Managing folate deficiency implies filling the gap between laboratory and clinical assessment.

The characterization of folate status in subjects at risk of deficiency and with altered vitamin homeostasis is crucial to endorse preventive intervention health policies, especially in developed countries. Several physiological changes (i.e. pregnancy), clinical situations and diseases have been associated to increased requirement, impaired intake and absorption of folate. However clinical practice guidelines (CPG) endorse folic acid supplementation generally discarding the use of its determination in serum to assess the risk of deficiency and/or its concentration at baseline. Poor confidence on the diagnostic accuracy of serum folate assays still persists in the current CPGs although recent standardization efforts have greatly improved inter-method variability and precision. In this review we critically appraise the methodological issues concerning laboratory folate determination and the evidence on the potential adverse effects of folic acid exposure. The final aim is to build a sound background to promote serum folate-based cost-effective health care policies by optimizing folic acid supplementation in subjects at risk of deficiency and with altered folate homeostasis. Our first result was to adjust in relation to current serum folate assays the thresholds reported by CPGs as index of folate status, defined on the association with metabolic and hematologic indicators. We identify a statistically significant difference between the estimated thresholds and accordingly show that the assessment of folate status actually changes in relation to the assay employed. The use of the method-dependent thresholds here reported may pragmatically endorse the stewardship of folic acid supplementation in clinical practice and increase the cost-effectiveness of health care policies.

On the Policy of the Italian Government in the Discovery, Development, and Access to Medicines.

This commentary outlines how discovery, development, and access to medicines are regulated and promoted in Italy by the government through the Ministry of University and Research, the Ministry of Health, and the Italian Medicines Agency. We describe and comment on the existing research programs stimulating preclinical, translational, and clinical research and how access to medicines and their pricing is regulated by Italy's National Health Service both at the national and regional levels. Finally, we describe the current scenario of industrial research and medicines manufacturing. The resulting picture shows a country in which high-level competitive research on medicines is promoted alongside an excellent national health system working toward fairness of access to health care services for all citizens and fiscal solidarity as a fundamental form of system financing. Critical challenges still exist, including the relative scarcity of public funding for research and the non-uniform access to the benefits of the National Health Service across Italian regions.