ABSTRACT
Religious beliefs can lead to difficulties in psychiatric diagnosis, when it comes to distinguishing between faith and delusion. Delusion is defined as a false assessment of reality combined with subjective certainty, which is in contrast with the reality of the social environment. The problem with this definition is that reality cannot be examined with scientific methods/criteria and that the assessment of reality itself underlies historical and cultural fluctuations. The current diagnostic manuals for psychiatric disorders DSM 5 and ICD-10 require, that the content of the belief has to be inadequate even in the subculture of the patient (ICD-10) and that the cultural and socioeconomic background of the patient has to be taken into account (DSM 5). On the basis of this case-report and of selected publications on this topic we want to discuss this diagnostic problem. After that we present a diagnostic model for delusion, which is easy to handle in the daily routine of psychiatrists.
Subject(s)
Catholicism/psychology , Delusions/diagnosis , Delusions/psychology , Religion and Psychology , Religion , Spirituality , Adult , Austria , Commitment of Mentally Ill , Cultural Characteristics , Delusions/therapy , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Psychotherapy , Reality Testing , Social Environment , Socioeconomic Factors , Spirit Possession , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Music therapy (MT) has been shown to be efficacious for mental health care clients with various disorders such as schizophrenia, depression and substance abuse. Referral to MT in clinical practice is often based on other factors than diagnosis. We aimed to examine the effectiveness of resource-oriented MT for mental health care clients with low motivation for other therapies. METHOD: This was a pragmatic parallel trial. In specialised centres in Norway, Austria and Australia, 144 adults with non-organic mental disorders and low therapy motivation were randomised to 3 months of biweekly individual, resource-oriented MT plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. TAU was typically intensive (71% were inpatients) and included the best combination of therapies available for each participant, excluding MT. Blinded assessments of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and 15 secondary outcomes were collected before randomisation and after 1, 3 and 9 months. Changes were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis using generalised estimating equations in longitudinal linear models, controlling for diagnosis, site and time point. RESULTS: MT was superior to TAU for total negative symptoms (SANS, d = 0.54, p < 0.001) as well as functioning, clinical global impressions, social avoidance through music, and vitality (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Individual MT as conducted in routine practice is an effective addition to usual care for mental health care clients with low motivation.