Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
Atherosclerosis ; 238(2): 231-8, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25528432

ABSTRACT

Oleic acid consumption is considered cardio-protective according to studies conducted examining effects of the Mediterranean diet. However, animal models have shown that oleic acid consumption increases LDL particle cholesteryl oleate content which is associated with increased LDL-proteoglycan binding and atherosclerosis. The objective was to examine effects of varying oleic, linoleic and docosahexaenoic acid consumption on human LDL-proteoglycan binding in a non-random subset of the Canola Oil Multi-center Intervention Trial (COMIT) participants. COMIT employed a randomized, double-blind, five-period, cross-over trial design. Three of the treatment oil diets: 1) a blend of corn/safflower oil (25:75); 2) high oleic canola oil; and 3) DHA-enriched high oleic canola oil were selected for analysis of LDL-proteoglycan binding in 50 participants exhibiting good compliance. LDL particles were isolated from frozen plasma by gel filtration chromatography and LDL cholesteryl esters quantified by mass-spectrometry. LDL-proteoglycan binding was assessed using surface plasmon resonance. LDL particle cholesterol ester fatty acid composition was sensitive to the treatment fatty acid compositions, with the main fatty acids in the treatments increasing in the LDL cholesterol esters. The corn/safflower oil and high-oleic canola oil diets lowered LDL-proteoglycan binding relative to their baseline values (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0012, respectively). At endpoint, high-oleic canola oil feeding resulted in lower LDL-proteoglycan binding than corn/safflower oil (p = 0.0243) and DHA-enriched high oleic canola oil (p = 0.0249), although high-oleic canola oil had the lowest binding at baseline (p = 0.0344). Our findings suggest that high-oleic canola oil consumption in humans increases cholesteryl oleate percentage in LDL, but in a manner not associated with a rise in LDL-proteoglycan binding.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cholesterol Esters/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Diet, Mediterranean , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/administration & dosage , Oleic Acid/administration & dosage , Proteoglycans/blood , Adult , Canada , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Corn Oil/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Docosahexaenoic Acids/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Linoleic Acid/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Rapeseed Oil , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , Safflower Oil/administration & dosage , Time Factors , United States
2.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 100(1): 88-97, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24829493

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is well recognized that amounts of trans and saturated fats should be minimized in Western diets; however, considerable debate remains regarding optimal amounts of dietary n-9, n-6, and n-3 fatty acids. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the effects of varying n-9, n-6, and longer-chain n-3 fatty acid composition on markers of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, 5-period, crossover design was used. Each 4-wk treatment period was separated by 4-wk washout intervals. Volunteers with abdominal obesity consumed each of 5 identical weight-maintaining, fixed-composition diets with one of the following treatment oils (60 g/3000 kcal) in beverages: 1) conventional canola oil (Canola; n-9 rich), 2) high-oleic acid canola oil with docosahexaenoic acid (CanolaDHA; n-9 and n-3 rich), 3) a blend of corn and safflower oil (25:75) (CornSaff; n-6 rich), 4) a blend of flax and safflower oils (60:40) (FlaxSaff; n-6 and short-chain n-3 rich), or 5) high-oleic acid canola oil (CanolaOleic; highest in n-9). RESULTS: One hundred thirty individuals completed the trial. At endpoint, total cholesterol (TC) was lowest after the FlaxSaff phase (P < 0.05 compared with Canola and CanolaDHA) and highest after the CanolaDHA phase (P < 0.05 compared with CornSaff, FlaxSaff, and CanolaOleic). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were highest, and triglycerides were lowest, after CanolaDHA (P < 0.05 compared with the other diets). All diets decreased TC and LDL cholesterol from baseline to treatment endpoint (P < 0.05). CanolaDHA was the only diet that increased HDL cholesterol from baseline (3.5 ± 1.8%; P < 0.05) and produced the greatest reduction in triglycerides (-20.7 ± 3.8%; P < 0.001) and in systolic blood pressure (-3.3 ± 0.8%; P < 0.001) compared with the other diets (P < 0.05). Percentage reductions in Framingham 10-y CHD risk scores (FRS) from baseline were greatest after CanolaDHA (-19.0 ± 3.1%; P < 0.001) than after other treatments (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Consumption of CanolaDHA, a novel DHA-rich canola oil, improves HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure, thereby reducing FRS compared with other oils varying in unsaturated fatty acid composition. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01351012.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/administration & dosage , Oleic Acid/administration & dosage , Triglycerides/blood , Adult , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Body Mass Index , Corn Oil/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Diet , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Docosahexaenoic Acids/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oleic Acid/blood , Rapeseed Oil , Risk Factors , Safflower Oil/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Waist Circumference
3.
Trials ; 15: 136, 2014 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24754911

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Canola Oil Multicenter Intervention Trial (COMIT) was a randomized controlled crossover study designed to evaluate the effects of five diets that provided different oils and/or oil blends on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in individuals with abdominal obesity. The present objective is to report preliminary findings on plasma fatty acid profiles in volunteers with abdominal obesity, following the consumption of diets enriched with n-3, n-6 and n-9 fatty acids. METHODS: COMIT was conducted at three clinical sites, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, Québec City, Québec, Canada and University Park, Pennsylvania, United States. Inclusion criteria were at least one of the followings: waist circumference (≥90 cm for males and ≥84 cm for females), and at least one other criterion: triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L, high density lipoprotein cholesterol <1 mmol/L (males) or <1.3 mmol/L (females), blood pressure ≥130 mmHg (systolic) and/or ≥85 mmHg (diastolic), and glucose ≥5.5 mmol/L. Weight-maintaining diets that included shakes with one of the dietary oil blends were provided during each of the five 30-day dietary phases. Dietary phases were separated by four-week washout periods. Treatment oils were canola oil, high oleic canola oil, high oleic canola oil enriched with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), flax oil and safflower oil blend, and corn oil and safflower oil blend. A per protocol approach with a mixed model analysis was decided to be appropriate for data analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy volunteers were randomized and 130 completed the study with a dropout rate of 23.5%. The mean plasma total DHA concentrations, which were analyzed among all participants as a measure of adherence, increased by more than 100% in the DHA-enriched phase, compared to other phases, demonstrating excellent dietary adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and retention strategies were effective in achieving a sufficient number of participants who completed the study protocol to enable sufficient statistical power to resolve small differences in outcome measures. It is expected that the study will generate important data thereby enhancing our understanding of the effects of n-3, n-6, and n-9 fatty acid-containing oils on CVD risks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01351012.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Corn Oil/administration & dosage , Diet , Docosahexaenoic Acids/administration & dosage , Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/administration & dosage , Fatty Acids, Omega-6/administration & dosage , Linseed Oil/administration & dosage , Obesity, Abdominal/diet therapy , Oleic Acid/administration & dosage , Safflower Oil/administration & dosage , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Pressure , Canada , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Corn Oil/blood , Cross-Over Studies , Docosahexaenoic Acids/blood , Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/blood , Fatty Acids, Omega-6/blood , Female , Humans , Linseed Oil/metabolism , Lipids/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Abdominal/blood , Obesity, Abdominal/complications , Obesity, Abdominal/diagnosis , Obesity, Abdominal/physiopathology , Oleic Acid/blood , Patient Compliance , Patient Dropouts , Pennsylvania , Rapeseed Oil , Safflower Oil/blood , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Waist Circumference
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL