Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Hear Res ; 299: 79-87, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23396271

ABSTRACT

The present study investigates the most important factors that limit the intelligibility of the cochlear implant (CI) processed speech in noisy environments. The electrical stimulation sequences provided in CIs are affected by the noise in the following three manners. First of all, the natural gaps in the speech are filled, which distorts the low-frequency ON/OFF modulations of the speech signal. Secondly, speech envelopes are distorted to include modulations of both speech and noise. Lastly, the N-of-M type of speech coding strategies may select the noise dominated channels instead of the dominant speech channels at low signal-to-noise ratio's (SNRs). Different stimulation sequences are tested with CI subjects to study how these three noise effects individually limit the intelligibility of the CI processed speech. Tests are also conducted with normal hearing (NH) subjects using vocoded speech to identify any significant differences in the noise reduction requirements and speech distortion limitations between the two subject groups. Results indicate that compared to NH subjects CI subjects can tolerate significantly lower levels of steady state speech shaped noise in the speech gaps but at the same time can tolerate comparable levels of distortions in the speech segments. Furthermore, modulations in the stimulus current level have no effect on speech intelligibility as long as the channel selection remains ideal. Finally, wrong maxima selection together with the introduction of noise in the speech gaps significantly degrades the intelligibility. At low SNRs wrong maxima selection introduces interruptions in the speech and makes it difficult to fuse noisy and interrupted speech signals into a coherent speech stream.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Noise/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Auditory Threshold , Case-Control Studies , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Comprehension , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Sound Spectrography , Speech Reception Threshold Test , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL