Resection with intraoperative cesium-131 brachytherapy as salvage therapy for recurrent brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The authors' objective was to examine the safety and efficacy of salvage intracranial cesium-131 brachytherapy in combination with resection of recurrent brain tumors. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients treated with intraoperative intracranial cesium-131 brachytherapy at a single institution. Permanent suture-stranded cesium-131 seeds were implanted in the resection cavity after maximal safe tumor resection. The primary outcomes of interest were local, locoregional (within 1 cm), and intracranial control, as well as rates of overall survival (OS), neurological death, symptomatic adverse radiation effects (AREs), and surgical complication rate graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, 36 patients received 40 consecutive cesium-131 implants for 42 recurrent brain tumors and received imaging follow-up for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 17.0 (12.7-25.9) months. Twenty patients (55.6%) with 22 implants were treated for recurrent brain metastasis, 12 patients (33.3%) with 16 implants were treated for recurrent atypical (n = 7) or anaplastic (n = 5) meningioma, and 4 patients (11.1%) were treated for other recurrent primary brain neoplasms. All except 1 tumor (97.6%) had received prior radiotherapy, including 20 (47.6%) that underwent 2 or more prior radiotherapy treatments and 23 (54.8%) that underwent prior resection. The median (IQR) tumor size was 3.0 (2.3-3.7) cm, and 17 lesions (40.5%) had radiographic evidence of ARE prior to salvage therapy. Actuarial 1-year local/locoregional/intracranial control rates for the whole cohort and patients with metastases and meningiomas were 91.6%/83.4%/47.9%, 88.8%/84.4%/45.4%, and 100%/83.9%/46.4%, respectively. No cases of local recurrence of any histology (0 of 27) occurred after gross-total resection (p = 0.012, log-rank test). The 1-year OS rates for the whole cohort and patients with metastases and meningiomas were 82.7%, 79.1%, and 91.7%, respectively, and the median (IQR) survival of all patients was 26.7 (15.6-36.4) months. Seven patients (19.4%) experienced neurological death from progressive intracranial disease (7 of 14 total deaths [50%]), 5 (13.9%) of whom died of leptomeningeal disease. Symptomatic AREs were observed in 9.5% of resection cavities (n = 4), of which 1 (2.4%) was grade 3 in severity. The surgical complication rate was 16.7% (n = 7); 4 (9.5%) of these patients had grade 3 or higher complications, including 1 patient (2.4%) who died perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Cesium-131 brachytherapy resulted in good local control and acceptable rates of symptomatic AREs and surgical complications in this heavily pretreated cohort, and it may be a reasonable salvage adjuvant treatment for this patient population.

Radiosurgery versus open surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: The randomized, controlled ROSE trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for patients with pharmacoresistant unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). METHODS: This randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial recruited adults eligible for open surgery among 14 centers in the USA, UK, and India. Treatment was either SRS at 24 Gy to the 50% isodose targeting mesial structures, or standardized ATL. Outcomes were seizure remission (absence of disabling seizures between 25 and 36 months), verbal memory (VM), and quality of life (QOL) at 36-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (31 in SRS, 27 in ATL) were treated. Sixteen (52%) SRS and 21 (78%) ATL patients achieved seizure remission (difference between ATL and SRS = 26%, upper 1-sided 95% confidence interval = 46%, P value at the 15% noninferiority margin = .82). Mean VM changes from baseline for 21 English-speaking, dominant-hemisphere patients did not differ between groups; consistent worsening occurred in 36% of SRS and 57% of ATL patients. QOL improved with seizure remission. Adverse events were anticipated cerebral edema and related symptoms for some SRS patients, and cerebritis, subdural hematoma, and others for ATL patients. SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that ATL has an advantage over SRS in terms of proportion of seizure remission, and both SRS and ATL appear to have effectiveness and reasonable safety as treatments for MTLE. SRS is an alternative to ATL for patients with contraindications for or with reluctance to undergo open surgery.

Surgical Resection and Interstitial Iodine-125 Brachytherapy for High-Grade Meningiomas: A 25-Year Series.

BACKGROUND: Atypical and malignant meningiomas can recur despite resection and radiation. OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes of patients with recurrent atypical or malignant meningioma treated with repeat resection and permanent iodine-125 ( 125 I) brachy-therapy. METHODS: Charts of patients who underwent surgical resection and 125 I brachyther-apy implantation for atypical and malignant meningiomas between 1988 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial method was used to calculate progression-free and overall survival. The log-rank test was used to compare groups. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent 50 resections with 125 I brachytherapy im-plantations. All patients had undergone previous resections and 85% had previously undergone radiation. Median follow-up was 7.5 years after diagnosis and 2.3 years after brachytherapy. Median time to progression after resection with 125 I brachytherapy was 20.9 months for atypical meningioma, 11.4 months for malignant meningioma, and 11.4 months for the combined groups. Median survival after re-resection and 125 I brachytherapy was 3.5 years for atypical meningioma, 2.3 years for malignant menin-gioma, and 3.3 years for all subjects. Median overall survival after diagnosis was 11.1 years for atypical meningioma, 9.1 years for malignant meningioma, and 9.4 years for all subjects. Complications occurred in 17 patients and included radiation necrosis (n = 8, 16%), wound breakdown (n = 6, 12%), hydrocephalus (n = 4, 8%), infection (n = 3, 6%), and a pseudomeningocele (n = 2, 5%). CONCLUSION: This is the largest experience with adjuvant 125 I brachytherapy for recurrent high-grade meningiomas. The outcomes support the use of adjuvant brachytherapy as an option for these aggressive tumors.

Deep arteriovenous malformations in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and insula: multimodality management, patient selection, and results.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to describe a single institution's experience treating arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the basal ganglia, thalamus, and insula in a multimodal fashion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all deep AVMs treated at our institution between 1997 and 2011 with attention to patient selection, treatment strategies, and radiographic and functional outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients underwent initial treatment at our institution. 64% presented with hemorrhage with 29% located in the basal ganglia, 41% in the thalamus, and 30% in the insula. 80% were Spetzler-Martin grade III-IV. Initial treatment was microsurgical resection in 42%, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in 45%, and observation in 12%. Radiographic cure was achieved in 54% after initial surgical or SRS treatment (71% and 23%, respectively) and in 63% after subsequent treatments, with good functional outcomes in 78% (median follow-up 2.2 years). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed treatment group and age as factors associated with radiographic cure, whereas Spetzler-Martin score and time to follow-up were significantly associated with improved/unchanged functional status at time of last follow-up. Posttreatment hemorrhage occurred in 11% (7% of surgical and 18% of SRS patients). CONCLUSIONS: Modern treatment of deep AVMs includes a multidisciplinary approach utilizing microsurgery, SRS, embolization, and observation. Supplementary grading adds meaningfully to traditional Spetzler-Martin grading to guide patient selection. Surgical resection is more likely to result in obliteration compared with SRS, and is associated with satisfactory results in carefully selected patients.

Surgical resection and permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy for brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of surgical resection and permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy without adjuvant whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients were treated with permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy at the time of resection of brain metastases from 1997 to 2003. Actuarial freedom from progression (FFP) and survival were measured from the date of surgery and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with censoring at last imaging for FFP endpoints. RESULTS: The median survival was 11.3 months overall, 12.0 months in 19 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases and 7.3 months in 21 patients with recurrent brain metastases. Twenty-two patients (55%) remained free of progression of brain metastases, three failed at the resection cavity (including one with leptomeningeal dissemination), two failed with leptomeningeal spread only, and 13 failed elsewhere in the brain including two who also had leptomeningeal disease. The 1-year resection cavity FFP probabilities were 92%, 86% and 88%; and brain FFP probabilities were 29%, 43% and 37% for the newly diagnosed, recurrent and all patients, respectively. Symptomatic necrosis developed 7.4-40.0 months (median, 19.5 months) after brachytherapy in 9 patients (23%), confirmed by resection in 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent local control was achieved using permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy for brain metastasis resection cavities, although there is a high risk of radiation necrosis over time. These data support consideration of permanent brachytherapy without adjuvant WBRT as a treatment option in patients with symptomatic or large newly diagnosed or recurrent brain metastases.

Prognostic value of detecting recurrent glioblastoma multiforme in surgical specimens from patients after radiotherapy: should pathology evaluation alter treatment decisions?

The prognostic significance of the histologic type and grade of gliomas at initial surgery is well established, but the value of histologic findings in resections after radiotherapy is unclear. Despite this uncertainty, pathologic interpretation of specimens after radiotherapy influences immediate treatment decisions. It is important to determine if, and to what extent, treatment decisions should be based on this information. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of pathologic evaluation in postradiation specimens from 54 patients with similar clinical features who underwent a second surgery for the treatment of radiologic worsening after external beam radiotherapy. We categorized the specimens from the second surgery as either recurrent tumor (category 1) or radionecrosis (category 2). Patients in category 1 had actively proliferating neoplasms with classical features of glioblastoma, whereas patients in category 2 had no evidence of tumor in their surgical specimens. Cases in which a clear-cut definition could not be made were labeled indeterminate (category 3). Despite the morphological evidence of tumor, there were no significant differences between categories 1 and 2 in any of the survival parameters tested. The only difference between groups was higher frequency of iodine 125 (125I) placement at second surgery in category 1 patients (P <.028). Patients in category 1 with or without 125I treatment had similar survival characteristics. We conclude that histopathologic evaluation of postradiotherapy specimens was not helpful in predicting outcome or dictating further management. A comprehensive prospective study with advanced radiologic, pathologic, and molecular analyses may be more useful to determine prognostically valuable parameters.