ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Responsive deep brain stimulation (rDBS) has been recently proposed to block epileptic seizures at onset. Yet, long-term stability of brain responses to such kind of stimulation is not known. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the neural adaptation to repeated rDBS as measured by the changes of anti-epileptic efficacy of bilateral DBS of the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) versus auditory stimulation, in a rat model of spontaneous recurrent absence seizures (GAERS). METHODS: Local field potentials (LFP) were recorded in freely moving animals during 1 h up to 24 h under automated responsive stimulations (SNr-DBS and auditory). Comparison of seizure features was used to characterise transient (repetition-suppression effect) and long-lasting (stability of anti-epileptic efficacy, i.e. ratio of successfully interrupted seizures) effects of responsive stimulations. RESULTS: SNr-DBS was more efficient than auditory stimulation in blocking seizures (97% vs. 52% of seizures interrupted, respectively). Sensitivity to minimal interstimulus interval was much stronger for SNr-DBS than for auditory stimulation. Anti-epileptic efficacy of SNr-DBS was remarkably stable during long-term (24 h) recordings. CONCLUSIONS: In the GAERS model, we demonstrated the superiority of SNr-DBS to suppress seizures, as compared to auditory stimulation. Importantly, we found no long-term habituation to rDBS. However, when seizure recurrence was frequent, rDBS lack anti-epileptic efficacy because responsive stimulations became too close (time interval < 40 s) suggesting the existence of a refractory period. This study thus motivates the use of automated rDBS in patients having transient seizures separated by sufficiently long intervals.
Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Epilepsy, Absence/physiopathology , Epilepsy, Absence/therapy , Substantia Nigra/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Disease Models, Animal , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy, Absence/genetics , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Male , Rats , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Neurostimulation represents an interesting alternative therapy for patients resistant to drug treatment or who cannot benefit from resective surgery. Theoretically, neurostimulation allows the control of seizures to be tailored to the individual patient and specific form of epilepsy. Here, we review both experimental and clinical studies that have reported the possible control of epileptic seizures by means of different approaches using electrical stimulation (vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation). The rationale for targeting specific areas that have thus far been considered (i.e., vagus nerve, cerebellum, anterior or centromedial thalamus, basal ganglia, cortex and temporal lobe) is addressed in the light of experimental data and clinical effectiveness in different models and forms of epilepsy. The type of seizures that can be considered for neurostimulation, as well as the optimal parameters such as stimulation frequency and modes of stimulation (chronic, continuous or adaptative), are discussed to determine the best candidates for such a therapeutic strategy. This review points out the need for improved knowledge of neural circuits that generate seizures and/or allow their propagation, as well as a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of neurostimulation.