Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 26(5): 532-9, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25598359

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In patients with a prior myocardial infarction (MI), angiographic predictors of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after ablation are lacking. Recently, a proarrhythmic effect of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a coronary artery has been suggested. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 191 patients with prior MI were referred to our Hospital between 2010 and June 2013 for a first ablation of VT. Of these, 84 patients (44%) with stable coronary artery disease that underwent a coronary angiography during the index hospitalization were included in this study. A CTO in an infarct-related artery (IRA-CTO) was present in 47 patients (56%). Patients with and without IRA-CTO did not differ in terms of comorbidities, severity of heart failure, presentation of VT or acute outcome of ablation, that was completely successful in 93% of cases. At electroanatomic mapping, IRA-CTO was associated with greater scar and especially with greater area of border zone (34 cm(2) vs. 19 cm(2) , P = 0.001). Median follow-up was 19 months (IQR 18). At follow-up, patients with IRA-CTO had a significantly higher rate of VT recurrence (47% vs. 16%, P = 0.003). At multivariate analysis, IRA-CTO resulted to be an independent predictor of VT recurrence after ablation (HR 4.05, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: IRA-CTO is an independent predictor of VT recurrence after ablation and identifies a subgroup of patients with high recurrence rate despite a successful procedure. IRA-CTO is associated with greater scars and border zone area; however, this association does not completely justify its proarrhythmic effect.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Coronary Occlusion/complications , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/surgery , Aged , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/mortality , Chronic Disease , Comorbidity , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Occlusion/diagnosis , Coronary Occlusion/mortality , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain , Tachycardia, Ventricular/complications , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Ventricular/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 7(6): 1064-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25221332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-induced proarrhythmia remains unknown. We postulated that pacing from a left ventricular (LV) lead positioned on epicardial scar can facilitate re-entrant ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRT-induced proarrhythmia and LV lead location within scar. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-eight epicardial and 63 endocardial maps, obtained from 64 CRT patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation, were analyzed. A positive LV lead/scar relationship, defined as a lead tip positioned on scar/border zone, was determined by overlaying fluoroscopic projections with LV electroanatomical maps. CRT-induced proarrhythmia occurred in 8 patients (12.5%). They all presented early with electrical storm (100% versus 39% of patients with no proarrhythmia; P<0.01), requiring temporary biventricular pacing discontinuation in half of cases. They more frequently presented with heart failure/cardiogenic shock (50% versus 7%; P<0.01), requiring intensive care management. Ventricular tachycardia was re-entrant in all. The LV lead location within epicardial scar was significantly more frequent in the proarrhythmia group (60% versus 9% P=0.03 on epicardial bipolar scar, 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on epicardial unipolar scar, and 80% versus 17% P=0.02 on any-epicardial scar). Ablation was performed within epicardial scar, close to the LV lead, and allowed CRT reactivation in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRT-induced proarrhythmia presented early with electrical storm and was associated with an LV lead positioning within epicardial scar. Catheter ablation allowed for resumption of biventricular stimulation in all patients.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation , Cicatrix/surgery , Pericardium/surgery , Tachycardia, Ventricular/surgery , Action Potentials , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cicatrix/pathology , Cicatrix/physiopathology , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Pericardium/pathology , Pericardium/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Ventricular/etiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left , Ventricular Function, Right
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL