and spore sources, diurnal variations, weather effects, air pollution, and a particle-free bioaerosol. To take advantage of bioparticulate counts, the public needs to be informed about their meaning and factors that can influence personal exposure.