ABSTRACT
When using EMG biofeedback to control the grasping force of a myoelectric prosthesis, subjects need to activate their muscles and maintain the myoelectric signal within an appropriate interval. However, their performance decreases for higher forces, because the myoelectric signal is more variable for stronger contractions. Therefore, the present study proposes to implement EMG biofeedback using nonlinear mapping, in which EMG intervals of increasing size are mapped to equal-sized intervals of the prosthesis velocity. To validate this approach, 20 non-disabled subjects performed force-matching tasks using Michelangelo prosthesis with and without EMG biofeedback with linear and nonlinear mapping. Additionally, four transradial amputees performed a functional task in the same feedback and mapping conditions. The success rate in producing desired force was significantly higher with feedback (65.4±15.9%) compared to no feedback (46.2±14.9%) as well as when using nonlinear (62.4±16.8%) versus linear mapping (49.2±17.2%). Overall, in non-disabled subjects, the highest success rate was obtained when EMG biofeedback was combined with nonlinear mapping (72%), and the opposite for linear mapping with no feedback (39.6%). The same trend was registered also in four amputee subjects. Therefore, EMG biofeedback improved prosthesis force control, especially when combined with nonlinear mapping, which showed to be an effective approach to counteract increasing variability of myoelectric signal for stronger contractions.
Subject(s)
Amputees , Artificial Limbs , Touch Perception , Humans , Electromyography , Biofeedback, Psychology , Prosthesis DesignABSTRACT
This pilot study reports the development of a novel closed-loop (CL) FES-gait control system, which employed a finite-state controller that processed kinematic feedback from four miniaturized motion sensors. This strategy automated the control of knee extension via quadriceps and gluteus stimulation during the stance phase of gait on the supporting leg, and managed the stimulation delivered to the common peroneal nerve (CPN) during swing-phase on the contra-lateral limb. The control system was assessed against a traditional open-loop (OL) system on two sensorimotor 'complete' paraplegic subjects. A biomechanical analysis revealed that the closed-loop control of leg swing was efficient, but without major advantages compared to OL. CL automated the control of knee extension during the stance phase of gait and for this reason was the method of preference by the subjects. For the first time, a feedback control system with a simplified configuration of four miniaturized sensors allowed the addition of instruments to collect the data of multiple physiological and biomechanical variables during FES-evoked gait. In this pilot study of two sensorimotor complete paraplegic individuals, CL ameliorated certain drawbacks of current OL systems - it required less user intervention and accounted for the inter-subject differences in their stimulation requirements.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Walking , Biomechanical Phenomena , Exercise Test , Feasibility Studies , Feedback , Humans , Muscle Contraction , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
This is a case series study with the objective of comparing two motion sensor automated strategies to avert knee buckle during functional electrical stimulation (FES)-standing against a conventional hand-controlled (HC) FES approach. The research was conducted in a clinical exercise laboratory gymnasium at the University of Sydney, Australia. The automated strategies, Aut-A and Aut-B, applied fixed and variable changes of neurostimulation, respectively, in quadriceps amplitude to precisely control knee extension during standing. HC was an "on-demand" increase of stimulation amplitude to maintain stance. Finally, maximal FES amplitude (MA) was used as a control condition, whereby knee buckle was prevented by maximal isometric muscle recruitment. Four AIS-A paraplegics undertook 4 days of testing each, and each assessment day comprised three FES standing trials using the same strategy. Cardiorespiratory responses were recorded, and quadriceps muscle oxygenation was quantified using near-infrared spectroscopy. For all subjects, the longest standing times were observed during Aut-A, followed by Aut-B, and then HC and MA. The standing times of the automated strategies were superior to HC by 9-64%. Apart from a lower heart rates during standing (P = 0.034), the automation of knee extension did not promote different cardiorespiratory responses compared with HC. The standing times during MA were significantly shorter than during the automated or "on-demand" strategies (by 80-250%). In fact, the higher isometric-evoked quadriceps contraction during MA resulted in a greater oxygen demand (P < 0.0001) and wider arteriovenous oxygen extraction (P = 0.08) when compared with the other strategies. In conclusion, even though increased standing times were demonstrated using automated control of knee extension, physiological benefits compared with HC were not evident.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Myocardium/metabolism , Respiratory Muscles/metabolism , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Motion , Movement/physiology , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Muscular atrophy due to denervation can be substantially reversed by direct electrical stimulation. Some muscle properties are, however, resistant to change. Using a rabbit model of established denervation atrophy, we investigated whether the extent of restoration would vary with the stimulation protocol. Five patterns, delivering 24,000-480,000 impulses/day, were applied for 6 or 10 weeks. The wet weight, cross-sectional area, tetanic tension, shortening velocity, and power of denervated muscles subjected to stimulation all increased significantly. The fibers were larger and more closely packed and there was no evidence of necrosis. There was a small increase in excitability. Isometric twitch kinetics remained slow and fatigue resistance did not improve. The actual pattern of stimulation had no influence on any of these findings. The results, interpreted in the context of ultrastructural changes and an ongoing clinical study, reaffirm the clinical value of introducing stimulation during the initial non-degenerative phase. They indicate that there would be little therapeutic benefit in adopting regimes more energetically demanding than those in current use, and that the focus should now shift to protocols that represent the least intrusion into activities of daily living.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Muscle Denervation , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Animals , Atrophy , Electrodes, Implanted , Hindlimb/innervation , Isometric Contraction , Joints/innervation , Joints/physiology , Male , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/innervation , Nerve Degeneration/pathology , Nerve Degeneration/physiopathology , Nerve Regeneration/physiology , Rabbits , Regression AnalysisABSTRACT
Denervating injuries result in flaccid paralysis and severe atrophy of the affected muscles. This work reviews the potential for functional restoration of such muscles by electrical stimulation, focusing on the basic scientific issues.