Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 1084, 2023 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37946198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Survival following melanoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have both been individually associated with previous history of non-melanoma skin cancers (specifically keratinocyte carcinomas [KC]). Furthermore, melanoma and CLL have been reported to occur within the same patients. The survival experience of patients with both cancers is understudied, and the role of history of KC is unknown. Additional research is needed to tease apart the independent associations between KC and CLL survival, KC and melanoma survival, and the co-occurrence of all three cancers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients who were diagnosed with melanoma and/or CLL at a comprehensive cancer center between 2008 and 2020. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to examine the association between history of KC and survival following melanoma and/or CLL with careful consideration of calendar year of diagnosis, treatment regimens and other risk factors. A nested case-control study comparing patients with both CLL and melanoma to those with only CLL or only melanoma was conducted to compare blood parameters across the three groups. RESULTS: A time-dependent association was observed between history of KC and favorable melanoma survival within 4 years following diagnosis and poorer survival post 7 years after melanoma diagnosis. History of KC was not significantly associated with survival following the diagnosis of CLL, after adjustment for clinical factors including historical/concurrent melanoma. Patients with co-occurring melanoma and CLL tended to be diagnosed with melanoma first and had elevated blood parameters including white blood cell and lymphocyte counts as compared with patients who were diagnosed with only melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: History of KC was an independent predictor of survival following melanoma but not of CLL. Additional studies are needed to determine if blood parameters obtained at the time of melanoma diagnosis could be used as a cost-effective way to identify those at high risk of asymptomatic CLL for the promotion of earlier CLL diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/complications , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/epidemiology , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Melanoma/complications , Melanoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma/pathology , Keratinocytes/pathology
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(11): 3334-3340, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30073600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines regarding specific resection margins for primary Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) are not well established. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend 1- to 2-cm resection margins. This study aimed to determine the impact of margin width on local recurrence (LR), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and type of wound closure. METHODS: All patients who underwent resection of primary MCC at a single institution from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients underwent resection of primary MCC with resection margin width identified in the operative report. The median age was 76 years, and 65.8% of the patients were men. Of the 240 patients, 85 (35.4%) had head and neck primaries, 140 (58.3%) had extremity primaries, and 15 (6.3%) had trunk primaries. In terms of margins, 69 patients (28.8%) had a margin of 1 cm, 36 patients (15%) had a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 135 patients (56.2%) had a margin of 2 cm or more. The median follow-up period was 21 months. The LR rate was 2.9% for a margin of 1 cm, 2.8% for a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 5.2% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.80). The 5-year OS was 63.6% for a margin of 1 cm, 59.7% for a margin of 1.1-1.9, and 70.7% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.66). The 5-year DSS was 80.3% for a margin of 1 cm, 66.2% for a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 91.8% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.28). For wound closure, 43.5, 50, and 65.9% of the patients respectively required a flap or graft with a margin of 1, 1.1-1.9, and 2 cm or more (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-cm resection margins did not increase the risk of LR. Margin width did not make a significant difference in DSS or OS. Larger resection margins increase the need for a graft or flap closure.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/mortality , Margins of Excision , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/secondary , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Rate
3.
Cancer Med ; 7(4): 991-996, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478277

ABSTRACT

Clinical trial enrollments in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer have historically been lower than those in pediatric and older adult populations. We sought to examine therapeutic trial enrollment rates at our cancer center. We performed a retrospective evaluation of AYA patients treated before and after the first checkpoint inhibitor trial opened at our cancer center in 2007. We examined gender, stage at presentation and insurance status in terms of trial enrollment. We compared the trial participation rate of AYA patients with that of older adults. In this adult facility, 12.7% (1,831) of total patients were between age 15 and 39. Overall therapeutic clinical trial rate was 17.6% which increased to 19.8% since 2007. Both nodal disease or metastatic disease at presentation was associated with increasing odds of trial enrollment (OR = 5.36 and P < 0.001 for nodal disease and OR = 7.96 and P < 0.001 for metastatic disease). There was a nonstatistically significant trend toward improved 3-year overall survival in the AYA patients with advanced presentation that enrolled on clinical trials compared with those not enrolled on trials since 2007. AYA clinical trial enrollment at a comprehensive care center melanoma program was higher than reported in the literature overall for AYA patients. This 1,831 patient cohort may provide a foundation for more detailed investigation toward quantifying the effects of clinical trial enrollment in terms of age-specific benefits and toxicities for AYA patients with malignancies that have their peak incidence in older adults.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Melanoma/epidemiology , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Female , Health Care Surveys , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/history , Melanoma/therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
4.
Clin Cancer Res ; 18(4): 1129-37, 2012 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22228638

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Signaling pathway stimulation by activating mutations of oncogenes occurs in most melanomas and can provide excellent targets for therapy, but the short-term therapeutic success is limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance. The mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/mTOR pathways are activated in most cutaneous melanomas. The purpose of this trial was to prospectively evaluate 2 molecularly targeted drug combinations in patients with untreated metastatic melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This randomized phase II study enrolled patients between May 2008 and November 2009 with nonocular melanoma, no prior systemic chemotherapy, and no history of brain metastasis. Arm A received oral sorafenib 200 mg twice daily plus i.v. temsirolimus 25 mg weekly; and arm B received oral sorafenib 400 mg every morning, 200 mg every night daily plus oral tipifarnib 100 mg twice daily, 3 weeks of every 4. The primary objectives were to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and toxicity for the 2 regimens. RESULTS: On arm A (63 evaluable patients), the median PFS was 2.1 months and median overall survival (OS) was 7 months. Three patients achieved partial response (PR). Thirty-nine evaluable patients were accrued to arm B, which closed after first-stage accrual; the median PFS was 1.8 months and OS was 7 months, with 1 patient achieving PR. CONCLUSIONS: The combinations of molecularly targeted agents tested did not show sufficient activity to justify further use. Newer agents and improved patient selection by characterization of the molecular targets in individual tumors show great promise and should be incorporated into future studies, along with appropriate laboratory correlates.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Benzenesulfonates/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/mortality , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Quinolones/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Sorafenib , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Transl Med ; 9: 60, 2011 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21569425

ABSTRACT

Led by key opinion leaders in the field, the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Biological Therapy of Cancer (iSBTc, recently renamed the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, SITC) provided a scientific platform for ~500 attendees to exchange cutting-edge information on basic, clinical, and translational research in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. The meeting included keynote addresses on checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy and recent advances in therapeutic vaccination against cancer induced by Human Papilloma Virus 16. Participants from 29 countries interacted through oral presentations, panel discussions, and posters on topics that included dendritic cells and cancer, targeted therapeutics and immunotherapy, innate/adaptive immune interplay in cancer, clinical trial endpoints, vaccine combinations, countering negative regulation, immune cell trafficking to tumor microenvironment, and adoptive T cell transfer. In addition to the 50 oral presentations and >180 posters on these topics, a new SITC/iSBTc initiative to create evidence-based Cancer Immunotherapy Guidelines was announced. The SITC/iSBTc Biomarkers Taskforce announced the release of recommendations on immunotherapy biomarkers and a highly successful symposium on Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers that took place on the campus of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) immediately prior to the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, the NIH took the opportunity to publicly announce the award of the U01 grant that will fund the Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN). In summary, the Annual Meeting gathered clinicians and scientists from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies from around the globe to interact and exchange important scientific advances related to tumor immunobiology and cancer immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Biological Therapy , Congresses as Topic , Internationality , Neoplasms/therapy , Societies, Medical , Advisory Committees , Awards and Prizes , Biomarkers, Tumor , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Immunotherapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Translational Research, Biomedical , Tumor Microenvironment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL