Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(1)2021 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33443177

ABSTRACT

Humans reached the Mariana Islands in the western Pacific by ∼3,500 y ago, contemporaneous with or even earlier than the initial peopling of Polynesia. They crossed more than 2,000 km of open ocean to get there, whereas voyages of similar length did not occur anywhere else until more than 2,000 y later. Yet, the settlement of Polynesia has received far more attention than the settlement of the Marianas. There is uncertainty over both the origin of the first colonizers of the Marianas (with different lines of evidence suggesting variously the Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea, or the Bismarck Archipelago) as well as what, if any, relationship they might have had with the first colonizers of Polynesia. To address these questions, we obtained ancient DNA data from two skeletons from the Ritidian Beach Cave Site in northern Guam, dating to ∼2,200 y ago. Analyses of complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences and genome-wide SNP data strongly support ancestry from the Philippines, in agreement with some interpretations of the linguistic and archaeological evidence, but in contradiction to results based on computer simulations of sea voyaging. We also find a close link between the ancient Guam skeletons and early Lapita individuals from Vanuatu and Tonga, suggesting that the Marianas and Polynesia were colonized from the same source population, and raising the possibility that the Marianas played a role in the eventual settlement of Polynesia.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics , DNA, Ancient/analysis , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Human Migration/history , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/genetics , Archaeology , Computer Simulation , Genome , Guam , Haplotypes , History, Ancient , Humans , Indonesia , Micronesia , New Guinea , Philippines , Phylogeny , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Polynesia , Vanuatu
2.
Nature ; 538(7624): 207-214, 2016 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27654914

ABSTRACT

The population history of Aboriginal Australians remains largely uncharacterized. Here we generate high-coverage genomes for 83 Aboriginal Australians (speakers of Pama-Nyungan languages) and 25 Papuans from the New Guinea Highlands. We find that Papuan and Aboriginal Australian ancestors diversified 25-40 thousand years ago (kya), suggesting pre-Holocene population structure in the ancient continent of Sahul (Australia, New Guinea and Tasmania). However, all of the studied Aboriginal Australians descend from a single founding population that differentiated ~10-32 kya. We infer a population expansion in northeast Australia during the Holocene epoch (past 10,000 years) associated with limited gene flow from this region to the rest of Australia, consistent with the spread of the Pama-Nyungan languages. We estimate that Aboriginal Australians and Papuans diverged from Eurasians 51-72 kya, following a single out-of-Africa dispersal, and subsequently admixed with archaic populations. Finally, we report evidence of selection in Aboriginal Australians potentially associated with living in the desert.


Subject(s)
Genome, Human/genetics , Genomics , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/genetics , Phylogeny , Racial Groups/genetics , Africa/ethnology , Australia , Datasets as Topic , Desert Climate , Gene Flow , Genetics, Population , History, Ancient , Human Migration/history , Humans , Language , New Guinea , Population Dynamics , Tasmania
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL