ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mesotherapy, a technique of transdermal microinjections of specific preparations, is increasingly used in fields such as dermatology and specifically for alopecia treatment. Its popularity stems from its ability to deliver drugs in a targeted manner while minimizing systemic side effects. OBJECTIVE: To assess and review current knowledge regarding the use of mesotherapy to deliver alopecia medications and highlight future directions for research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors used research databases including PubMed and Google Scholar to identify current literature on mesotherapy and alopecia. The following search terms were used among other terms: "Mesotherapy" or "Intradermal" AND "Alopecia". RESULTS: Recent studies are promising for the intradermal delivery of dutasteride and minoxidil in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. CONCLUSION: Although limitations exist with dutasteride and minoxidil therapies, further research regarding the preparation, delivery, and maintenance of these drugs is warranted as mesotherapy could establish this technique as a safe, effective, and viable treatment option for androgenetic alopecia.
Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Mesotherapy , Humans , Dutasteride/therapeutic use , Minoxidil/therapeutic use , Alopecia/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Alopecia, the loss of hair on the scalp and/or body, experienced by millions of people worldwide, can be a very debilitating condition. Specifically, androgenetic alopecia (AGA), commonly known as male or female pattern baldness, is the most common form of hair loss. In the African diaspora, oils have traditionally been used to promote hair growth and recently, the application of hair oils to the scalp for the treatment of alopecia has become increasingly popular. With the recent surge of hair oil usage in the Black community, more research is needed to determine the efficacy of hair oils, as most studies have primarily used mice subjects. This article reviews the existing literature to better understand the use of hair oils in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Specifically, we investigate the popular carrier oils, castor oil, and pumpkin oil as well as the essential oils, lavender, peppermint, rosemary, and tea tree oil.
Subject(s)
Oils, Volatile , Tea Tree Oil , Humans , Mice , Animals , Alopecia/drug therapy , Hair , ScalpABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Given the immense psychosocial effects of hair loss as well as patient preference for treatment type, it is common for patients to turn to alternative medicine to improve their conditions. However, the commonly used alternative treatments can vary greatly between patients and particularly among skin of color populations. OBJECTIVE: In this work, we performed a scoping review of the evidence behind alternative topical treatments for hair loss used by skin of color patients. Methods & Materials: We conducted a comprehensive search using PubMed to identify relevant studies. RESULTS: Results show a diverse variety of hair growth products used; however, only a few are supported by randomized controlled trials, case reports, pilot studies, and animal studies with some important limitations. CONCLUSION: This information will be exceedingly useful for physicians so they may relay accurate evidence on these haircare practices to their skin of color patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(7):726-731. doi:10.36849/JDD.5689.
Subject(s)
Skin Pigmentation , Skin , Administration, Topical , Alopecia/drug therapy , Color , Hair , Humans , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Evaluation of alopecia often includes laboratory testing for ferritin, thyroid stimulating hormone, vitamin D, and zinc as previous studies have found associations between non-scarring alopecia and vitamin deficiencies. These studies are limited by small sample sizes, and subsequent analyses showed conflicting results. This study aims to explore laboratory abnormalities in non-scarring alopecia and examine whether supplementation is associated with increased hair growth. A total of 131 patients completed at least two visits by a hair specialist at NYU’s Faculty Group Practice. They had quantitative hair measurements taken at each visit and laboratory tests performed at the first visit. There were 20 (15.3%) patients with abnormal lab results. The most common vitamin deficiency was ferritin (6.5%). Forty-two (32%) patients received supplementations that specifically addressed their vitamin or hormone deficiency. Multivariate regression analysis showed that supplementation did not significantly impact hair density or diameter (P=0.73; P=0.96, respectively). Baseline hair density and diameter were positively associated with change in hair density and diameter, respectively (standardized coefficient [β] 0.57, P<0.01; β 0.61, P<0.01). The number of prescribed oral medications was negatively associated with change in hair diameter (β -6.60, P=0.04). Limitations of this study include the single-center, retrospective design and the short followup interval. However, our findings suggest that vitamin supplementation may not lead to improved outcomes in non-scarring alopecia, thus limiting the utility of laboratory testing. Additional large-scale prospective studies are needed to improve our management of alopecia. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(7):807-809. doi:10.36849/JDD.5886.
Subject(s)
Alopecia , Laboratories , Alopecia/diagnosis , Alopecia/drug therapy , Dietary Supplements , Hair , Humans , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Importance: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a novel therapy for alopecia. Although the use of PRP remains under investigation, medical practitioners administer PRP for hair regrowth without quantitative evidence of clinical results. Objective: Systematically review literature regarding PRP for alopecia. Evidence Review: PRISMA guidelines were utilized to search the PubMed database in May 2019 with search terms "platelet rich plasma" and "hair", "hair loss", or "alopecia". Manuscripts were included if they were written in English and described PRP treatment in human subjects with alopecia. Findings: Sixty-one articles discussed the use of PRP as monotherapy, or in combination with other medical modalities, for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA), alopecia areata (AA), and cicatricial alopecia, ranging from level Ib to IV evidence. PRP results in significant increase in hair density and hair shaft width in AGA patients, with high rates of patient satisfaction and minimal adverse events. Data heterogeneity and limited number of well-designed, large-scale clinical trials were limitations of this review. Conclusions and Relevance: Preliminary results regarding the use of PRP for AGA, AA, and cicatricial alopecias are promising. Physicians should be aware that current studies often report qualitative, rather than quantitative, clinical outcomes and should counsel patients regarding PRP treatment efficacy accordingly. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(7): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5192.
Subject(s)
Alopecia/therapy , Biological Therapy/methods , Hair/growth & development , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A systematic review failed to identify any systemic therapy used in alopecia areata (AA) where use is supported by robust evidence from high-quality randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To produce an international consensus statement on the use and utility of various treatments for AA. METHODS: Fifty hair experts from 5 continents were invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process. Agreement of 66% or greater was considered consensus. RESULTS: In the first round, consensus was achieved in 22 of 423 (5%) questions. After a face-to-face meeting in round 3, overall, consensus was achieved for only 130 (33%) treatment-specific questions. There was greater consensus for intralesional treatment of AA (19 [68%]) followed by topical treatment (25 [43%]). Consensus was achieved in 45 (36%) questions pertaining to systemic therapies in AA. The categories with the least consensus were phototherapy and nonprescription therapies. LIMITATIONS: The study included a comprehensive list of systemic treatments for AA but not all treatments used. CONCLUSION: Despite divergent opinions among experts, consensus was achieved on a number of pertinent questions. The concluding statement also highlights areas where expert consensus is lacking and where an international patient registry could enable further research.
Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata/therapy , Administration, Oral , Administration, Topical , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Complementary Therapies , Delphi Technique , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Expert Testimony , Humans , Injections, Intralesional , Phototherapy , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Importance: Persistent alopecia occurs in a subset of patients undergoing chemotherapy, yet the quality of life (QOL) of these patients and their response to therapy have not been described in a large patient cohort. Objective: To characterize the clinical presentation of patients with persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (pCIA) or endocrine therapy-induced alopecia after chemotherapy (EIAC) and their QOL and treatment outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective multicenter cohort of 192 women with cancer treated with cytotoxic agents who received a clinical diagnosis of persistent alopecia (98 with pCIA and 94 with EIAC) between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2017, was analyzed. All patients were from the dermatology service in 2 comprehensive cancer centers and 1 tertiary-care hospital. Data on demographics, chemotherapy regimens, severity, clinical patterns, and response to hair-growth promoting agents were assessed. Data from the Hairdex questionnaire were used to assess the QOL of patients with alopecia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical presentation, response to dermatologic therapy, and QOL of patients with pCIA were assessed and compared with those of patients with EIAC. Results: A total of 98 women with pCIA (median age, 56.5 years [range, 18-83 years]) and 94 women with EIAC (median age, 56 years [range, 29-84 years]) were included. The most common agents associated with pCIA were taxanes for 80 patients (82%); the most common agents associated with EIAC were aromatase inhibitors for 58 patients (62%). Diffuse alopecia was predominant in patients with pCIA compared with patients with EIAC (31 of 75 [41%] vs 23 of 92 [25%]; P = .04), with greater severity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, grade 2) among patients with pCIA (29 of 75 [39%] vs 12 of 92 [13%]; P < .001). A negative emotional effect was reported by both groups. After treatment with topical minoxidil or spironolactone, moderate to significant improvement was observed for 36 of 54 patients with pCIA (67%) and for 32 of 42 patients with EIAC (76%). Conclusions and Relevance: Persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia is frequently more severe and diffuse when compared with EIAC, and both groups of patients experienced a negative effect. A modest benefit was observed with dermatologic therapy. Additional studies are warranted to develop effective strategies for prevention and effective therapy for pCIA and EIAC.
Subject(s)
Alopecia/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Minoxidil/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Spironolactone/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alopecia/drug therapy , Alopecia/epidemiology , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Importance: Endocrine therapy-induced alopecia (EIA) has been anecdotally reported but not systematically described. Objective: To characterize EIA in patients with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of 112 patients with breast cancer, diagnosed with EIA from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016, the patients were examined at the dermatology service in a large tertiary care hospital and comprehensive cancer center. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical features, alopecia-related quality of life (QoL), and response to minoxidil of EIA in patients with breast cancer were assessed. Data from the Hairdex Questionnaire was used to assess the impact of the alopecia on patients QoL. Higher score indicates lower QoL (0-100 score). Efficacy of minoxidil was measured at 3 or 6 months by a single-blinded investigator through standardized clinical photographs of the scalp. Results: A total of 112 female patients with breast cancer were included (median [range] age, 60 [34-90] years). A total of 104 patients (93%) had standardized clinical photographs; of these, 59 patients (53%) had trichoscopy images available at baseline, and 46 patients (41%) were assessed for response to minoxidil. Alopecia was attributed to aromatase inhibitors in 75 patients (67%) and tamoxifen in 37 (33%). Severity was grade 1 in 96 of 104 patients (92%), and the pattern was similar to androgenetic alopecia. The predominant trichoscopic feature at baseline was the presence of vellus hairs and intermediate- and thick-diameter terminal hair shafts. A negative impact on QoL was reported, with a higher effect in the emotion domain according to the Hairdex score (mean [SD], 41.8 [21.3]; P < .001). After treatment with topical minoxidil, moderate or significant improvement in alopecia was observed in 37 of 46 patients (80%). Conclusions and Relevance: Endocrine therapies are associated with a pattern alopecia similar to androgenetic-type, consistent with the mechanism of action of causal agents. A significant negative impact on QoL was reported by patients, despite mostly mild alopecia severity.
Subject(s)
Alopecia/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Minoxidil/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alopecia/chemically induced , Alopecia/psychology , Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Dermoscopy , Emotions , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Tamoxifen/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Biotin, also known as Vitamin B7 or vitamin H, is a water-soluble B vitamin that acts as an essential cofactor for several carboxylases involved in the cellular metabolism of fatty acids, amino acids, and gluconeogenesis. Although there exists an incredible amount of social media hype and market advertising touting its efficacy for the improvement of hair quantity and quality, biotin's efficacy for hair remains largely unsubstantiated in scientific literature. We reviewed all pertinent scientific literature regarding the efficacy of biotin supplementation for hair growth and quality improvement, and we also investigated its popularity in society defined as a function of market analytics. To date, there have been no clinical trials conducted to investigate the efficacy of biotin supplementation for the treatment of alopecia of any kind, nor has there been any randomized controlled trial to study its effect on hair quality and quantity in human subjects. Because of the lack of clinical evidence, its use to improve hair quantity or quality is not routinely recommended. However, societal infatuation with biotin supplementation is not only propagated by its glamorization in popular media, its popularity is vastly disproportionate to the insufficient clinical evidence supporting it's efficacy in hair improvement. In other words, biotin supplements are quite "in vogue", without there being any real reason to be so.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(5):496-500.
.Subject(s)
Alopecia/drug therapy , Biotin/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Social Media/trends , Social Perception , Alopecia/diagnosis , Alopecia/psychology , Humans , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Treatment of alopecia areata is dependent on age of patient as well as the extent and duration of scalp involvement. Treatments include steroids, topical immunotherapy, topical minoxidil, anthralin, and immunosuppressants. Each case must be dealt with on a customized individual basis.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Alopecia Areata/drug therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Anthralin/therapeutic use , Cyclobutanes/therapeutic use , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Injections, Intralesional , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Minoxidil/therapeutic use , PUVA Therapy , Self-Help GroupsABSTRACT
The relationship of the stress response to the pathogenesis of alopecia areata (AA) was investigated by subjecting normal and skin graft-induced, AA-affected C3H/HeJ mice to light ether anesthesia or restraint stress. Plasma corticosterone (CORT), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and estradiol (E2) levels were determined by RIA, whereas gene expression in brains, lymphoid organs, and skin was measured by quantitative RT-PCR for corticotropin-releasing hormone (Crh), arginine vasopressin (Avp), proopiomelanocortin (Pomc), glucocorticoid receptor (Nr3c1), mineralocorticoid receptor (Nr3c2), corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor types 1 and 2 (Crhr1, Crhr2), interleukin-12 (Il12), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnf alpha), and estrogen receptors type-1 (Esr1) and type-2 (Esr2). AA mice had a marked increase in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) tone and activity centrally, and peripherally in the skin and lymph nodes. There was also altered interaction between the adrenal and gonadal axes compared with that in normal mice. Stress further exacerbated changes in AA mouse HPA activity both centrally and peripherally. AA mice had significantly blunted CORT and ACTH responses to acute ether stress (physiological stressor) and a deficit in habituation to repeated restraint stress (psychological stressor). The positive correlation of HPA hormone levels with skin Th1 cytokines suggests that altered HPA activity may occur as a consequence of the immune response associated with AA.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Glands/pathology , Alopecia Areata/genetics , Alopecia Areata/pathology , Hypothalamus/pathology , Pituitary Gland/pathology , Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/blood , Animals , Corticosterone/blood , Cytokines/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Estradiol/blood , Gene Expression Regulation , Hormones/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C3H , Skin/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few data exist documenting the effectiveness of psoriasis day-care treatment programs (PDTPs) using standardized efficacy measurements. OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze the efficacy of a PDTP using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 132 patients treated at our PDTP. Sufficient data existed to permit PASI analysis using a simplified method for a representative subgroup of 64 patients, who formed the study population. Patients received phototherapy and topical treatments over 2 weeks. The outcome measures included a baseline and day 11 PASI, a physician global assessment (PGA), and adverse events reported by the patients. RESULTS: Mean baseline PASI was 13.6 (N = 64), with a 59.6% reduction by day 11. A PASI reduction of > or = 50% was seen in 75% of patients, with 30% of patients achieving > or = 75% reduction of PASI. Day 11 PGA demonstrated a 69.9% improvement. CONCLUSION: With a reduction in PASI of 59.6% at 11 days, our PDTP, with phototherapy and topical agents, seems to be a rapid and effective therapy for psoriasis.
Subject(s)
Day Care, Medical , PUVA Therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Adult , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Psoriasis/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although there are a multitude of therapeutic modalities for removing unwanted facial hair in women, there is very little information on using the newer medical treatment approaches in combination. This study was designed to determine whether topical eflornithine can enhance the efficacy of laser hair removal. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, right-left comparison study of eflornithine cream combined with laser treatment versus laser alone for treating unwanted hair on the upper lip in women. All subjects underwent treatment to the entire upper lip with a long pulse alexandrite laser (10-40 ms pulse duration) at fluences of 7 to 40 J/cm(2). Laser treatments were performed every 4 weeks for up to 6 sessions. Each patient also applied either eflornithine or placebo cream twice daily to each side of the upper lip in a double-blinded manner. Subjects were evaluated for safety by recording adverse events and for efficacy via (1) investigator global scoring, (2) patient self assessment, and (3) hair count analysis. RESULTS: Both treatment modalities were well tolerated by the 31 evaluable patients. All 3 outcome measures showed significantly better results in favor of eflornithine plus laser versus laser treatment alone. At the end of the study, complete or almost complete hair removal was achieved in 29 of 31 (93.5%) of the eflornithine-laser-treated sites versus 21 of 31 (67.9%) for the placebo cream-laser-treated sites (P = .021, McNemar test). Statistically significant differences in favor of eflornithine were likewise demonstrated at the final assessment through blinded patient grading (13/31 patients [41.9%] thought that the eflornithine was superior to placebo, P = .029, Poisson regression) and hair count analysis (P < .01, paired t test). LIMITATIONS: This is a single-center study that did not determine whether the differences noted above last beyond 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of both investigator and patient assessments and hair count analysis, we have demonstrated that the addition of eflornithine to laser hair removal results in a more rapid and complete reduction of unwanted facial hair in women when the combination is used for up to 6 months.
Subject(s)
Eflornithine/therapeutic use , Hair Removal/methods , Hirsutism/therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Lip , Middle Aged , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is currently no quantitative tool for evaluating vitiligo treatment response using parametric methods. OBJECTIVE: To develop and apply a simple clinical tool, the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI), to model the response of vitiligo to narrowband UV-B (NB-UV-B) phototherapy using parametric tests. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, bilateral left-right comparison trial. SETTING: North American tertiary care, university-affiliated phototherapy center. PATIENTS: Patients older than 18 years with stable vitiligo involving at least 5% of their total body surface in a symmetric distribution. INTERVENTION: Treatment with NB-UV-B was given 3 times a week to half of the body on all patients for either 60 treatments or 6 months. The contralateral side served as a no-treatment control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Repigmentation was assessed using the VASI, which was based on a composite estimate of the overall area of vitiligo patches at baseline and the degree of macular repigmentation within these patches over time. The VASI was validated separately against physician and patient global assessments. The overall reductions in VASI for NB-UV-B and control groups were modeled by multilevel regression with random effects and compared parametrically. RESULTS: The VASI scoring correlated well with both patient and physician global assessments (P =.05 and P<.001, respectively, using ordinal logistic regression). The extent of repigmentation after 6 months on the treated side was 42.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.7%-59.0%) vs 3.3% (95% confidence interval -19.3% to 30.0%) on the untreated side (P<.001). A significant difference between control and NB-UV-B groups was apparent within the first 2 months of therapy. The legs, trunk, and arms were much more likely to repigment than the feet and hands. CONCLUSIONS: The VASI is a quantitative clinical tool that can be used to evaluate vitiligo parametrically. Patients treated with NB-UV-B can be expected to achieve approximately 42.9% repigmentation of their vitiligo after 6 months of treatment, with the greatest response being achieved over the trunk and nonacral portions of the extremities.