Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(4)2020 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32102234

ABSTRACT

Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) is a ubiquitous cytoplasmic enzyme converting glucose-6-phosphate into 6-phosphogluconate in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). The G6PD deficiency renders the inability to regenerate glutathione due to lack of Nicotine Adenosine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NADPH) and produces stress conditions that can cause oxidative injury to photoreceptors, retinal cells, and blood barrier function. In this study, we constructed pharmacophore-based models based on the complex of G6PD with compound AG1 (G6PD activator) followed by virtual screening. Fifty-three hit molecules were mapped with core pharmacophore features. We performed molecular descriptor calculation, clustering, and principal component analysis (PCA) to pharmacophore hit molecules and further applied statistical machine learning methods. Optimal performance of pharmacophore modeling and machine learning approaches classified the 53 hits as drug-like (18) and nondrug-like (35) compounds. The drug-like compounds further evaluated our established cheminformatics pipeline (molecular docking and in silico ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity) analysis). Finally, five lead molecules with different scaffolds were selected by binding energies and in silico ADMET properties. This study proposes that the combination of machine learning methods with traditional structure-based virtual screening can effectively strengthen the ability to find potential G6PD activators used for G6PD deficiency diseases. Moreover, these compounds can be considered as safe agents for further validation studies at the cell level, animal model, and even clinic setting.


Subject(s)
Drug Discovery/methods , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase/chemistry , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase/drug effects , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Machine Learning , Animals , Catalytic Domain , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency/drug therapy , Glutathione/metabolism , Humans , Molecular Docking Simulation , NADP/chemistry , NADP/metabolism , Oxidation-Reduction , Oxidative Stress , Pentose Phosphate Pathway , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs , X-Ray Diffraction
2.
J Transl Med ; 17(1): 215, 2019 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266509

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) is a multifunctional cytokine with a potent pro-inflammatory effect. It is a validated therapeutic target molecule for several disorders related to autoimmunity and inflammation. TNFα-TNF receptor-1 (TNFR1) signaling contributes to the pathological processes of these disorders. The current study is focused on finding novel small molecules that can directly bind to TNFα and/or TNFR1, preventing the interaction between TNFα or TNFR1, and regulating downstream signaling pathways. METHODS: Cheminformatics pipeline (pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening, molecular docking and in silico ADMET analysis) was used to screen for novel TNFα and TNFR1 inhibitors in the Zinc database. The pharmacophore-based models were generated to screen for the best drug like compounds in the Zinc database. RESULTS: The 39, 37 and 45 best hit molecules were mapped with the core pharmacophore features of TNFα, TNFR1, and the TNFα-TNFR1 complex respectively. They were further evaluated by molecular docking, protein-ligand interactions and in silico ADMET studies. The molecular docking analysis revealed the binding energies of TNFα, TNFR1 and the TNFα-TNFR1 complex, the basis of which was used to select the top five best binding energy compounds. Furthermore, in silico ADMET studies clearly revealed that all 15 compounds (ZINC09609430, ZINC49467549, ZINC13113075, ZINC39907639, ZINC25251930, ZINC02968981, ZINC09544246, ZINC58047088, ZINC72021182, ZINC08704414, ZINC05462670, ZINC35681945, ZINC23553920, ZINC05328058, and ZINC17206695) satisfied the Lipinski rule of five and had no toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The new selective TNFα, TNFR1 and TNFα-TNFR1 complex inhibitors can serve as anti-inflammatory agents and are promising candidates for further research.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/isolation & purification , Computational Chemistry/methods , Drug Discovery/methods , Multiprotein Complexes/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I/antagonists & inhibitors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/analysis , Binding, Competitive , Catalytic Domain/drug effects , Computational Biology/methods , Computer Simulation , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Humans , Ligands , Models, Molecular , Molecular Docking Simulation/methods , Multiprotein Complexes/chemistry , Multiprotein Complexes/metabolism , Protein Binding , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I/chemistry , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I/metabolism , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/chemistry , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL