Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(6): e053572, 2022 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35710235

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether it was feasible to conduct a full trial comparing a tailored versus a standardised exercise programme for patients with shoulder subacromial pain. DESIGN: Two-arm, patient-blinded and assessor-blinded, randomised controlled feasibility trial. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants with shoulder subacromial pain were randomly allocated into one of two intervention groups-tailored or standardised exercise. Participants in the tailored exercise programme received exercises and manual therapy tailored to their scapular and shoulder movement impairments. Participants in the standardised exercise programme received progressive strengthening exercise. The primary outcome measures were (1) the participant recruitment rate; (2) the proportion of participants enrolled from the total number screened; (3) drop-out rates; and (4) adherence to the rehabilitation programme. Other outcome measures were: (5) pain levels; (6) Patient-Specific Functional Scale; (7) the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; and (8) pain self-efficacy. We compared changes in pain and disability scores between groups using a repeated mixed-model analysis of variance. Since this is a feasibility study, we did not adjust alpha for multiple comparisons, and considered 75% CI as the probability threshold at 3-month follow-up. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form 12 and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated. RESULTS: The recruitment rate was 3 participants per month, the proportion of participants enrolled was 23%, the drop-out rate was 14% and the overall adherence to the rehabilitation programme was 85%. No between-group differences were found for most outcome measures. Adverse events (n=2, only in the tailored group) were minor in nature and included skin injury or pain following taping. CONCLUSIONS: Our feasibility trial showed that additional strategies are required for improving recruitment, enrolment and minimising drop-out of participants into the trial and making it feasible to conduct a full trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR: 12617001405303.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Manipulations , Shoulder Pain , Exercise Therapy/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Quality of Life , Shoulder
2.
BMJ Open ; 11(2): e044462, 2021 02 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33593786

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To review the reporting of monitoring and implementation of interventions in a selection of trials that assessed the effectiveness of manual therapy and exercise in the management of shoulder subacromial pain. DESIGN: A review of trials assessing the effectiveness of manual therapy and exercise in the management of patients with shoulder subacromial pain. METHODS: We included in our review a selection of 10 trials that were included in a Cochrane review and compared manual therapy and exercise intervention with another intervention. Trials were assessed independently by two reviewers using two checklists: the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and the Health Behavior Change Consortium treatment fidelity (National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium/NIHBCC). RESULTS: TIDieR overall scores for individual trials ranged from 11.1% to 45% and fidelity scores ranged from 7% to 50%. On average, trials scored the following within each domain of NIHBCC: study design 51%; training of providers 8%; treatment delivery 15%; treatment receipt 14% and treatment enactment 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Little information about the monitoring, implementation and reporting of interventions was provided by trials and that is a barrier for implementing or replicating these interventions. The lack of information regarding the implementation of interventions needs to be taken into account when assessing whether effectiveness of interventions was impacted by their design or due to deviations from the protocol within trials.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Manipulations , Shoulder , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise Therapy , Humans , Shoulder Pain/therapy
3.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 43(8): 832-844, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32723669

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to investigate the effect of inferior shoulder mobilization on scapular and shoulder muscle activity during resisted shoulder abduction in asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: This was a lab-based, repeated-measures, crossover, randomized controlled study. Twenty-two participants were recruited. The order of experimental conditions was randomized. Each participant performed 5 repetitions of resisted shoulder abduction before and after the control and mobilization (grade +IV inferior shoulder mobilization, 3 sets, 60 seconds) conditions. Surface electromyography recorded the muscle activity of anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid; supraspinatus; infraspinatus; upper and lower trapezius; serratus anterior; and latissimus dorsi muscles. RESULTS: Muscle activity levels reduced for infraspinatus (11.3% MVIC, 95% CI: 1.7-20.8), middle (22.4% MVIC, 95% CI: 15.9-28.8) and posterior deltoid (8.7 % MVIC, 95% CI: 4.6-12.9), and serratus anterior (-28.1% MVIC, 95% CI: 15.6-40.8) muscles after the mobilization condition during the eccentric phase of shoulder abduction. No carryover effects were observed, and within-session reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient scores ranging from 0.94 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that inferior glenohumeral mobilization reduces activity levels of some scapular and shoulder muscles. Given the exploratory nature of our study, changes in muscle activity levels may have been found by chance. Confirmatory studies are required.


Subject(s)
Movement , Muscle Contraction , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Resistance Training , Scapula/physiology , Shoulder Joint/physiology , Shoulder/physiology , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Deltoid Muscle/physiology , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Intermediate Back Muscles/physiology , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Rotator Cuff/physiology , Superficial Back Muscles/physiology , Young Adult
4.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol ; 77(3): 666-79, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21635276

ABSTRACT

Knowledge of the bacterial community structure in sediments is essential to better design restoration strategies for eutrophied lakes. In this regard, the aim of this study was to quantify the abundance and activity of bacteria involved in nutrient and iron cycling in sediments from four Azorean lakes with distinct trophic states (Verde, Azul, Furnas and Fogo). Inferred from quantitative PCR, bacteria performing anaerobic ammonia oxidation were the most abundant in the eutrophic lakes Verde, Azul and Furnas (4.5-16.6%), followed by nitrifying bacteria (0.8-13.0%), denitrifying bacteria (DNB) (0.5-6.8%), iron-reducing bacteria (0.2-1.4%) and phosphorus-accumulating organisms (<0.3%). In contrast, DNB dominated sediments from the oligo-mesotrophic lake Fogo (8.8%). Activity assays suggested that bacteria performing ammonia oxidation (aerobic and anaerobic), nitrite oxidation, heterothrophic nitrate reduction, iron reduction and biological phosphorus storage/release were present and active in all Azorean lake sediments. The present work also suggested that the activity of DNB might contribute to the release of phosphorus from sediments.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/metabolism , Fresh Water/microbiology , Geologic Sediments/microbiology , Iron/metabolism , Ammonia/metabolism , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Denitrification , Eutrophication , Fresh Water/analysis , Geologic Sediments/analysis , Iron/analysis , Molecular Sequence Data , Nitrates/metabolism , Oxidation-Reduction , Phosphorus/analysis , Phosphorus/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL