Management of an LCHADD Patient During Pregnancy and High Intensity Exercise.

In this report we describe a female Long-Chain 3-Hydroxyacyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency (LCHADD) patient who suffered from severe exercise intolerance. At age 34, the patient became pregnant for the first time. After an uneventful first 32 weeks of pregnancy she developed sinus tachycardia (resting heart rate 120-134 bpm) and lactate and creatinine kinase levels increased (3.3 mmol/L and 264 U/L, respectively). Increasing MCT supplementation (dose and frequency of administration) lowered heart rate and improved biochemical parameters. At 34 weeks the heart rate rose again and it was decided to deliver the child by caesarean section. Postpartum both mother and child did well.Prior to pregnancy, she performed exercise tests with different doses of medium chain triglycerides (MCTs) to establish a safe and effective exercise program (baseline test, second test with 10 g MCTs and third test with 20 g of MCTs). In the MCT supplemented tests the maximal power output was 23% (second test) and 26% (third test) higher, while cardiac output at maximal power output was the same in all three tests (~15.8 L/min).In conclusion, this is the first report of pregnancy in an LCHADD patient, with favourable outcome for both mother and child. Moreover, in the same patient, MCT supplementation improved cardiac performance and metabolic parameters during high intensity exercise. Using impedance cardiography, we got a clear indication that this benefit was due to improved muscle energy generation at high intensity exercise, since at the same cardiac output a higher power output could be generated.

Protein hydrolysate co-ingestion does not modulate 24 h glycemic control in long-standing type 2 diabetes patients.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy of protein hydrolysate co-ingestion as a dietary strategy to improve blood glucose homeostasis under free-living conditions in long-standing type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: A total of 13 type 2 diabetes patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind cross-over design and studied on two occasions for 40 h under strict dietary standardization but otherwise normal, free-living conditions. In one trial, subjects ingested a protein hydrolysate (0.4 g kg(-1) bw casein hydrolysate, PRO) with every main meal. In the other trial, a placebo was ingested (PLA). Blood glucose concentrations were assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: Average 24 h glucose concentrations were similar between the PLA and the PRO trials (8.9 +/- 0.8 vs 9.2 +/- 0.7 mmol l(-1), respectively). Hyperglycemia (glucose concentrations >10 mmol l(-1)) was experienced 34 +/- 9% of the time (8 +/- 2 h per 24 h) in the PLA trial. Protein hydrolysate co-ingestion with each main meal (PRO) did not reduce the prevalence of hyperglycemia (39 +/- 10%, 9 +/- 2 h per 24 h; P=0.2). CONCLUSION: Co-ingestion of a protein hydrolysate with each main meal does not improve glucose homeostasis over a 24 h period in long-standing type 2 diabetes patients.

Brisk walking compared with an individualised medical fitness programme for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Structured exercise is considered a cornerstone in type 2 diabetes treatment. However, adherence to combined resistance and endurance type exercise or medical fitness intervention programmes is generally poor. Group-based brisk walking may represent an attractive alternative, but its long-term efficacy as compared with an individualised approach such as medical fitness intervention programmes is unknown. We compared the clinical benefits of a 12-month exercise intervention programme consisting of either brisk walking or a medical fitness programme in type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: We randomised 92 type 2 diabetes patients (60 +/- 9 years old) to either three times a week of 60 min brisk walking (n = 49) or medical fitness programme (n = 43). Primary outcome was the difference in changes in HbA1c values at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were differences in changes in blood pressure, plasma lipid concentrations, insulin sensitivity, body composition, physical fitness, programme adherence rate and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: After 12 months, 18 brisk walking and 19 medical fitness participants were still actively participating. In both programmes, 50 and 25% of the dropout was attributed to overuse injuries and lack of motivation, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses showed no important differences between brisk walking and medical fitness programme in primary or secondary outcome variables. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The prescription of group-based brisk walking represents an equally effective intervention to modulate glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk profile in type 2 diabetes patients when compared with more individualised medical fitness programmes. Future exercise intervention programmes should anticipate the high attrition rate due to overuse injuries and motivation problems.