Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2020: 8546037, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32110164

ABSTRACT

Bowel preparation traditionally refers to the removal of bowel contents via mechanical cleansing measures. Although it has been a common practice for more than 70 years, its use is based mostly on expert opinion rather than solid evidence. Mechanical bowel preparation in minimally invasive and vaginal gynecologic surgery is strongly debated, since many studies have not confirmed its effectiveness, neither in reducing postoperative infectious morbidity nor in improving surgeons' performance. A comprehensive search of Medline/PubMed and the Cochrane Library Database was conducted, for related articles up to June 2019, including terms such as "mechanical bowel preparation," "vaginal surgery," "minimally invasive," and "gynecology." We aimed to determine the best practice regarding bowel preparation before these surgical approaches. In previous studies, bowel preparation was evaluated only via mechanical measures. The identified randomized trials in laparoscopic approach and in vaginal surgery were 8 and 4, respectively. Most of them compare different types of preparation, with patients being separated into groups of oral laxatives, rectal measures (enema), low residue diet, and fasting. The outcomes of interest are the quality of the surgical field, postoperative infectious complications, length of hospital stay, and patients' comfort during the whole procedure. The results are almost identical regardless of the procedure's type. Routine administration of bowel preparation seems to offer no advantage to any of the objectives mentioned above. Taking into consideration the fact that in most gynecologic cases there is minimal probability of bowel intraluminal entry and, thus, low surgical site infection rates, most scientific societies have issued guidelines against the use of any bowel preparation regimen before laparoscopic or vaginal surgery. Nonetheless, surgeons still do not use a specific pattern and continue ordering them. However, according to recent evidence, preoperative bowel preparation of any type should be omitted prior to minimally invasive and vaginal gynecologic surgeries.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Preoperative Care , Vagina/surgery , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Patient Outcome Assessment , Preoperative Care/methods
2.
J BUON ; 23(7): 19-23, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30722107

ABSTRACT

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in women and often is diagnosed at an advanced stage with diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis. Since it is mainly confined to the peritoneal cavity, even after recurrence, it is an ideal target for loco-regional therapy. The standard therapeutic strategy of advanced ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery followed by systemic chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy used as adjuvant therapy has shown a survival benefit in ovarian cancer. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has several advantages over simple intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This has prompted the use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by HIPEC in the management of ovarian cancer as a part of first and second line treatment for recurrent disease.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion/mortality , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/mortality , Hyperthermia, Induced/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Management , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate
3.
Oncology ; 75(1-2): 42-8, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18728371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) is a rare gynecologic malignancy with very few data existing on the activity of the combination of paclitaxel with a platinum analogue as adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients with PFTC who were treated postoperatively with paclitaxel- and platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. RESULTS: We observed 12 (63.2%) complete and 6 (31.6%) partial responses among 19 patients with measurable disease. The median time to disease progression (TTP) for all patients was 68 months. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients has not been reached yet. The median TTP was 84 months for patients with stage I/II disease and 34 months for patients with advanced disease (p = 0.017). Median OS has not been reached yet for patients with stage I/II PFTC, while it was 63.8 months for patients with stage III/IV disease (p = 0.002). Furthermore, OS has not been reached yet for patients with optimally debulked tumors, while it was 34.1 months for patients with residual disease >2 cm (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant platinum- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy should be regarded as the standard treatment in patients with PFTC. Early stage disease and optimal debulking are associated with improved TTP and OS.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/pathology , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Platinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL