ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Delirium is a serious condition often experienced by critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). The role of circadian light for this condition is unclear. The aim of this study was to describe incidence of delirium, risk factors for delirium, and the association between delirium and circadian light for patients in the ICU. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients at a Danish ICU from 1 August 2015 to 31 January 2016. Exclusion criteria were heavy sedation, no Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores, or inability to communicate in Danish. Delirium was defined as at least one positive CAM-ICU score or treatment with haloperidol. Three of nine beds at the ICU had a circadian light installation. Allocation to ICU beds with or without circadian light depended on availability at admission. Risk factors for development of delirium were analyzed by simple and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 183 patients in the study. The incidence of delirium was 28% (95% CI 22, 35). Allocation to beds with or without circadian lighting was not associated with delirium incidence (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.55, 2.37; P = 0.73). We found that Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01, 1.06; P = 0.002), and dexmedetomidine was associated with delirium (OR 4.14; 95% CI 1.72, 10.03; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this population of patients admitted to an ICU during 6 months, the incidence of delirium was 28%. We did not find an association between circadian light and development of delirium.
Subject(s)
Delirium/etiology , Intensive Care Units , Phototherapy/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Circadian Rhythm , Confusion/epidemiology , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/prevention & control , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: An imbalance between Th1 and Th2 cells is involved in allergic rhinitis (AR) that may be improved by probiotics. To test the efficacy of the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei LP-33, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was carried out in patients with AR to grass pollen treated with loratadine and presenting altered quality of life. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Subjects with persistent AR, symptomatic during the grass pollen season, and a positive skin test or specific immunoglobulin E to grass pollens were included by general practitioners (GPs). All received loratadine for 5 weeks. The primary end point was the improvement in Rhinitis Quality of Life (RQLQ) global score at the fifth week of LP-33 consumption compared with placebo (in addition to loratadine). Secondary end points included nasal and ocular symptoms (individual and total symptom scores), visual analogue scale and time of first exacerbation of the symptoms when loratadine was stopped. RESULTS: A total of 425 subjects were included. Using intent-to-treat analysis, the RQLQ global score decreased significantly more in the LP-33 group than in the placebo group (P=0.0255, difference=-0.286 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.536; -0.035)). No significant differences were noted for the change of the rhinitis total symptom score 5 global score between groups (P=0.1288, difference=-0.452 (95% CI: -1.036; 0.132)). Significant differences in ocular symptoms (RQLQ) were observed between groups (P=0.0029, difference=-0.4087 (95% CI: -0.6768; -0.1407)). CONCLUSIONS: This study performed by GPs shows that LP-33 improves the quality of life of subjects with persistent AR who are currently being treated with an oral H1-antihistamine. Whereas nasal symptoms had not changed, ocular symptoms had consistently improved.
Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Lactobacillus , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Endpoint Determination , Female , Histamine Antagonists/pharmacology , Humans , Loratadine/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Pollen/adverse effects , Pollen/immunology , Quality of Life , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Seasons , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Parasitic helminths have been shown to reduce inflammation in most experimental models of allergic disease, and this effect is mediated via cytokine responses. However, in humans, the effects of controlled helminth infection on cytokine responses during allergy have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate whether infection with the nematode parasite Trichuris suis alters systemic cytokine levels, cellular cytokine responses to parasite antigens and pollen allergens and/or the cytokine profile of allergic individuals. METHODS: In a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial (UMIN trial registry, Registration no. R000001298, Trial ID UMIN000001070, URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/map/english), adults with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis received three weekly doses of 2500 Trichuris suis ova (n = 45) or placebo (n = 44) over 6 months. IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 and IL-13 were quantified via cytometric bead array in plasma. Cytokines, including active TGF-ß, were also quantified in supernatants from peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultured with parasite antigens or pollen allergens before, during and after the grass pollen season for a sub-cohort of randomized participants (T. suis ova-treated, n = 12, Placebo-treated, n = 10). RESULTS: Helminth infection induced a Th2-polarized cytokine response comprising elevated plasma IL-5 and parasite-specific IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, and a global shift in the profile of systemic cytokine responses. Infection also elicited high levels of the regulatory cytokine IL-10 in response to T. suis antigens. Despite increased production of T. suis-specific cytokines in T. suis ova-treated participants, allergen-specific cytokine responses during the grass pollen season and the global profile of PBMC cytokine responses were not affected by T. suis ova treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that cytokines induced by Trichuris suis ova treatment do not alter allergic reactivity to pollen during the peak of allergic rhinitis symptoms.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Helminth/immunology , Cytokines/metabolism , Ovum/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/therapy , Trichuris/immunology , Adult , Animals , Cytokines/blood , Desensitization, Immunologic , Female , Humans , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Poaceae/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic , Trichuriasis/immunology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Carrot is a frequent cause of food allergy in Europe. The objective of this study was to evaluate a panel of carrot allergens for diagnosis of carrot allergy in Spain, Switzerland and Denmark. METHODS: Forty-nine carrot allergic patients, 71 pollen allergic but carrot-tolerant patients and 63 nonatopic controls were included. Serum IgE to carrot extract, recombinant carrot allergens (rDau c 1.0104; rDau c 1.0201; rDau c 4; the isoflavone reductase-like proteins rDau c IFR 1, rDau c IFR 2; the carrot cyclophilin rDau c Cyc) were analyzed by ImmunoCAP. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the carrot extract-based test was 82%. Use of the recombinant allergens increased the sensitivity to 90%. The Dau c 1 isoforms were major allergens for Swiss and Danish carrot allergic patients, the profilin rDau c 4 for the Spanish patients. The rDau c IFR 1 and rDau c IFR 2 were recognized by 6% and 20% of the carrot allergics, but did not contribute to a further increase of sensitivity. Among pollen allergic controls, 34% had IgE to carrot extract, 18% to each of rDau c 1.0104, rDau c 1.0201 and rDau c 4, 8% to rDau c IFR 1 and 7% to rDau c IFR 2. Sensitization to rDau c Cyc occurred in one carrot allergic patient and one nonatopic control. CONCLUSION: Component-resolved in vitro analyses revealed a significant difference in IgE sensitization pattern between geographical regions and in the prevalence of sensitization to carrot components between carrot allergic and carrot-tolerant but pollen sensitized patients.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Plant , Daucus carota/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Plant Extracts , Adult , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Daucus carota/adverse effects , Europe , Female , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/immunology , Protein Isoforms/immunology , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young AdultSubject(s)
Bandages , Bees , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Sucrose/therapeutic use , Adult , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic skin sensitization (AS) is a risk factor for the development of allergic symptoms. A meticulous definition of this condition requires a systematic assessment of clinical symptoms before inclusion. OBJECTIVE: To examine the concordance between retrospective assessment of seasonal allergic symptoms and prospective seasonal symptom registration among subjects with AS. METHODS: On the basis of a population survey, autumn 2002, including skin prick tests (positive if > or =3 mm) and a screening questionnaire, 87 subjects with AS to birch and/or grass pollen, birch and/or grass pollen allergic symptomatic subjects (n = 63) and healthy controls (n = 40) were included in January to March 2003, completed diary cards on symptom and medication use during the relevant seasons 2003, and were examined at follow up in autumn 2003. Allergy: positive SPT and symptoms > or = seven diary days. RESULTS: Eleven AS subjects (birch: n = 10) subsequently developed allergic symptoms, yet nine admitted, at follow up, to have had symptoms before inclusion, or even denied pollen-related symptoms despite a significant diary. Compared with AS subjects sensitized to grass pollen, AS subjects sensitized to birch pollen had significantly larger skin prick reactions and more often and severe pollen symptoms. CONCLUSION: In the context of double-sensitization, retrospective symptom assessment is not a reliable method for ensuring that subjects classified, as asymptomatically skin sensitized, are truly, asymptomatic. This matter should be considered in studies on allergy development.
Subject(s)
Betula/adverse effects , Poaceae/adverse effects , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Antigens, Plant/adverse effects , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Betula/immunology , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poaceae/immunology , Pollen/adverse effects , Pollen/immunology , Prospective Studies , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/etiology , Skin TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. AIMS: To compare the safety and tolerability of four different sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) regimes in grass pollen allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Thirty subjects sensitized to grass pollen were enrolled and allocated to four groups. Sublingual immunotherapy was administered in tablets daily for 10 days. Groups 1 and 2 received incremental sublingual doses of 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 IR, Group 1 daily and Group 2 increments every second day. Repeated constant dose regimens of 300 IR and 500 IR were administered in Groups 3 and 4 respectively. Safety assessments included adverse events (AE), vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) and clinical laboratory tests. RESULTS: Sublingual immunotherapy 300 IR (Group 3) administered in a constant dose and incremental doses up to 500 IR (Groups 1 and 2) were generally well tolerated. The majority of AEs were mild to moderate, the most common being oral pruritus, throat irritation and swollen tongue. Severe local AEs (swelling of throat) were observed only for Group 4. No serious systemic AEs were reported. There were no relevant changes in clinical laboratory, vital signs and ECG data. CONCLUSION: Adverse events were mostly local (sublingual), were not severe and resolved rapidly. Using a 5-day induction regimen high-dose treatment up to 500 IR could be administered without important side-effects, in contrast to initiating with a constant dose of 500 IR. The data indicate that a short dose increase phase may reduce the incidence of AEs when high-dose SLIT is administered.
Subject(s)
Allergens/administration & dosage , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Poaceae/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/prevention & control , Administration, Sublingual , Adolescent , Adult , Allergens/adverse effects , Allergens/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poaceae/adverse effects , Pollen/adverse effects , Tablets , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Immunotherapy is the only treatment for allergy that has the potential to alter the natural course of the disease. Sublingual immunotherapy for grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis has been developed to make immunotherapy available to a broader group of allergic patients. Here, a safe dose range and the safety during daily sublingual administration were investigated for a new tablet-based sublingual immunotherapy for grass pollen allergy. Simultaneously, immunological changes were monitored. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I trial was undertaken, with stepwise dose-escalation during the dose-finding period, and afterwards with daily dosing 8 weeks prior to and 15 weeks during the grass pollen season (2500, 25000, or 75000 standardized quality tablet [SQ-T] units, or placebo). Fifty-two participants with grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis and a positive skin prick test and specific IgE to Phleum pratense entered the trial. During the daily-dose treatment periods, 67% of the participants reported adverse events. The most frequent were itching in the mouth, eyes, or throat, and rhinitis, and most were mild and resolved within 1 day. Two participants withdrew due to adverse events (sting and blisters in the mouth and itching in the mouth). Time- and dose-dependent increases of P pratense-specific IgG, IgA, IgE, and IgE-competing components were found in serum during the first 8 weeks of daily dosing, indicating that the treatment had a significant allergen-specific effect on the immune system. In conclusion, the grass allergen tablet, administered in a dose of 75000 SQ-T once daily, was well tolerated and displayed systemic immunogenicity.
Subject(s)
Allergens/administration & dosage , Immunotherapy/methods , Poaceae/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Administration, Oral , Administration, Sublingual , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allergens/immunology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Immunoglobulins/immunology , Middle Aged , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Tablets , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic skin sensitization (AS) has been shown to be a risk factor for respiratory allergic disease. CCR4, CXCR1 and CD62L have all been assigned a role in the immunopathogenesis of allergy. Memory T-cell expression of CCR4, CXCR1 and CD62L has not hitherto been investigated in subjects with AS. METHODS: We investigated seasonal CD4 memory T-cell expression of the chemokine receptors CCR4, CXCR1 as well as L-selectin (CD62L) in fresh cultures derived from symptomatic atopics (SAs), subjects with AS and healthy controls (HCs). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from all three groups were isolated during birch and grass pollination as well as in the following winter. CD4 memory T-cell expression of CCR4, CXCR1 and CD62L was determined by flow-cytometry. RESULTS: During spring and summer, a significantly increased proportion of memory T cells expressed CCR4, CXCR1 and CD62L in SAs when compared with subjects with AS and HCs. Only SAs exhibited seasonal fluctuations in numbers of CCR4, CXCR1 and CD62L positive memory T cells. CONCLUSION: Although clearly IgE sensitized, subjects with AS have significant diminished numbers of CCR4, CXCR1 and CD62L positive memory T cells, during pollination, when compared with SAs. In contrast to SAs, cultures derived from subjects with AS did not display seasonal variation. Our findings explain the lack of clinical symptoms, during pollination, in subjects with AS.
Subject(s)
Allergens , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , L-Selectin/metabolism , Pollen , Receptors, Chemokine/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Cytokines/metabolism , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Female , Flow Cytometry , Histamine Release , Humans , Leukocyte Common Antigens/analysis , Male , Receptors, CCR4 , Receptors, Interleukin-8A/metabolism , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Seasons , Skin TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic skin sensitization (AS) has been shown to be a risk factor for respiratory allergic disease. OBJECTIVE: We investigated allergen and recall antigen-driven T cell proliferation, cytokine production and T cell expression of the chemokine receptor CCR4, in cultures derived from symptomatic atopics (SA), subjects with AS and healthy controls (HC). Numbers of allergen-specific precursor T cells in all three groups were also estimated. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from the three groups were isolated and stimulated with allergen and tetanus toxoid. Proliferation, cytokine production and CCR4 expression were measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: A significantly increased proportion of CD4(+) memory T cells proliferated in response to allergen in SA as compared with subjects with AS (P<0.001) and HC (P<0.001). Only in SA was expansion of CD4(+)CCR4(+) T cells, after allergen stimulation observed. SA had higher frequencies of allergen-specific T cells than subjects with AS and HC (P=0.02, for both). With regard to allergen-induced production of T-helper type 1 (Th1) and Th2 cytokines, subjects with AS and HC resembled each other, while differing significantly from SA. CONCLUSION: We conclude, that subjects with AS, although clearly IgE sensitized, have significant diminished numbers of allergen-specific T cells as well as decreased allergen-induced CD4(+) memory T cell proliferation as compared with SA. To a large extent, our findings are capable of explaining the immunological characteristics associated with AS. Our findings may serve as better prognostic markers for subsequent allergic progression, than previously described clinical and paraclinical characteristics.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Skin/immunology , Adult , Betula/immunology , Betulaceae/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , Cytokines/biosynthesis , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Female , Humans , Leukocyte Common Antigens/analysis , Male , Phleum/immunology , Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 1 , Receptors, CCR4 , Receptors, Chemokine/analysis , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Tetanus Toxoid/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of IgG4 during allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is still controversial. The available studies present paramount differences in in vitro techniques, allergens, and clinical outcome parameters. By implementing a sensitive method, and pivotal clinical outcome parameters, we wanted to ascertain the utility of IgG4 as a clinical marker of decreased allergen-specific sensitivity to a common aeroallergen. METHODS: Sera were drawn from 23 birch-pollen-allergic patients during a placebo-controlled clinical trial on birch pollen SIT. Seventeen patients received active treatment. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 2, 4, 7, and 30 treatment weeks, and 36 months. The binding activity of autologous IgG, IgG4, IgE, and IgE- and/or IgG-depleted serum to (125)I-labelled recombinant Bet v 1 was assessed in a fluid-phase radioimmunoassay. Disease severity was assessed subjectively on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and objectively by intradermal late-phase reaction diameters. RESULTS: Before SIT IgG4 fraction of IgG-allergen binding varied from 4 to 74%, with a median of 36%, increasing to 71% after 36 months. Changes in IgG4 or IgG4/IgG fraction were not correlated to clinical outcome parameters. Changes in IgG allergen binding and VAS were significantly correlated (sigma = 0.72; p < 0.05). SIT increased the serum-blocking activity of IgE allergen binding from 25% before SIT to 80% after SIT. No changes were observed in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that IgG4 per se is a poor marker of decreased allergen-specific sensitivity to birch pollen, both as a single measurement and as delta values.
Subject(s)
Betula/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , Humans , Hypersensitivity/blood , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is associated with increased levels of allergen-specific IgG in serum. However, it is not clear to what extent qualitative changes in the allergen binding capacity of IgG may be induced as well. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of SIT on antibody affinity. METHODS: The binding affinity of purified serum IgG1, IgG4 and IgE to the major allergen in birch (Betula verrucosa) pollen, Bet v 1, was analysed by surface plasmon resonance. The antibodies were obtained from 10 birch pollen-allergic patients receiving SIT and from 10 patients with no SIT. RESULTS: The patients having received SIT have a significant higher titre of anti-Bet v 1 antibodies in their blood, but the affinity to Bet v 1 of allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG4 does not differ between the two groups. For IgG1 and IgG4, correlations between less allergic symptoms and affinity of the antibodies were observed both in the SIT group and to a smaller extent in the non-SIT group. CONCLUSION: SIT has no effect on antibody affinity of allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 or IgG4. Allergic patients with high-affinity IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies report less symptoms than patients with low-affinity antibodies.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Antibody Affinity , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Pollen , Adult , Antibodies, Blocking/immunology , Antigens, Plant , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surface Plasmon ResonanceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Both sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy (SLIT) and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) have a documented clinical efficacy, but only few comparative studies have been performed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of SLIT vs SCIT and secondary to compare SLIT and SCIT with placebo and to evaluate the relative clinical efficacy in relation to systemic side-effects. METHODS: A 3-year randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy study including 71 adult birch pollen hay fever patients treated for two consecutive years after a baseline year. Allocation to treatment groups was based on disease severity in the baseline season, gender and age. RESULTS: Clinical efficacy was estimated in 58 patients completing the first treatment year by subtracting baseline data and by calculating the ratio first treatment season vs baseline. SLIT diminished the median disease severity to one-half and SCIT to one-third of placebo treatment. No statistical significant difference between the two groups was observed. Both for symptoms and medication scores actively treated patients showed statistically significant and clinical relevant efficacy compared with placebo. SLIT treatment only resulted in local mild side-effects, while SCIT resulted in few serious systemic side-effects. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited number of patients the clinical efficacy of SLIT was not statistically different from SCIT, and both treatments are clinically effective compared with placebo in the treatment of birch pollen rhinoconjunctivitis. The lack of significant difference between the two treatments does not indicate equivalent efficacy, but to detect minor differences necessitates investigation of larger groups. Due to the advantageous safety profile SLIT may be favored.
Subject(s)
Betula/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Administration, Sublingual , Adult , Allergens/immunology , Allergens/pharmacology , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Middle Aged , Probability , Reference Values , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/etiology , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Long-term reproducibility of the skin-prick test (SPT) has been questioned. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical relevance of SPT changes. METHODS: SPT to 10 common inhalation allergens was performed annually from 1999 to 2001 in 25 nonsensitized and 21 sensitized subjects. An SPT was positive when > or =3 mm, and repeatable if either persistently positive or negative. Clinical sensitivity to birch pollen was used as model for inhalation allergy, and was investigated at inclusion and at study termination by challenge tests, intradermal test, titrated SPT and IgE measurements. Birch pollen symptoms were confirmed in diaries. RESULTS: The repeatability of a positive SPT was 67%, increasing significantly to 100% when supported by the history. When not supported by history, the presence of specific IgE was significantly associated with a repeatable SPT. Allergen sensitivity was significantly lower in subjects loosing SPT positivity. The repeatability of a negative test was 95%, decreasing significantly to 87% by the presence of other sensitization. Development of a positive SPT was clinically relevant. Elevation of SPT cut-off point did not enhance repeatability. CONCLUSION: SPT changes are clinically relevant. Further studies using other allergens are needed. Long-term repeatability of SPT is high in the presence of a supportive history.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Skin Tests , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Pollen/immunology , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allergy to hazelnuts is a common example of birch pollen related food allergy. Symptoms upon ingestion are often confined to the mouth and throat, but severe systemic reactions have been described in some patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the reduction in allergenicity by roasting of the nuts. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) with roasted hazelnuts (140 degrees C, 40 min) were performed in 17 birch pollen allergic patients with DBPCFC-confirmed food allergy to raw hazelnuts. The effect of roasting was further evaluated by skin prick test (SPT), histamine release (HR), measurement of specific IgE, and IgE-inhibition experiments. RESULTS: In 5/17 patients the DBPCFC with the roasted nuts were positive. The symptoms were generally mild and included OAS (oral allergy syndrome) in all patients. Roasting of the nuts significantly reduced the allergenic activity evaluated by SPT, HR, specific IgE, and IgE-inhibition. Immunoblotting experiments with recombinant hazelnut allergens showed sensitization against Cor a 1.04 in 16/17 patients and against Cor a 2 in 7/17 patients. None of the patients were sensitized to Cor a 8. Challenge-positive patients did not differ from the rest in IgE-binding pattern. CONCLUSIONS: All the applied methods indicated that roasting of hazelnuts reduces the allergenicity, but since 5/17 birch pollen allergic patients were DBPCFC-positive to the roasted nuts, ingestion of roasted hazelnuts or products containing roasted hazelnuts can not be considered safe for a number of hazelnut allergic consumers. For patients with a history of severe allergic symptoms upon ingestion of hazelnuts, thorough and conscientious food labelling of hazelnuts and hazelnut residues is essential.
Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Corylus/adverse effects , Nut Hypersensitivity/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allergens/administration & dosage , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic , Cooking/methods , Denmark , Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Histamine Release/immunology , Humans , Immunoblotting , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Pollen/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Tests , Switzerland , SyndromeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: New foods may present a risk for food hypersensitive patients. Several examples exist of allergic reactions caused by cross-reactive plant-derived foods, and new foods should be scrutinised before introducing them to the market. We have evaluated the clinical and serological relevance of cross-reactivity between Nangai and pollen allergens. METHODS: Cross-reactivity was examined with Maxisorp RAST (radioallergosorbent test), RAST inhibition and Western blot, using sera from patients allergic to grass, birch and mugwort pollen. None of the patients reported having seen or eaten Nangai previously. To determine the biological and clinical relevance of the cross-reactivity, histamine release (HR) test, skin prick test (SPT) and food challenge were used. RESULTS: There was prevalence for reactivity against Nangai in the group of pollen allergic patients. This cross-reactivity seems to be related--at least in part--to carbohydrate epitopes. Three out of 12 patients tested with Nangai were positive upon open challenge, but using double blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) this could not be confirmed in two patients. The biological effects of Nangai on allergic patients were confirmed using HR and SPT. CONCLUSION: The Nangai specific IgE found among pollen allergic patients addresses the need for control of new or changed foods before introduction to the market.
Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Cross Reactions/immunology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/etiology , Nut Hypersensitivity/etiology , Nuts/adverse effects , Pollen/adverse effects , Allergens/administration & dosage , Animals , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Antigens, Differentiation/analysis , Antigens, Differentiation/immunology , Binding, Competitive/immunology , Cats , Dogs , Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic , Double-Blind Method , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , Galectin 3 , Histamine Release/immunology , Humans , Immunoblotting , Immunodominant Epitopes/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Radioallergosorbent Test , Sensitivity and Specificity , Skin TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is only very limited documentation of the efficacy and safety of high-dose subcutaneous birch pollen immunotherapy (IT) in double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) studies. Birch pollen is a major cause of allergic morbidity in northern Europe and in eastern parts of North America. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with severe rhinoconjunctivitis (hay fever) to birch pollen were allocated to double-blinded clustered IT with a depot birch pollen extract (Betula verrucosa) or placebo injections. Seven patients in each group had concomitant self-reported seasonal asthma. Treatment was conducted as a clustered regimen and was performed in a specialist unit. Symptom scores from nose, eyes, and lungs, and use of oral and topical antihistamines, beta-2-agonists, and oral corticosteroids were recorded daily during the season of 2000. Sensitivity to allergen provocation in skin, conjunctiva, and nasal mucosa was measured before and after 10 months of treatment. Post-seasonal assessment of symptom severity was performed using a simple questionnaire. RESULTS: IT reduced the symptom score for both rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma (P-values < 0.05), total medication score (P < 0.02) and use of oral antihistamines (P < 0.01). IT reduced specific conjunctival sensitivity (P < 0.05), skin prick test, and especially cutaneous late-phase response diameters (P < 0.00001), and increased general well-being on post-seasonal evaluation (P < 0.01). IT was safe, with side-effects at the same level as placebo. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose, subcutaneous IT is efficacious and safe in patients with severe birch pollen rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Allergens/therapeutic use , Betula/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic , Phytotherapy , Pollen/immunology , Adult , Allergens/adverse effects , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Betula/adverse effects , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/etiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/psychology , Pollen/adverse effects , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/etiology , Seasons , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to produce the Bet v 1-related major hazelnut allergen Cor a 1.0401 and variants thereof as recombinant allergens, and to compare their immuno-reactivity with the major hazel pollen allergen using sera of patients whose hazelnut allergy recently was confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) in a multicenter study. Total RNA was isolated from immature hazelnuts and transcribed into cDNA. Full length coding DNA obtained by PCR-strategy was subcloned into pTYB11 vector and expressed in E. coli ER2566 cells. Native non-fusion target proteins were purified by DTT-induced self-cleavage of the intein-tagged N-terminal fusion proteins. IgE reactivity of the recombinant allergens was tested by enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST), EAST-inhibition, immunoblot-inhibition and histamine release assays. Four recombinant allergens were produced showing deduced amino acid sequence identities among each other of 97-99%, and were considered as variants Cor a 1.0401 (GenBank Accession no.: AF136945), Cor a 1.0402 (AF323973), Cor a 1.0403 (AF323974) and Cor a 1.0404 (AF323975). Cor a 1.0402 and 03 only differed in a C4S exchange. Cor a 1.0404 had a unique proline residue in position 99. Surprisingly, only 63% identity was revealed with hazel pollen Cor a 1. EAST with 43 sera of patients with positive DBPCFC to hazelnut indicated IgE reactivity to Cor a 1.0401 in 95% of the sera, to Cor a 1.0402 in 93%, to Cor a 1.0403 in 91%, and in only 74% of the sera to the proline variant Cor a 1.0404. The allergenic activity of the four variants was confirmed by histamine release assays in 15 hazelnut-allergic patients stimulated with the four variants and controls. Eleven sera were positive with extract from native hazelnut, 13 with rCor a 1.0401, 12 with rCor a 1.0402, 11 with rCor a 1.0403, and only two with rCor a 1.0404 containing the proline exchange. The high IgE binding variant Cor a 1.0401 showed only partial IgE cross-reactivity with pollen Cor a 1. IgE-binding and histamine release capacity led to a concordant ranking of the allergenic activity of the recombinant variants: Cor a 1.0401>Cor a 1.0402 and 03>Cor a 1.0404 (the proline variant). Similar results for Cor a 1.0402 and 03 suggest a minor influence in IgE binding of cysteine in position 4, whereas proline in position 99 appears to be responsible for the decrease in IgE reactivity in Cor a 1.0404. It appears that the epitopes of hazelnut Cor a 1.04 are less related to pollen Cor a 1 than to Bet v 1 from birch pollen. Low IgE binding variants or mutants of Cor a 1.04 are candidate compounds for developing a novel and safe approach of specific immunotherapy of hazelnut allergy.
Subject(s)
Allergens , Nut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Plant Proteins/genetics , Plant Proteins/immunology , Pollen , Amino Acid Sequence , Cloning, Molecular , DNA, Complementary/genetics , DNA, Complementary/isolation & purification , Double-Blind Method , Escherichia coli , Humans , Immunodominant Epitopes/genetics , Immunodominant Epitopes/immunology , Molecular Sequence Data , Nut Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Sequence Alignment , Seroepidemiologic StudiesABSTRACT
Many asthma patients seek alternative or adjunctive therapies. One such modality is reflexology, whereby finger pressure is applied to certain parts of the body. The aim of the study was to examine the popular claim that reflexology treatment benefits bronchial asthma. Ten weeks of active or simulated (placebo) reflexology given by an experienced reflexologist, were compared in an otherwise blind, controlled trial of 20+20 outpatients with asthma. Objective lung function tests (peak flow morning and evening, and weekly spirometry at the clinic) did not change. Subjective scores (describing symptoms, beta2-inhalations and quality of life) and also bronchial sensitivity to histamine improved on both regimens, but no differences were found between groups receiving active or placebo reflexology. However, a trend in favour of reflexology became significant when a supplementary analysis of symptom diaries was carried out. It was accompanied by a significant pattern compatible with subconscious unblinding, in that patients tended to guess which treatment they had been receiving. No evidence was found that reflexology has a specific effect on asthma beyond placebo influence.
Subject(s)
Asthma/rehabilitation , Massage/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma/physiopathology , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Double-Blind Method , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peak Expiratory Flow Rate , Quality of Life , Regression Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to develop and evaluate different methods of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with apple. Three different DBPCFC models were evaluated: fresh apple juice, freshly grated apple, and freeze-dried apple powder. All challenges were performed outside the pollen season and took place from 1997 to 1999. The freeze-dried apple material was characterized by means of leukocyte histamine release (HR), skin prick test (SPT), and immunoblotting experiments. The study population consisted of birch pollen-allergic patients with a history of rhinitis in the birch-pollen season and positive specific IgE to birch. For comparison of the DBPCFC models, 65 patients with a positive open oral challenge with apple were selected. In the characterization of the freeze-dried apple material, 46 birch pollen-allergic patients were included. The IgE reactivity to apple was evaluated by measurement of specific IgE, HR, and SPT. Golden Delicious apples were used in all experiments. The results of this study showed that it was possible to perform DBPCFC with apple in birch pollen-allergic individuals. The model with freshly squeezed apple juice had a low sensitivity and displayed a high frequency of reactions to placebo, probably due to the ingredients used for blinding. The sensitivity of the models with freshly grated apple and freeze-dried apple powder was 0.74/0.60. An increase in sensitivity is desirable. The freeze-dried apple powder proved to be useful for SPT, HR, and oral challenges, but further investigation of the stability and the allergenic profile of the material is needed.