Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Type of study
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 33(6): 333-4, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16371222

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Allergen immunotherapy dates back to 1911 and has been used successfully to treat large numbers of patients throughout the last century. CASE REPORT: a 66-year-old woman presented with symptoms of allergic rhinitis and asthma due to sensitization to Cupressus arizonica. Specific immunotherapy was prescribed as a continuous 2-year treatment with a depot preparation of standarized and characterized allergen extracts of Cupressus arizonica pollen. Forty-eight hours after one maintenance dose of 0.8 cc, the patient presented palpable violaceous purpuric lesions and pruritus on both legs. We performed skin prick and intradermal tests with Cupressus arizonica. Twenty-four hours later, the 1/1 dilution intradermal skin test was positive. Biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis. CONCLUSIONS: A middle-aged woman experienced cutaneous non-necrotizing vasculitis after 2 years of maintenance immunotherapy. The interval between injections and the first appearance of cutaneous lesions suggests a type III hypersensitivity immune reaction. Skin biopsy of the positive intradermal test also supports this hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Plant/adverse effects , Cupressus/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Immune Complex Diseases/etiology , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/etiology , Aged , Antigens, Plant/therapeutic use , Asthma/complications , Asthma/therapy , Female , Humans , Intradermal Tests , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/complications , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Skin Tests
3.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 33(6): 333-334, nov. 2005.
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-044238

ABSTRACT

Allergen immunotherapy dates back to 1911 and has been used successfully to treat large numbers of patients throughout the last century. Case report: a 66-year-old woman presented with symptoms of allergic rhinitis and asthma due to sensitization to Cupressus arizonica. Specific immunotherapy was prescribed as a continuous 2-year treatment with a depot preparation of standarized and characterized allergen extracts of Cupressus arizonica pollen. Forty-eight hours after one maintenance dose of 0.8 cc, the patient presented palpable violaceous purpuric lesions and pruritus on both legs. We performed skin prick and intradermal tests with Cupressus arizonica. Twenty-four hours later, the 1/1 dilution intradermal skin test was positive. Biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Conclusions: A middle-aged woman experienced cutaneous non-necrotizing vasculitis after 2 years of maintenance immunotherapy. The interval between injections and the first appearance of cutaneous lesions suggests a type III hypersensitivity immune reaction. Skin biopsy of the positive intradermal test also supports this hypothesis


No disponible


Subject(s)
Female , Aged , Humans , Antigens/adverse effects , Cupressus/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Immune Complex Diseases/etiology , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/etiology , Antigens , Antigens/therapeutic use , Asthma/complications , Asthma/therapy , Intradermal Tests , Skin Tests , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/complications , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL