Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int ; 17(5): 456-460, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30197163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially when it leads to infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). Modern treatment of IPN frequently involves prolonged courses of antibiotics in combination with minimally invasive therapies. This study aimed to update the existing evidence base by identifying the pathogens causing IPN and therefore aid future selection of empirical antibiotics. METHODS: Clinical data, including microbiology results, of consecutive patients with IPN undergoing minimally invasive necrosectomy at our institution between January 2009 and July 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The results of 40 patients (22 males and 18 females, median age 60 years) with IPN were reviewed. The etiology of AP was gallstones, alcohol, dyslipidemia and unknown in 31, 2, 2 and 5 patients, respectively. The most frequently identified microbes in microbiology cultures were Enterococcus faecalis and faecium (22.5% and 20.0%) and Escherichia coli (20.0%). In 19 cases the cultures grew multiple organisms. The antibiotics with the least resistance amongst the microbiota were teicoplanin (5.0%), linezolid (5.6%), ertapenem (6.5%), and meropenem (7.4%). CONCLUSION: The carbapenem antibiotics, ertapenem and meropenem provide good antimicrobial cover against the common, mainly enteral, microorganisms causing IPN. Culture and sensitivity results of acquired samples should be regularly reviewed to adjust prescribing and monitor for emergence of resistance.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/drug therapy , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Drainage/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/mortality , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 26(5): 700-6, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22503433

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The mechanism by which the multidisciplinary approach to diabetic foot disease reduces amputation rates is unclear. Ischemia, sepsis, and necrosis represent aspects of severe diabetic foot disease amenable to intervention. In 2006, a vascular unit introduced a rapid access service for severe foot disease, augmenting the established community provision. This study aimed to determine whether concurrent changes in amputation rates were observed, and to identify areas that may have influenced outcomes. METHODS: Unit data prospectively collected during 4 years for patients with lower-limb disease were compared with data retrieved over 2 years before the foot service. Outcome measurements were major amputations, foot surgery, vascular interventions, admissions, and length of stay. RESULTS: Major amputation rates associated with diabetes peaked in 2005 at 24.7/10,000 vs. 1.07/10,000 in 2009; (relative risk = 0.043, 95% confidence interval = 0.006-0.322). The proportion of diabetic to nondiabetic amputations decreased; foot surgery rates also dropped (53.7/10,000 in 2006 vs. 7.5/10,000 in 2009). The number of open revascularization procedures decreased, but the rates of endovascular procedures remained generally constant. Hospital admission rates decreased after initially peaking, and the length of stay was unchanged (16 vs. 15.5 days in 2004 and 2009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of a vascular unit with community care has been associated with improved outcomes for patients with diabetic foot disease. Improvements were not related to the increased number of vascular procedures or hospitalizations, but did coincide with a greater proportion of patients attending the foot unit. The referral of patients to the unit facilitates the rapid management of severe disease, reducing delays deleterious to outcomes.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/therapy , Hospitals, District/organization & administration , Hospitals, General/organization & administration , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , State Medicine/organization & administration , Vascular Surgical Procedures/organization & administration , Amputation, Surgical , Chi-Square Distribution , Cooperative Behavior , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Research , Humans , Length of Stay , Limb Salvage , Logistic Models , Models, Organizational , Patient Admission , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Wales
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL