ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that a gender-sensitive approach to healthcare is needed in all areas of medicine. Although medical and nursing guidelines include gender-sensitive care (GSC+) recommendations, the level of implementation in health care practice is unknown. This study aims to examine the current level of implementation and acceptance of GSC+ among physicians and nurses and to identify potential gaps between guidelines and practice and barriers and facilitators of GSC+ implementation, taking the perceptions of all relevant stakeholders into account. The overarching aim is to develop holistic recommended actions to strengthen GSC+. METHODS: This study has a mixed methods triangulation design. The preparation phase consisting of a literature review and a two-part (qualitative and quantitative) data analysis will be conducted in the cardiology department of 9 pilot hospitals in Berlin, North Rhine-Westphalia, Lower Saxony, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. 18 focus groups with clinicians and nurses as well as interviews with experts in other relevant fields will be performed. In the national roll-out phase, a questionnaire survey will be conducted with hospital clinicians (n = 382), nurses (n = 386) and patients (n = 388). DISCUSSION: This study will provide comprehensive insights into the implementation and acceptance of GSC+ in cardiology from the perspective of doctors, nurses, patients, stakeholders and experts in relevant fields, such as policy and education. A focus will also be on the extent to which age or gender of health professionals, region and hospital type influence the implementation of GSC+. The identification of GSC+ implementation barriers and facilitators should help to improve the standard of care for cardiology patients of all genders. The outcomes from this study can be used to develop measures and recommended actions for the successful and sustainable implementation of gender-sensitive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in the German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS) under study number DRKS00031317.
Subject(s)
Inpatients , Physicians , Humans , Male , Female , Delivery of Health Care , Health Personnel , Focus Groups , Review Literature as TopicABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to analyze the impact of cryosurgery (CRYO) on liver metastases compared to other thermoablative techniques. In a rat liver metastases model, evidence for tumor cell spread was analyzed comparing CRYO, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT). METHODS: In an experimental study, we compared cell spillage in the washout of isolated perfused rat livers undergoing thermal ablation. Within the same model, CC531-GFP rat liver tumors were treated with CRYO, RFA, or LITT and the number of vital tumor cells within the perfusate was measured. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-9) were analyzed after in vivo ablation of rat colorectal liver metastases in the third experimental model. RESULTS: Our data showed pronounced washout of cells after CRYO with a higher amount of intravascular cells and cell detritus compared to RFA and LITT. Only the effluent fluid of cryosurgery-treated livers revealed GFP-stained tumor cells. MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression was significantly higher after cryosurgery than after RFA and LITT. CONCLUSION: When using thermoablative techniques, intravascular metastatic cell spillage is highest in CRYO, and increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases may further facilitate tumor cell spread. Therefore, RFA and LITT may be preferable whenever surgical resection of liver tumors is impossible.